Scientific Study Of Personality Paper

Scientific Study of Personality Paper Lenora Collins Psych 645 October 31, 2016 Professor Julie Fenyk

Scientific Study of Personality Paper

Personality is describing as a manifestation of one’s experience journey through life. Although many people can and had share similar personality traits when it comes to feelings as well as behavior (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 8). However, it can consistent in one’s memories when describing personality characteristic. But many people have pick up on other
…show more content…
(Cervone & Pervin, 2010) However psychological factors of an individual’s who separates from one’s personality is called “Distinctive” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p.8). But personality also share within family’s background, financial condition as well as some circumstances and situation that contribute ways of how people deal with personality.

Language allows individuals a way to communicate, influencing an individual’s personality and their children’s development process (Triandis & Suh, 2002). Culture influence also plays a role in personality that emphasis a way of how important it is with people who’s struggling with personality disorder. However, most culture are learned though it society where we all can learn the important roles of element when experiencing one’s personality when observing young minds depending on its culture.

When personality psychologists say “feeling, thinking, and behaving it means that the notion of personality is comprehensive; it refers to all aspects of persons: their mental life, their emotional experiences, and their social behavior” (Cervone &Pervin, 2010, p.9). Personality psychologists have a difficult job and aim to understand the whole person (Cervone & Pervin,
…show more content…
55). These methods are usually desirable when scientist aren’t able to develop certain personality but is able to categorized questionnaires.

The limitations of a case study method have two problems: First, evidence from a case study does not apply to all people, and second, a case study method “does not provide evidence that one psychological process casually influences another” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 56). The second limitation is identifying causes. Researchers set out to find the causes of the phantasm the researcher’s study (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). Case studies do not provide a valid casual explanation (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 56).

These studies have some reflect on impressionistic reports that are measure by researchers when being conducted on several cases on trust and strategies. Verbal reports are also considered just as it is „verbal reports‟ (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). Although this case has its advantages, more researchers from correlational and psychologist had put together a large group of individuals from the internet to do a study base on questionnaires. “This is important in that the reliability of the tests is necessary to detect important features of personality that might be overlooked if one employed measures lacking reliability”

Related Documents