Causes And Short-Term Effects Of World War 1

Improved Essays
World War 1 was a major event in history, not for just one country but for many. World War 1 was also associated with the making of the modern world and modern technology as well as helping us understand what mistakes not to make. There are long-term effects and short-term effects that led to World War 1. Some of these long-term causes included Imperialism and
Militarism which are big contributes for the world to go at war. There were also these short-term causes that started to light the fire between these countries and their alliances, some of the short-term causes which we’ll talk about are, the web of alliances and the catalyst. The catalyst was the spark which caused World War1, this was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand - the
archduke
…show more content…
This brought completion between the two countries and so Britain tried to stop
Germany from being ‘stronger’ than them, so this lead to much conflict.

Militarism was another long-term effect that tied in with imperialism, leading to World War 1. Militarism was associated with imperialism as militarism means, for a country to have a strong (and maybe even stubborn) feeling that they are the ‘ultimate’. They have the best military and biggest navel support and so they believed that they could take on any country, win and make the war ‘quick’.
A country having this strong and deep feeling, pushed the leaders into world domination also with the strong force of Nationalism. The leaders may have though that if they were the best and had the greatest military, why not take over the rest of the world with our support and power? When other countries, who had a great military with strong navel support, saw another country building up their military and navel support, they felt threatened and wanted to prove that they were the best, so this had a big effect on the lead up to World War
…show more content…
The web of
Alliances was when countries joined forces and combined their militaries and naval support.
There were two alliances: The ‘Triple Alliance’ and The
‘Triple Entente’.
The ‘Triple Alliance’ consisted of Germany, Italy and
Austria-Hungary and with these countries combining their forces and supports to each other, made it harder for them to be attacked and so they would back each other up if a country dared to attack them. They hoped that they would get the impression of intimidation across. Then The ‘Triple Entente’ did the same, and this consisted of Great Britain, France and the Russia
Empire. They joined forces so if the ‘Triple Alliance’ strict one of them, they would also have the support of each others military and navy - as well as giving that intimidating feeling back. The ’Triple Entente’ wanted

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Nationalism became the leading force in the certification of the German identity, and the newly created German superpower wanted to look for “their place in the sun”. Nationalistic ideologies and national self-interest became the reason this large scale war broke out and tore away at Europe. Their decision to go into a “irrational” war was largely based on their “rational calculations” and national interest, and the armistice that lead to the Treaty of Versailles would prove that national interest is always in the mind of nations when they go into war, and when they end the war. At the time, Germany was allied with Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire, while the source of the…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilhelm’s decisions had many ramifications, in particular, disturbing the progress and stability that Bismarck had achieved for Germany. Wilhelm and his pressure group, the Pan-German league, were greatly influenced by the notion of ‘World Policy’. Here, his desire to control colonies, international trade and achieve a status equal to Britain, completely neglected Bismarck’s hard work in using diffusing tensions between rival nations. Driven by Wilhelm’s love/hate relationship and rivalry with Britain, he wanted to expand his naval power and imperial possessions. This desire grew tension amongst the great powers and he became known as the ‘war lord.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These alliances included: the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy, and an alliance with Russia. The purpose of these alliances was to protect Germany from invasion or attack from either France or Russia. However, the alliance with Russia crumbled after Bismarck had influence from another power which invigorated Austrian aggression. So, in order for Germany to save itself from total attack, it had to end its membership in the Triple Entente. Germany backed up Austria in their attacked of revenge against Serbia for the assassination of Ferdinand, and in turn, declared war on France because they believed that France would support its Russian ally.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although in some ways Germany played a minor role in causing World War I because Germany was pressured into WWI to honor its alliances, Germany should be blamed for the war to a great extent because Germany played a crucial role in establishing the alliance system, increased tensions and anticipation of war throughout Europe through its militaristic practices, and increased the size of World War I with its aggressive use of military strategy and new weapons. While some have maintained that Germany was not at fault for World War I since Germany joined the war because of its obligation to help its allies, Germany should be blamed for World War I due to the country’s influential role in developing the alliance system in Europe. Prior to World…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War One Essay Although Germany is blamed for World War One because they contributed greatly to the sequence of events that led to the catastrophe, war clouds were hovering over Europe by early 1914 due to extensive military build up by European nations, violent nationalistic aspirations amongst cross border Slavs and Serbs and mutually binding strategic alliances that would draw all of Europe into war due to a local conflict - thus validating that Germany isn 't solely responsible for World War One. Militarism refers to the opinion of a government or a nation that their country should maintain a strong military force which should be used aggressively to defend themselves or to promote national interests. During the 1800’s, many European…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imperialism is defined as the domination of one country by another. This was a cause of the war because conflict started to brew between countries fighting over the colonies. This then escalated when allies came into play. Nationalism simply having patriotic feelings and doing anything for your country. This was a cause of World War I because it made each country thin they were the most important and they wanted to be successful.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The third cause was nationalism and how people would do anything for their country. People believed that they were the best and that war would mean they would gain power. The spark was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Even with all the other causes a war might not have occurred without this spark. It set the countries off allowing them to use their strong militaries, help their allies, and make their country seem like the…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, since he raised such a powerful government, when he left, the country called for stronger leaders to rule Germany. Kaiser Wilhelm II’s foreign policy of Weltpolitik was practically the polar opposite of Bismarck’s Realpolitik for it was based on emotion and thus led to several bad decisions.Wilhelm put Germany into financial, social, and political distress by attempting to expand the navy and by declaring war and then becoming a figurehead for his generals. Kaiser Wilhelm II was significant to WWI because he caused several conflicts in it and led to the downfall of Germany during the war. All in all, Bismarck’s Realpolitik though less ambitious, was more cautious and led to the prosper of Germany unlike Wilhelm’s rash foreign policy which let to the downfall of Germany during WWI, however both leaders in…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperialism Causes

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many Europeans felt their nation’s culture, military and economy was superior to others. Nationalism is when a country pushes their own nation’s agenda onto other countries. World War 1 was partly a result of European nations that wanted to prove their dominance as a country over each other through strength and power. In order for politicians to make their nation believe that they were the superior country, they would demonise rival countries in their popular media and newspapers. One of the messages that came across at this time was that if their country went to war, they would naturally be…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War 1 Tension Essay

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Long-range weaponry was a threat and so others responded by building up their available weaponry or the navy that they had to make them seem bigger and stronger than they were. Another cause of the rising tensions came from leaders wanting more territory and some even trying to find a way to get it. Expanding territory and the country’s power are known as imperialism, which is the reason Germany backed Austria. The pre-war alliances were another major cause of the war, countries that might not have joined the war otherwise felt the need to because of their…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics