Causes Of The Lincoln-Douglas Debates

Improved Essays
The Lincoln- Douglas Debates took act in 1858, it was also known to be called The Great Debates of 1858. The Lincoln- Douglas Debates of 1858 was seven different debates between Abraham Lincoln, the Republican candidate for the United States Senate from Illinois, and incumbent Senator Stephen Douglas, which was the Democratic Party candidate. At the time of the election of the state legislature, Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas were battling for the respective parties in the Illinois legislature. The debates showed the situations Abraham could have when he won the 1860 presidential election. The main debate that was talked about among all the seven states was slavery in the united states. Lincoln and Douglas agreed to have the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. What was the primary function of the commissioners? Who appointed the first commissioners and why? The primary function of the commissioners was to convince the other slave states to join them in secession.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Republicans formalized themselves in Congress and gained massive reputation during the 1856 presidential race with President James Buchanan (Democrat) won with 176 electoral votes and John C. Fremont (Republican) with only 114 electoral votes. Abraham Lincoln swore into the Republican party, but although he lost to Stephen A. Douglas for his Senate seat, he would later be sworn into the White House in 1860, defeating Stephen A. Douglas, the very mastermind who made the infamous Kansas-Nebraska act. But Douglas was not a racist of what many people…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Their heated debates were primarily focusing on the issue of slavery and states’ rights. The format of the debate was the first speaker spoke for sixty minutes; the other speaker spoke for ninety minutes, and then the first speaker returned for a thirty-minute “rejoinder.” Although the senators were elected by the congress in the 19th century, Douglas and Lincoln took their debates to the public was mainly for their party’s broader election interests of aiming to become the majority in the Illinois legislature. Similar to the political rhetoric in today’s elections, Douglas tried to label Lincoln as the extreme Abolitionists to instill fear in the local suffrage; partisan politicians’ mud slinging, crushing opponents’ moral conscience or patriotism were common practices even before the two-parties…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When Stephen Douglas made a bill that would allow slavery (in theory) to any state about to enter the union, this caused some anger and hatred. After it was placed into effect, around 1000 northerners flocked to Kansas trying to get it as a free state. They were also given weapons to defend this decision. However, it would not be met with deaf ears; pro-slavery forces from Missouri were at the other end of Kansas trying to set up shop in opposition to the anti-slavery forces. At first they were not going to fight each other; they were both trying to set up government, albeit illegally for the pro-slavery’s part.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Politics during the 1850s became heated, especially between Lincoln and Douglas. Document 7 states Douglas’ response to Lincoln in Freeport Illinois. Douglas argues that no matter what the Supreme Court decides about slavery in the territories, the people have the final word in if an area has slavery or not because local police forces enforce the laws on slavery. Lincoln was against slavery, while Douglas was for it, and because they were both presidential candidates, it forced the United States citizens to pick a side, dividing the country more. As the presidential race raged on, people became more violent.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Douglas: Abolitionist, Proslaveryite, or both? Francesca Scola Stephen Douglas's purposeful political ambiguity and avid pursuit of self-aggrandisement demonstrated through his stance on the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Lecompton Constitution, and Freeport Doctrine, ultimately cost him the 1860 election. Through his stance on the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Lecompton Constitution, and Freeport Doctrine, Stephen Douglas’s purposeful ambiguity and avid pursuit of self-aggrandisement ultimately cost him the 1860 election.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One major controversy of the 1850s was the Kansas-Nebraska Act which was around 1854, A man by the name of Stephan Douglas made a proposal that Kansas and Nebraska be divided into two sections while the Missouri compromise be repealed, settlers had to decipher on whether or not to they wanted slavery in their territories which was popular sovereignty. In relation to the expansion of slavery, this contributed to the divide of America on the how the Union looked at slavery and the Confederacy. Many states had their own stances on slavery as they were either pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri compromise, which for the most part kept the Union intact over the last few decades. As a result of this Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cause Of Civil War Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Name: Instructor: Course: Date: The causes of the Civil War The civil war lasted for a period of 4 years from the year 1861 to 1865. The war led to more than six hundred thousand casualties.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kansas Nebraska Act ended up being one of the deadliest compromises before the civil war almost like a preamble to it. If the voting to decide on the matter of Kansas becoming a free or slave state had been only open to the people living in Kansas for a certain amount of time this amount of death and destruction could have been avoided. But because of it, it only pushed the country closer to the edge of the civil war. The Election of 1860 ended with the victory going to Abraham Lincoln.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Disagreements in political decisions became a large dividing factor between the North and the South, along with the growing disagreements between the North and the South in ideology. Even from the founding of the country the North and South had been divided. The Nullification crisis was the first event that highlighted the division between the North and South. The nullification crisis was the confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government in 1832–33 over the former's attempt to declare null and void within the state the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832. The disagreement on the secession of South Carolina caused further disagreements between the North and South (Document A).…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Slavery was the underlying cause of the American Civil War. After the Republican and abolitionist Abraham Lincoln won the election in 1861, southern states became afraid of his political believes. His election caused major discussion in the southern states, that depended on slavery. States were preparing for secession because of the new president’s future actions. These states were very dependent on agriculture and abolishing slavery would certainly hurt them.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe the Civil War was fought over the issue of slavery, state’s rights, and also the power to control the West. What ultimately caused the Civil War would be the Compromise of 1850. Other main factors that caused the Civil War would be John Brown’s raid, the Second Great Awakening, and also the involvement of women in the Abolitionist movement. The reason as to why the Compromise of 1850 was the main cause of the Civil War would be due to the fact that it increased sectionalism, did not solve the issue of slavery, and also paved the way for the Fugitive Slave Laws of 1850. The reason why these events are the most significant are that they are the most pivotal events to occur during this time, which ultimately paved the way for the first…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1862, Frederick Douglass, a former slave and active abolitionist, was travelling across the Union, giving speeches and soliciting signatures for petitions against slavery (Douglass, 413). In February, he published a speech titled "The Reasons for Our Troubles," which he had given in Philadelphia about a month earlier. In this speech, Douglass argues his beliefs on the causes of the Civil War and on how to solve the issue of slavery in America. In contrast, after the Civil War had ended, in 1866 Jubal Early, a former Confederate General, published a record of his experiences and thoughts from the last year of the war (Early, 429). In his preface, Early relays what he believes to be the truth about the war and advocates for his beliefs in…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Brown Dbq Essay

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Both Kansas and Nebraska mounted in cross-border acts of violence over the terms of slavery. As a result of the Kansas-Nebraska act, the conflict was a main point of argument the North had on the continuation of slavery in the West. The conflict between the North and the South’s rhetoric behind slavery caused them much tension. Abraham Lincoln gave a campaign speech referring to the Democrats as bushwhackers and informants of false information that cannot be justified (E). Since the Democratic Party inhabited much of the southern lands of the United States, this perception of the Democrats similarly denounced the ideals of the south.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays