Causes And Disadvantages Of Asymmetric Warfare

Decent Essays
Before diving too deep into the idea of offset strategies, you must first understand the concept of asymmetric warfare. As defined by the Encyclopedia of Military Science, asymmetric warfare is “an inferior power fighting a superior power as each side strives to exploit the other’s disadvantages”. The inferior power is referred to as the insurgency, and the superior power’s efforts to shut down the insurgency is called counterinsurgency. Insurgents generally attempt to take advantage of the greater powers’ weaknesses or vulnerabilities as well as try to break the control they have over the state whether institutionally or morally. In this paper, I will primarily be focusing on how insurgents have responded to American aggression. While Americans …show more content…
An example of this relating to the United States would be the Vietnam War, for instance. Vietnam used guerilla war tactics and were able to withstand massive amounts of firepower. This resulted in a long, tedious war which led to civil unrest back in the US to the advantage of Viet Cong. My next, better known example is 9/11. The terrorist group al Qaeda focused on destroying not only very visible and physical objects of the United States but objects they knew would hold an emotional value to the American people as well. This ploy worked in that it scared the nation but instead of dividing our state, it brought us closer together; we were able to retaliate quickly and effectively (Tucker). While the United States is usually the superior power in asymmetric warfare, our government and, more importantly, our military know …show more content…
Asymmetrical warfare refers to a difference in existing power two conflicting states have such as manpower, global influence, or even literal size, and an offset strategy is a difference in technological or military power between two conflicting states. A state will create an offset strategy in order to be ahead of its adversaries militarily rather than going into a conflict with a level playing field (Robinson). An offset strategy is an intelligent way to insure future successes as well as to assure the nation that it can defend itself if the need were to arise. By taking control of a situation before it is a huge issue, a state can drastically change the probability of a negative outcome. In asymmetric warfare, the insurgents try to attack the opponent’s vulnerabilities so, by having an offset strategy, the superior nation can not only protect itself to avoid even needing a counterinsurgency plan but also move the issue to more favorable conditions where they will be better equipped to handle the insurgents. Also, creating an offset strategy a state has another advantage of possibly preventing an altercation altogether by creating such a situation that the adversary, whether insurgent or not, would be discouraged by the poor odds in their favor (Robinson). To understand the effects of America’s newest offset strategy, a brief summary of the United States’ history with offset strategies is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rules of engagement for the Unites States in the Vietnam War were a framework put into place by military authorities to define the limitations and circumstances that combat will be initiated or continue with enemy forces. (Georgia Tech College , n.d.). The rules are put into place to be compliant with international law for conducting war, minimize friendly fire accidents, and protect civilians. All of these regulations also had political motivation and each level of rank within the army from foot soldiers to the President were micromanaged under these political constraints; this paper will examine six key participants.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States has come a long way since the days of the American Revolution or either of the World Wars. Today war is all about airstrikes, drones, and the use of any other new technology in order to find a way to keep our troops at home and fighting conflicts without having “boots on the ground” as the saying goes. However even with, or perhaps because of, this new technology our country finds itself involved in conflicts that are unconventional to what we have seen in our history. The young generation of Americans today has grown up learning about the wars against terrorism where the enemy is hard to really signal out from a large crowd. We have become accustomed to fighting against what Max Boot calls “invisible armies” because it’s…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In laying the blame for all that went wrong in Iraq and Afghanistan at the feet of our senior military officers, he lets our political leadership and the other departments of the government mainly off the hook. While he discusses the drawbacks of counterinsurgency, saying the American military is not built for it and questioning the American public’s ability to stomach it, he fails to take successive Secretaries of Defense to task for their part in not asking the hard questions of their senior military advisors and of a lack of clear whole of government strategy in prosecuting the conflicts. He does not question the decisions, strategic guidance, or policy making timelines of both the Bush and Obama administrations. While this book adds to the scholarship on the conflicts since the attacks of September 11, 2001, it is not a complete history nor analysis of why the conflicts ended, in Bolger’s words, as “two lost campaigns and a war gone awry”…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Upon its 2006 release, policy analysts heralded FM 3-24 Counterinsurgency (COIN) as a welcome solution to the intractable problems confronting American soldiers in Iraq. The manual served an important purpose by providing a common approach to operational problems that US forces faced in Iraq at the time. Renamed Insurgencies and Countering Insurgencies, the 2014 update incorporated lessons from the manual’s use in both Iraq and Afghanistan, such as the inclusion of indirect methods of security cooperation with local partners and the “identify-separate-isolate-influence-reintegrate” approach. A full evaluation of FM 3-24, however, must account for its most significant deficiency. FM 3-24’s critical weakness lies in its theoretical basis—the…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Nation in a Perpetual State of War The United States has been in a continuous state of war since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers. In response to these attacks, the United States has deployed over two million troops amongst all five of its military branches combined. In 2014 the US withdrew a majority of its troops from the combat zones in the middle east, however the war still wages on. Many military leaders, as well as the American population entered the war with a gung ho attitude following the terrorist attacks, however as time has gone on, military personnel and civilians alike have had a change in attitude over a seemingly endless war.…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the five branches of the US military were beaten by, say, a nuclear holocaust, the only national defense left would be the civilians themselves. Any subsequent military invasion—probably armed with AK-47 variants—would find it very easy to overrun civilians armed only with lever, bolt, and pump action weapons”…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This article discusses the under evaluation of the effects of war carried out by the United States military. Although there is much debate about foreign policy, there isn’t must justification for our nation’s wars. As the Iraq war grew unpopular, the analytical focus shifted deficiencies in intelligence analysis, war-planning, and counterinsurgency doctrine. There is not much focus on the theories of democratization, energy security, non-proliferation, and of failed states justifying the war and occupation. As the studies are focused on being cost efficient, recent U.S. wars proven that overthrowing dictators ruling over fractious organizations might cause lasting conflicts rather than stability, let alone liberal democracy.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Drones In The Civil War

    • 2693 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Nick Mariano Dr. Mark Wilson ETH 2050 24 November 2014 Game of Drones In the Civil War, Confederate generals like Robert E. Lee dismissed guerilla warfare as dishonorable and immoral. It was akin to shooting a man in the back, they said. Today, guerilla warfare forms the foundation of modern military strategy.…

    • 2693 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. When it comes to U.S foreign policy, there are many strategies used in order to ensure the best interest of the United States. One of these strategies occasionally include supporting insurgencies through finances and weapons. However, if we look back in history we can see that supporting insurgencies has not always worked in the best interest of the United States. As there are high risks associated with such a strategy.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When studying American Military history, there are several recurring characteristics of America’s manner in which it conducts warfare. Many colonists who lived in America before it became a country had similar ideologies to the Americans who came after them one hundred years later in the Civil War. Despite the lapse of time, early Americans can be characterized as being uniquely opportunistic in the way in which they conduct war. Americans collectively operated on the ideology of opportunity. America in its early stages was not the military power it is today, therefore it to relied on patiently waiting for the enemy to expose any sort of weakness to capitalize on.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Attributing ‘new wars’ to be determined by asymmetry as the most important feature provides suitable parameters of war which constitutes a ‘new war’ as the environment of war shifts as Clausewitz identifies but also the actors. As concluded, the lines of war are becoming much more blurred than in previous centuries due to close alliances between mercenaries and bandits. In addition, Münkler recognizes that similarities can be drawn from wars of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. He has brought together key elements from the wider literature of Political Violence and Terror referencing key theorists and attributing varied theories to Asymmetry with a wide range of aspects: technology, economics, motivations and ideology. Asymmetry provides an umbrella theme of ‘new war’.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The global issue raised in this article is whether or not offshore balancing can be used in today’s world and be an effective practice that the UNited States should readopt. The practice of offshore balancing is a strategic international relation where a great power uses a favorable country to check the rise in power in a non favorable hostile country. Mearsheimer states that “offshore balancing, the United States would calibrate its military posture according to the distribution of power in the three key regions. If there is no potential hegemon in sight in Europe, Northeast Asia, or the Gulf then there is no reason to deploy ground or air forces there and little need for a large military establishment at home” which shows how offshore balancing…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Unconventional Warfare (UW) is considered the trademark of the U.S. Army Special Forces (SF). In fact, UW often serves as the focus for training, planning, and discussion within every aspect of the SF community. Most debates involving UW turn into an analysis of defining Unconventional Warfare and trying to figure out how to fit current SF operations into that definition. Special Forces prides itself on owning UW and serving as the Department of Defense’s subject matter experts on operating by, with, and through an indigenous force. The debate over Special Force’s ownership of this domain should not rely solely on the training, funding, or even doctrine that validates UW as a SF core task.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “ By the 20th century, military organizations confronted the problem of not only adapting to technological changes in peace time, but also the fact that war itself has inevitably turned up the speed of technological change”. The first Gulf War constitutes a turning point in the history of modern conflicts essentially because of the integration of technology into all levels of military operations. War was always been a declaration of hostility between two opposing groups clashed over a battlefield in a duel with the ultimate aim to impose its will on the other. However, the advent of new technologies has completely changed these legendary and almost static clashes.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The formulation of Allied World War II strategy was an evolutionary process. It began with Admiral Stark’s “Plan Dog” memorandum providing the early outline for Allied strategy and ended with a unified Anglo-American-Russian plan for victory. British and American leadership discovered the advantages and disadvantages of coalition operations as they struggled to identify a unified grand strategy during numerous meetings during the war. The Germany First strategy that was solidified at the Arcadia Conference ensured Allied survival and the Tehran Conference produced a unified strategy that achieved victory. Britain’s Sun Tzu approach was prevalent early in the war when means were limited and they were the dominate partner.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays