Causes Of Imperialism In The 1800s

Superior Essays
The 1800’s was a time of American expansion from the quaint east of the North American continent, in which the majority of citizens resided. Americans began to migrate to the west, creating the country known today as “The United States of America”. They then looked toward distending into the rest of the Western Hemisphere including the islands of the Caribbean and parts of Pacific Asia. Big businessmen, government officials, American military, and the presidents of this era began to invade and take control of these territories and implemented their power, thus creating the term imperialism. The reasons behind this extension was primarily to rebuild a struggling U.S economy and gain control. There was much debate on whether not America’s …show more content…
Instead of the democratic principles our nation adopted, America became militaristic in nature. When the United States entered into these territories, they became almost police-like and took away the freedoms that they promised these people (Doc 6). A country founded on liberty should not rob that from others. America was unjust and took away the rights of these people. Instead of allowing them to govern themselves and keeping a neighborly relationship, America became the police and took government control of this land (Doc 8). Throughout these years of imperialism the United States goal was to shy away from such practices, as they have suffered these same hardships from Europe, yet they became their own enemy. The alleged rights and freedoms that they granted the natives were not actually true. For instance, the situation in Puerto Rico. America granted this area a territory of the United States, giving them citizenship and common wealth. However, they do not posses the basic rights of the citizens in the rest of the U. S such as the right to vote for the U. S president. The United States went against their values of democracy, liberty, peace, and independence, becoming utterly hypocritical and tyrannic. For these reasonings, America’s actions were not justified during the age of American Imperialism. America wanted the powerful title, …show more content…
They did not use the newly claimed lands to benefit its inhabitants but for their own selfish uses. American officials truly did not care about the citizen living there, solely the use of their land (Doc 5). In areas like the Caribbean and Pacific Asia, they cultivated their tropical fruits and established factories on their acreage and sold these products in American markets (Doc 1). The american economy was struggling in the 1890’s and the only way to boost this recession was to expand worldly and create markets in various parts of the world. Various types of people expanded this business, without a care to how it will affect the people. Americans ruthlessly harvested their land and put the citizens to work in their factories in order to create a fast cheap product. Subsequently, those who built the Panama Canal were not americans alone, they were also locals from Panama, the West Indies, and parts of Asia. Not only was this land for markets but for naval bases and and coal mining, as stated in the Platt Amendment of 1903. The United States established railways, steamship lines, and markets in these areas to the people they thought were too inarticulate and backwards to have rights and formulate intelligent decisions of their own (Doc 3). America’s business practices were anything but equitable in these countries solely for the benefit of economical

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Neo-Whigs claim that the British government should have let the colonists have a say in their own government and the British refusal to let them is sufficient to spark a rebellion. The British were so far from America that much of the European influence did not live long in the colonies. British officials sent to govern the Americans did not have the correct mindset with which to govern a self-reliant people. British officials were used to the people of conquered territories coming to the British governor for everything from protection to lawsuits. Americans wanted to solve their own problems.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act DBQ

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The government believed that the Indian Removal was a way of saving Indians and their culture from western settlers and their influences. The Native Americans viewed the Indian Removal as a the U.S. expansion intended to get rid of them, and their land that belonged to their ancestors. The Cherokees were very much like white settlers, they even had slaves to complement their farming, but they weren’t white. In a time plagued with inequality, the nation failed to meet up to the preamble premise of justice. Indians were not considered to be American citizens which restricted them of land and a voice in government.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Republicanism is saying that they do not want just one ruler to lead the country because that installs too much power to just one person. The new settlers were accustomed to this kind of leadership back in the homeland but were not fans of it so they wanted something new and that is where republicanism came into play. The British wanted to have their established leadership to be installed in the new world while the people that were currently living there did not. This was one of the main things that sparked the revolution. Other things that did was the fact they signed the declaration of independence without Britain know and they considered this treason and that is another thing that sparked this war.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Infringement of Rights in the Colonies The American Revolution must be viewed as much more than the want for separation from the mother country. Parliament not only disregards the fact that the colonies should live and abide by the same laws and liberties within the realms of England, but treats the colonies as if they are much less than what they are. The hunger for power in England ultimately ensued the end of their rule in the colonies. The American Revolution must be considered a defense of traditional notions of English liberty because the king repeatedly strips the colonies from the same freedoms that the people inside England have. Many colonists’ want for the separation from England is no secret by the time the Stamp Act Congress…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These taxes were for the benefit for King George III, in order to pay off his det. The colonists saw that the taxes were not to their benefit and fought back. The goal of the American Revolution was the have the independence from Britain (Pavao, 2014). The goal of the American Revolution was for the colonists to have the same rights as the Great Britain. The goal of the American Revolution was reached in a different way from the original goal.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the largest differences in these two wars is seen in the outcome. The American Revolution for a large part fulfilled its main goal, while the French Revolution did not succeed at making the changes they wanted. The colonists in America were fighting for independence from Britain, and when the war had ended, that is what they had. The United States became completely separate and was not controlled by the English. In contrast, while the French people wanted a change in government from a monarchy to a republic, they did not get what they fought for, instead the government became a dictatorship, the same or possibly worse that the previous monarchal situation.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President Polk was known as “Polk the Purposeful” his objective was to expand the nation (The American). The United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico for the act was hypocritical of American ideals, fought for trivial goals of a tyrant that were executed in a manner that opposed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness which were established in the Declaration of Independence. The first inalienable right introduced, is that of preserving life. It is well established that war is a poor method of preserving life. Yet, President Polk still uses the loss of life as a reason to fight.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The whole trading system was meant to enrich the motherland by transporting and consuming. Although this imperial relationship between England and America does not serve the whole for colonists, there were other benefits. With being a part of the English empire, colonists were given defense. This saved the colonies millions with Britain taking the expense. Also, the mother land paid bounties to encourage the production of these rare materials.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taking over territories was seen as ruthless by some because it was inconsiderate to the people inhabiting the conquered territories. The main problem with American expansion was that it was selfish, the true reason for American expansion was not to help other nations but to help themselves become and remain one of the greater nations. For example when the United States decided to adopt the Philippines, America refused to allow Filipino leaders to form their own government. Essentially it was not only to better the lives of the Filipinos but to ensure that the Philippine legislature would not pass any laws that could hurt American business. Much like the domination of the Philippines when America decided to claim Hawaii as a territory it was mainly because Hawaii was at a convenient halfway point between the United States and Asia.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This policy left us to negotiate trade agreements with eleven Latin American nations. This left eighteen Latin American states that declared war on our allies and us. The difference between the Monroe Doctrine and the Good Neighbor Policy is that the Good Neighbor Policy did not allow the United States to directly intervene with foreign affairs and the Doctrine did. Another benefit to the Good neighbor Policy was the increase of American forging policy throughout Latin America. While the U.S. was labeling them as the international police force, they were implementing American foreign policy through force, which was not the most efficient way of doing so.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics