Causes Of The Reign Of Terror

Improved Essays
When does the justified become the inexcusable? The Reign of Terror was a period in which the innocent people of France could be executed for having a controversial opinion from a government that prided itself on the natural rights it was offering these people. Murdering half a million to save a government structure that is supposed to be dependent on the people cannot be excused as a mere sacrifice to save the revolution. The revolutionary government that was presiding over France was going against the very ideals it stood for to save itself from counterrevolutionary revolts. The revolutionary government had become blind by fear of the monarchy so much so that an absolute monarch had already arisen, Maximlien Robespiere, who would send to …show more content…
The new face of the absolue monarch was Maximillien Robespierre. Although he claimed to be a revolutionary leader, his tatics of governing gave him absolute control with no power check. “We must smother the internal and external eneimes of the Republic or perish…” (Document G). With the power granted to Robespierre ny The Committtee of Public Safety, he could send all of his enemies to the guillotine, which he did. Robespierre had become an absolute monarch without the title, murdering all those who opposed him and justifying it by reasoning that it was for the sake of the revolution. The revolutionary government had untimately become an absolute monarch, one worse than before, but was too blind to notice. The death of Robespierre had marked the end of The Reign of Terror. The violent acts of the revolutionary government did abolish the absolute monarchy in France and soon after the death of Robespierre, begin to regain the ideals that once founded it. However, the countless slaughter of innocent civilians, the loss of human rights, and the acts of Robespierre is an unnecessary price that was paid for The Reign of Terror cannot be justified by the stable government that

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Reign of Terror was to help keep the French government a monarchy, but the people still revolted. The Reign of Terror was not justified because it was unnecessary, it was brutal, and it denied the French people’s natural rights. Thousands of innocent people died during the Reign of Terror. “We must smother…” The Reign of Terror was not…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Terror was not simply the moment at which the French government unleashed its violence against its own people. The Terror, as it was seen during the Revolution itself, was rather a way by which one chose to think; it was, in essence, a rejection of monarchy and a willingness to proclaim full separation from the former rulers of the nation. This notion was perceived as an effort to intimidate the upper classes to enforce a new ideological era, not simply to employ physical violence against suspicious individuals. When Robespierre famously proclaimed that virtue and terror needed to be combined during the French Revolution, his message was not intended to be a justification of outright cruelty, but instead a compelling commentary on precisely how intimidation needed be used to threaten the royalist ideology. Indeed, while this was the valid historical use of the term, many abused its connotations and took it upon themselves to officiate a barbarous corporeal war against the French Republic’s supposed…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reign of Terror was the killing of hundreds of people who were suspected of committing treason and fighting for Prussia/Austria. Individuals argued if this was justified or in other words if they had a necessary reason to kill. The truth is that the Revolutionaries were justified to many reasons to murder innocent people over a political stand off. Firstly, the government had the mindset of keeping people safe and they were succeeding.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reign of Terror was one of the most brutal events of the French Revolution, killing over 35,000 people, including two rulers. The Reign of Terror was an 18 month period where Maximillien Robespierre led the government to execute all who did not support the revolution. These enemies were located both inside and outside the country of France. Some documents support the Reign of Terror, but it can also be argued that it was unfair and unjustified. After reading several documents, I feel the government’s campaign to execute thousands of innocent citizens was not justified for multiple reasons.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the apparent need for the revolution, there is no reason that such a horrid event like the Reign of Terror was justified. The Reign of Terror was not justified because it caused more foreign hostility, it involved an abysmal manner of determining who was executed or not and it caused damage within the country itself. Firstly, the Reign of Terror caused hatred towards France among foreign countries. Austria and Prussia did not want the Terror to spread to their countries so they decided to preemptively take action.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In January 1793, King Louis was executed, but the war was still going bad for France. The period following Louis’ death was known as ‘The Terror’ in France. It spread all over the country. This was a cruel period when France was killing its people by hundreds in a frightening way of rage and decadence. The people were arrested and executed without trial if they were accused of being enemies of the revolution.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror is not justified because of three major reasons: threats did not require the Reign of Terror, the methods were too extreme, and the Reign of Terror did not support the ideals…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ali McCowin Mr. Picazo History, Per. 5 6 January 2016 Was the Reign of Terror Justified? The Reign of Terror was a significant time in the French Revolution impacting the nation and killing many individuals. The Reign of Terror lasted less than two years. During that time, the Revolution was in extreme debt, due to wars.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Reign of Terror, a time of depression and tremendous agony, a reasonable act? In the eyes of many, it was not reasonable due to all the effects it brought among the country of France. Therefore it is clear that the Reign of Terror was not justified, because…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency; to forgive them is barbarity ,” is a quote by Robespierre during his time in power within the Committee of General Security. Robespierre believed it was upon the population to act on the means of attainment of reign of the constitutional laws. His speech explores the influence of society upon the fundamental principle of the democratic or popular government. The failure by the population was not seen favourable by Robespierre and resulted in the adoption of the Committee of General Security managing the internal policy of the country. “…But when the people itself is corrupted, liberty is already lost,” reflects the attitude of the people within the context of the Industrial Revolution, when Terror was lawfully inaugurated as a policy on September 5th, 1793.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Reign of Terror: Was it Justified? The French Revolution was an important movement in world history. It marked the first time that the lowest class in a country had overthrown the highest class. In France, the Third Estate had decided that they had had enough of unfair taxes and inequality, and so they wrote the Declaration of the Rights of Man and forced the king at the time, Louis XVI, to share power with the National Assembly.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, a social researcher, Karl Loewenstein, postulates an opposition. Although Napoleon contributed the success of the French Revolution, he eventually abandoned the democratic and performed his dictatorship. In the Karl 's book, "Opposition and Public Opinion Under the Dictatorship of Napoleon the First," Napoleon 's dictatorship was illustrated by this quote: "His rule over France is appropriated termed a dictatorship because it reveals all the features familiar in latter-day dictatorial governments, for which it serves-let it be noted here-as an unequal example. He eliminated successfully the rivaling political factors within the state, he destroyed skilfully the distribution of powers among different power-agencies; thus he gained…

    • 1080 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was The Reign Of Terror Justified? From 1789 to 1800 a time of revolution took place in France to end monarchy and finally give more power to the people. During the revolution, an era of revolts and many deaths, but also new ideas and extraordinary steps to a much needed government, the era of the Reign of Terror. The bloodiest time in the French Revolution, lead by many people such as Robespierre, an educated man that spoke on the behalf of the people and spread ideas and actions for a better government.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though Robespierre killed thousands of people, he believed he did it for the sake of the people to form a new government. As he stated, “Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country 's most urgent needs” (Terror and Virtue Letter). The Reign of Terror ended when the citizens put Robespierre on trial and executed him in 1794. Even with many deaths, fears, and changes…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One comparable result of these revolutions were the execution programs that emerged from them. In France, a program called the Reign of Terror, led by Maximilen Robespierre, had started. The purpose of this program was to institute a policy of fear or terror in those who dared to counter revolt. Although this began as a period of trials against those who seemed to oppose the revolution, it quickly altered into morbid confrontations where those accused were not allowed to defend themselves. Many were killed through the use of guillotine, an execution method of beheading.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays