Cupp's Argumentative Essay: The Legal Rights Of Animals

Good Essays
People abuse animals all the time, but nowadays more and more people are standing up for the animals. It is not okay to physically harm animals in any way, and the punishment can be considered a felony in all 50 states (Grimm). This has led to many different opinions about the legal rights of animals and how far they should go. Animals are starting to have more rights these days, going as far as inheriting money and becoming the subject of custody battles (Grimm). People have been considering animals a part of their family for a while now which makes them more human. The discussion about animal rights has been long debated. Many people believe it is a moral issue and people should know what is right and wrong, so animals do not need more …show more content…
Richard L. Cupp is under the impression, “nonhuman animal species are incapable of significant moral responsibilities,” (1). Therefore, animals should be no more than property and behavior change has to come within the abuser. Morals are knowing what is right and wrong. He believes animals do not possess this so being property is sufficient. Humans have responsibilities to animals. They need love, attention, food, water, etc. While Cupp does believe abuse is wrong, and there should be punishment, he sees no reason for actual rights. As mentioned before, animals do have thoughts and feelings. They know right from wrong, if they didn’t then they wouldn’t know to bathe their litter, or help comfort someone when they are feeling down. Animals are extremely intuitive and know more than what most people believe. Animals deserve to be considered more than property. People who abuse animals are not going to stop just because of their morals. If they are already doing it, then they clearly are not going to want to stop. The lack of respect and care some animals receive is appalling and animals should be able to stand up for themselves in order for more people to see how serious the matter is. Once animals have the rights they deserve, the amount of abuse and neglect should dramatically drop. Abusers will see animals have some of the same rights they do which will make them stop and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    So instead of using the term “animal rights,” people should use the term “animal welfare.” Animals don’t have the same rights or even close to the same rights as us humans. Animal welfare states that we know that animals may be used for certain purposes but shouldn’t be mistreated or abused. Some people say that animals behave selfishly, and only look out for themselves and their own interests. Since animals don’t behave morally they don’t deserve to be treated morally by human beings. If we want animals to have rights like us humans then that means we can’t breed or kill them for…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Even humans, on a biological level, are animals themselves. With that being stated, the main argument boils down ethics, with each and every person’s morals playing an important part. I, personally, am against animal abuse, so consequently I believe that this issue should be addressed more firmly by people, by the law, and by the world. I, as a pet owner think that animal cruelty is one of the most wicked things in the world. People with good intentions but ultimately neglect and abuse animals, I am more lenient to, because people who fall under this category generally cannot help the situation they are in, or just ignorant on the issue.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some claim it is better to use animals as testing subjects rather than humans. However, that is one of the main areas that they are misguided in. While yes, it is good if humans can stop others from being used as test subjects, using animals as testing subjects does not help humans. Instead, there is another possibility that helps both humans and animals, and none of them have to receive pain. Despite that, since using other methods of testing can be a little more complex, many companies do not want to execute it, sticking to the old fashioned way.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animals don’t have the intelligence and thought process as human beings which easily distinguish them. In conclusion animals should have rights to a certain extent to where they aren’t being lab experiments resulting in torture and them feeling…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The ethical treatment of animals should be taken more seriously because of the cruelty suffered by animals at amusement events, factories and in the research field. Animals ethics is a term to describe the way the human reacts with the animal and how the animal should properly be treated. Many philosophers believe that since animals doesn’t have the moral judgement that humans have, then anyone can do whatever they want to do them because they don’t know right from wrong. An animal is very important, the animal will know if what is happening to them is normal or not, many things people do to them wouldn’t be something they experience on a daily basis. Animals doesn't deserve to be treated any differently than humans.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Angelou wants the reader to feel sympathetic towards the animals knowing that they can also fear for their lives. Maya Angelou end the poem by saying, “They existed, we can be” (Line 38), in my opinion this means that humans and animals can live in the same nurtured environment. But I don’t think animals and humans can thrive side by side. There is a hierarchy that humans are at the top of, humans will always utilize them for what best fits us. The truth is animals will never be treated will the same moral respect as humans will get.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “If he is not to stifle his own feelings, he must practice kindness towards animals, for he who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals”. Thus, it is in the self-interest of humanity to treat animals humanely. Kant’s view was that we should avoid pointless cruelty to animals, and since animals are here only to serve man, causing animal suffering is justified whenever it suits our interests. Conversely, animals do have the right to live without cruelty and abuse, and it is our obligation to make sure these things do not occur.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animals do their best to please us and occasionally they fail but we as humans do not always succeed in things either so what is so different about animals not being able to constantly please us. We should be treating all living things, from humans to animals to plants, the same way that we should treat anything with respect. Animals deserve our respect, they do so much for us and they should be praised for the good things they do. As a reward, they should not be tested on and they should be given the same treatment as other human beings. The reason animals are believed to be so different from us is because they are thought to lack Factor X.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, animals do have the right to be respected in disregard of the fact that animals may not necessarily enjoy the same right as human. So it is immoral to allow animals to be utilized as mere means in animal experimentation. According to Regan, the only explainable reason for an individual to undergo painful experiments would be to benefit these very same individual, or through their own will. For example, this would justify performing therapeutic procedures in animals, as well as in children and people with disabilities that cannot express their consent. So experimentation aiming in testifying products is in no way…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A specific community may decide that the animals they use for many purposes including food and fur among others do not have rights, which leaves them vulnerable. On the other hand, a community that decides to protect animals rights may choose to define tough measures against those that violate those rights. Without a doubt, this theory is consequential in the sense that it prompts the conversation on animal rights, by asking people to consider animals as beings with feelings. Ultimately, what happens to animals will depend on the beliefs of a specific society since the majority will follow whatever society passes as…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays