Caycho Melgar Case Study

Decent Essays
Caycho Melgar, Jose, Plaintiff, Prose in this process request to the court, respectfully, to assess the Plaintiff’s Persuasive Argument in this process about his record medical and concern about his illiteracy in the English language, American legal Culture, and discrimination, retaliation claim under Title VII among other causes of action as barriers in the Discovery process. The plaintiff in addition indicates that his first reconsideration request was in function of the declared by the Tyler Paper Defendants “Response in Opposition on March 3, 2017” which differ of the Contained of the Order of the Court, in the denied of the appointment of counsel.
Therefore, The plaintiff, pro se in this process consider that the court must evaluate the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Joe Houston Case Summary

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The district court granted Marod’s motion to dismiss Houston’s claims based on a lack of standing to bring the Title III claim. The…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did the Supreme Court determine that the plaintiff had a valid CEPA claim?…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    ) ) The Plaintiff, Carl Ameche (hereinafter “Ameche”), complaining of the Defendants, Margie Congdon (hereinafter “Congden”) and Maple Meadows Campground (hereinafter “Maple”) would show unto this Honorable Court as follows: JURISDICTION ALLEGATIONS 1. Ameche is a citizen and…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goss Vs Lopez Case Study

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD FROM: AFCW/CS-30 SUBJECT: FIRAC -- Goss v. Lopez References: GOSS v. LOPEZ. Supreme Court of the United States. N.d. Print. 1.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whereas, the outcome was unsatisfactory. The court has denied the request despite Houston’s…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plaintiffs filed their complaint on May 22, 2009, naming as defendants in their official capacities California's Governor, Attorney General and Director and Deputy Director of Public Health and the Alameda County Clerk-Recorder and the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk (collectively "the government defendants"). Doc. #1. With the exception of the Attorney General, who concedes that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional, Doc. #39, the government defendants refused to take a position on the merits of plaintiffs' claims and declined to defend Proposition 8.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garrett Vs Fisher

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I represent the Respondent, and request of the court to affirm the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The legal standard is intermediate scrutiny. In order to disprove negligence, the challenged classification must serve an important state interest and is at least substantially related to serving that interest.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the final answer was the most important, the final answer was, “Yes he is entitled to the remedy, but why does he need it, and does the court really have the power to give him the writ. This question proposed conflict between Article 3 of the constitution and the Jud. Act of…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My client Rebecca Friedrichs has been teaching at various elementary schools for 28 years. Friedrichs is very displeased with the California Teachers Association, which is the sole and leading union in California (Brown). She is tired of being forced to support politically powerful unions that she disagrees with. I, Rebecca Friedrichs, and ten other believe that the California Teachers Association has violated Friedrichs and the other teacher’s first amendment right because having an agency shop limits freedom of speech and should not be upheld in law.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137, 122 S. Ct. 1275, 152 L.Ed.2d 271 (2002), Mr. Castro was fired for his organizing activities, which he was unlawfully terminated (“Undocumented Workers”., n.d.). “The National Labor Relations Board, the agency that administers the NLRA, ordered the employer to cease and desist, to post a notice that it had violated the law and to reinstate Mr. Castro, and to provide him with back pay for the time he was not working because he had been illegally fired (“Undocumented Workers”. , n.d., p. 5.) .”…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mattie T. Consent Decree (Mississippi) Citation MATTIE T., et al., Plaintiffs, v. HENRY JOHNSON, et al., Defendants DC75-31-S Plaintiffs and Defendants The plaintiffs listed in the original case were as follows: Mattie T., Aaron, O., Julius M., Aretha M., Anna M., Carol M., Christopher O., Christine O., James M., Michael E., Johnny W., Erma B., Louise R., James T., Charles P., Glendale P., Sammy Y., William Y., Tommy W., Myrtle R., Stevenson M., Bennett M., Steven J., Jacqueline W., Bennie F., John W. The defendants listed in the original case were as follows: Charles E. Holladay, et al and their successors in office Setting The basis of this case was twenty-six school aged children with disabilities represented by their parents,…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I chose this case out of the book because I have learned about this subject in my speech language pathology classes so it sparked my interest. This case took place in the year of 1970. Diana was a Mexican-American student that lived in Monterey County, California. She struggled in this English based school system and was given an IQ test.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thus, it is my contention that the plaintiff should not win the case, based on the facts provided. However, I do believe that Mr. Jackson had a legitimate case of discrimination against the WLAF and the criteria established in the McDonnell decision had been…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Plaintiff in this case has failed to form a prima facie case that either general or specific jurisdiction exists over the Defendant. The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) was granted and the Defendant was given leave to amend. In order for a District Court to hear a case it must have jurisdiction.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case study, the facts will be laid out and the court’s decision analyzed. Opinions will then be made based on our members’ impressions. Details of the case…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays