Essay On Correspondence Theory

Improved Essays
Two theories discussed in class were, the “Correspondence Theory of Truth,” meaning “X” is true if “X” is capable of correspondence to something in the outside, external, objective, or observant world. The other theory is the “Coherence Theory of Truth,” which says “X” is true when “X” belongs to a consistent system of propositions. The theory I think is the most accurate account of truth is the “Correspondence Theory of Truth,” it is based on the reality surrounding us, something we can prove. Unlike the “Coherence Theory of Truth,” which bases if something is true or not ideally on an idea, or because a hypothesis says otherwise. This theory seems to be based on assumptions really, not concrete evidence that will help us prove truth.
The
…show more content…
In this argument God exists, at least based on those whose evidence is written in a book that others follow in which everyone knows as the bible. It tries to persuade us in believing Gods existence without legit proof. I find this to be bullshit because I would not just believe that it was “God” who created us there has to be a greater explanation. The universe is so vast that our minds should expand on believing that there is a powerful being in the universe not necessarily the God everyone believes in. The Cosmological argument is not one I would believe when explaining our existence (Sober, 44-46).
The Cosmological argument is bullshit and Frankfurt’s definition of bullshit is a great way to define the argument. The lack of concern between truth and falsity is bullshit’s definition according to Frankfurt. The argument does lack the concern to prove Gods existence, they lack the truth in proving actual facts of Gods existence. They use false evidence, basing their belief off of a book seems bullshit to just believe what you read and not question otherwise. The cosmological does not care if the evidence is true or not this is why I believe this argument professor Arca threw at me was

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Entry 4 What did the Peculiar Institution consist of? The new peaceful institution-like nation had cotton as the main crop and social classes with the rise of wealth. However, the whites still supported slavery, with the north leading in the slave economy. Mixed reactions evolved towards the abolition of slavery, but most of the whites supported it and loved owning slaves.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two arguments that I think are the most compelling from this unit are the Ontological Argument, which is a priori argument, meaning before the experience. The other argument that is compelling is the Cosmological argument which is a posterior argument, or after the experience. The Ontological argument cam from Anselm and it states that “it is greater to exist in the mind and reality that just the mind, therefore God must exist” (McGowan). The Ontological argument isn’t about facts about the cosmos, but rather the concept of God. The Cosmological Argument states that “everything that is in motion is moved by something else, and infinite regress is impossible; there must have been a first mover; that first mover being God” (McGowan).…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The cosmological argument takes the presence of the universe to involve the presence of a being that made it. It is an argument that begins from the presence of the universe, and from endeavors to demonstrate the presence of God. This argument draws on involvement from the material world. It is crucial to know that the most this contention can plan to demonstrate is that there exists a vital being who caused everything in the universe. Nagel’s summary of this argument is as follows:…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Contingent beings require a necessary being as their ultimate cause.” (3) There are several objections to this theory. The first argument is the atheistic claim that the universe has always existed. This objection can only go against the temporal forms of the argument though. The non-temporal form of the cosmological argument does not deal with the concept of time, and is able to stand up to this objection.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Craig that he is “the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheist.” In this debate the same will occur for my opponent and all reading. Argument 1: Kalam Cosmological argument (KCA) (Heavily influenced by Dr. Craig’s presentation on the subject) P1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause “Nihil fit ex nihilo” That is to say that nothing comes from nothing.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the middle of the 17th century, thinkers in the enlightenment began to question how belief in the existence of a monotheistic God could be rationally supported. A number of arguments for and against the existence of God emerged at this time, and while the philosophical debate on the existence of God is still in session, the initial dust has settled. At this point in time, it is abundantly clear that a the cosmological argument is untenable at both a metaphysical and empirical level, and that the various versions of the cosmological argument fail to support the existence of God. There is good reason for critically examining the cosmological argument. Theists have made a claim that God exists.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cosmological argument The cosmological argument is a well known argument that attempts to prove the existence of God. The most common leader of the argument is Thomas Aquinas who devised Five Ways to prove the existence of God, which he referred to as “demonstration.” It comes to the conclusion that God exists from posteriori because it focuses on cause and effect to come to an assumption that God exists, which contrasts with the priori approach to the ontological argument. Linear religions generally accept that God made the universe ex nihilo because in Genesis God existed at the beginning of time; therefore, He must be the cause of the universe because you can’t have an effect without a cause.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “There is sufficient reason to believe that God is the cause of the universe” The cosmological argument is a multitude of arguments that have been developed to modern day ideas. These arguments are based on natural theology; this is when someone has knowledge of God based on experiences. It is a philosophical argument that aims to prove the existence of God. The cosmological argument rejects the idea of infant regress because if that is the cause there is no need for God.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One might argue that the Cosmological Argument doesn’t get us to the Christian God. One might argue if an I-being is even the same as God. Another question is if an Atheist can even accept the existence of an I-being. What Clarke is getting at here though is that he is not trying to prove the I-being is God, just that there is an I-being and there is a cause to beings. This could be a God or even just the universe.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, something distinct from the universe, some unconditional agent would be necessary to have created the universe. McCloskey also claims that the cosmological argument “does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-respect, uncaused cause.” In light of Evans and Manis, we might response that the argument from design only seems to show the existence of a necessary being that is the cause of the universe. (Evans & Manis, 2009).…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to the Oxford Dictionary, truth is defined as “the quality or character of being true to a person, principle, cause, etc. ; steadfast allegiance,faithfulness, fidelity, loyalty, constancy. Defining the truth in the dictionary is easy. However, in reality, the truth is not always so black and white. Drawing identical conclusions from identical facts can be very difficult.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lucas Shaw Short paper #1 Philosophy, Topic #2 Cosmological argument for the existence of God. Cosmological argument: An argument (or set of arguments) that undertakes to “prove” that God exists on the basis of the idea that there must have been a first cause or an ultimate reason for the existence of the universe (Introducing Philosophy, pg 661). This is the definition of this argument according to this particular book.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Existence of God This argument about the existence of God, better known as the cosmological argument, begins with the late philosopher Aristotle. Similar to a modern day natural scientist, he believed that we could ascertain more about the world and the very fundamental nature of things within our world just by observing and recording. In many ways Aristotle resemble a modern day artist, a person who goes through life experiencing and watching all different types of energy that’s around, visually records this information and help others by spreading this knowledge to the mass. Aristotle too, would look and study the world and its patterns that were around him in order to gain insight into his world.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before I explain that, I am going to tell you what is cosmological argument. The cosmological Argument (Greek "cosmos"= orderly whole): a posterior, deductive. "god" is the "first (uncaused) cause "of the cosmos. it is deductive, so it is a candidate for soundness. Then the cosmological argument is the argument that the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created it.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory has had a long history with philosophers of the past such as Plato, Aristotle, and Thomas Aquinas, but in modern philosophy the view of Bertrand Russell, who is a modern philosopher, is upheld. “Undoubtedly the most popular theory of truth is the correspondence theory , which says that truth is an agreement or correspondence between a proposition and some fact in the real world”(Velasquez 403). As a student of philosophy, I would like to analyze The correspondence theory of truth by comparing it The pragmatists theory of truth and The coherence theory of truth, I would like to analyze the facts and the real world, which are part of the theory, and provide some objections to the theory. In the search for truth, philosophers have come up with many theories regarding truth and justification.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics