Cattle Company V. Winstead Case

Decent Essays
Philips Brothers, LP, Harry Simmons and Ray Winstead were owners of a catfish hatchery and farm in Mississippi called Kilby Brake Fisheries. Ray Winstead operated the catfish hatchery for eight years and only two of those years were profitable. As a result, Ray Winstead was terminated and sued the owners for the alleged freeze out. The owners suspected Winstead of brokering and asked for his financially documents. The State court denied the request and the jury awarded winstead more than 1.7 million dollars which Kilby Brake appealed.
Mississippi Supreme Court reversed the lower court decision based on the information found during discovery. Winstead financials showed his Cattle Company making profit even though it did no actual business.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Warshall V. Price Case

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Issue: Under Florida law, can a cause of action for conversion be brought when an individual unlawfully takes property owned by the true owner, even if the property has no actual value? Rule: A cause of action may be brought when an act of dominion has been wrongfully asserted over another 's property inconsistent with his ownership, even if the specific property converted has no actual value. In the precedent case Warshall v. Price, Appellant, Dr. Steven Warshall, began a private practice in Palm Beach in 1978. In 1984, Warshall hired Price, also a cardiologist, for an employment span of four years.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the Equal Pay Act? The Bill of Equal Pay Act was first approved and signed by President John F. Kennedy on June 10, 1963. Employers were payed based on gender, and not on work. This act, which was the first of its kind, made it illegal for any wage disparity based on men and women working in the same place or comparable work under comparable conditions. This act was signed by the President Kennedy as part of his New Frontier Program.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue in the case of Donald B. Farmer v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Farmer claims that since there was another man already charged and convicted of these crimes, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibits the Commonwealth from prosecuting Farmer under inconsistent theories regarding the identity of P.F.’s rapist and also, that the evidence was insufficient to sustain Farmer’s convictions. In 2011, Donald Farmer was convicted and sentenced a 125 year sentence for the rape of P.F, statutory burglary, robbery, and the murder of Eathel Fraenzel. In 1987, Farmer and his friend Williams both knocked on the door of Eathel and P.F and attempted to rob them and ended up murdering Eathel…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Elridge V.: Case Study

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Elbridge’s divorced in 2010 and Mrs. Gwen Eldridge was awarded custody of their two minor children. Mr. Eldridge was ordered to make child support payments of $700 per month. He lost his job as an electrician in January of 2011 and was unemployed from that date through October of 2011. Upon which Mr. Eldridge received a job in his field as an electrician. Unfortunately, Mr. Eldridge did not make child support payments for the 10 months that he was unemployed.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Salmon V. Sawyer Case

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The record in their case also establishes that neither attorney challenged several police seizures or money confiscated from October 1996, October 1997, September 1999, October 2001, January 2001, March 16, 2004, or 2005 traffic stops. What happened to the collections? None of the attorneys deposed the alleged drivers, the police officers or other witnesses involved in these alleged traffic stops to question their role in the stops, their communications with the alleged drivers of vehicles or whether the dollar amounts in question are accurate collections. The indictment fails to establish the Johnson brothers individually or in concert engaged in a continuing criminal enterprise.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    MILLERSBURG — A local woman was arrested Wednesday after she allegedly conspired with a Millersburg man to assault and restrain her boyfriend, preventing him from leaving an apartment at which they were staying temporarily. Jamie L. Spears, 26, who is currently without a permanent address, is charged in Holmes County Municipal Court with abduction and domestic violence. The abduction charge is a third-degree felony punishable by up to three years in prison. Spears, who remains incarcerated in the Holmes County Jail, with bond set at $10,000, is next scheduled to appear in court for a Feb. 23 preliminary hearing.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Issue: Whether the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, and can prove the plaintiff was trespassing by entering onto the defendant’s property without permission and subsequently injuring themselves by operating the defendant’s tractor. Rule: Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout, 84 U.S. 657 (1873) Analysis:…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2. Who are the stakeholders in this case study and what are their interests and agendas?. Dr. Richard Ragsdale opened an abortion service in Rockford for the past 12 years. Because Dr Richard’ Ragsdale’s landlord refused to renew the lease, he was forced to move the site. When Dr Richard Ragsdale submitted paperwork to the state for the new location, he was advised that there is a public hearing to consider the need for the new facility.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The case of Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. v. Saskatchewan, 2005 SCC 13, [2005] 1S.C.R. 188 is considered very controversial as it questions the national public health concern that is caused by the smoke of tobacco and can affect our youth in a negative way. What this cases focuses on is s. 6 of the Saskatchewan Tobacco Control act and how by the virtue of the paramountcy doctrine is inoperative due to the fact of s. 30 of the federal tobacco Act. The doctrine of paramountcy establishes that where there is a conflict between valid provincial and the federal law or its purpose, the federal law will prevail. Furthermore, s. 30 of the federal tobacco act allows retail stores to display tobacco and tobacco product-related brand elements and post…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Hitesman was a registered nurse and shift supervisor at Bridgeway, Inc, nursing home. He displayed concerns to management about that amount of infectious diseases within the nursing home. He claimed that the incidents of infections were rising at a disturbing rate. The management did not take care of the situation as he desired. Therefore, he told a television reporter about the problems in this nursing home.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furman v. Georgia Any case that can make its way to the level of the supreme court shouldn’t be taken lightly. It’s probably a case that can cause controversy or is because of controversy. Back in 1972, there was a case known as Furman v. Georgia. This particular case circled around the issue of placing the death penalty as the final verdict of a person convicted as guilty. Though the person convicted was guilty of murder, the case was brought to the supreme court to dispute the punishment of the case.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Court Case Review Throughout the years the United States government has been faced with several discussions. Some of these have become very important throughout history and have left a significate impact on society. These cases range from birth control privacy rights to equality. Among these cases are Griswold V. Connecticut, Baze V. Rees, and Brown V. Board of Education.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US is known for being the land of the free, and for the longest time people left their home countries to experience the American dream. America was looked at to be almost a utopia, where everyone had equal opportunities, and everyone was happy. Without laws this would never happen, and thanks to the constitution, there were certain rules set in place. The judicial review is in short, the power for the court to decide is a law or decision the government made is constitutional, or decent. To start, the Dred Scott vs. Sandford was historical for using this method.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bell vs. Buck case was a very sensitive topic during its time due to the concept that feeble-minded individuals should not pass on their genes. It led to many controversies: some agreed with it and others believed it was unethical, however, one must fully understand the reasons why the Supreme Court went through with the decision. There are several cultural values that support the Supreme Court’s decision including prevention, balance, and responsibility. The first value which appears to be the most prominent is responsibility.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Xander Kanalos Coach Blount 4th Period 14 March 2018 Dred Scott v. Sandford,1857 The Dred Scott v. Sandford case was the most impactful in the supreme court and in general to everything that is constitutional. The case called for a man who was a slave that sued for freedom in their state which was Missouri(slave state). This case was important to African Americans and the United States because of the laws that were put in place after this case.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays