"Mixed Blood” In this article the author intends to demonstrate that the idea of race is only a social/cultural development and a myth. The idea that individuals divided into particular race based on their "biological differences" is a fantasy it’s a myth, everything is just in our heads we have just created it as a community/society, race is not a thing that was always here, it’s only been here since humans have. And the author does a very good job explaining this with good scientific and historical facts that no one can disagree too. This article helped me realize the author’s message (of race just being in our heads), this is not something that I would have really thought about ever if it wasn’t for this article.…
How the Government Came to be The Enlightenment affected everyone in one way or another. Wether it be from the social classes, religious beliefs, or its political structure. Some people agreed with these ideas but some also went against them. The ideas of the Enlightenment had the largest impact on the social classes and political structures. Some of these effects were for the better and some were for the worst.…
Over the course of two centuries European society saw a shift in their views of children and child-care. Before the Enlightenment period children were seen as vile and a nuisance by parents, this was because of high mortality rates. Children would be beaten by parents, cared for by other people than the actual parents, and harmed by negligence of parent. Suddenly when the Enlightenment period saw an expansion of many ideas that focused on having more love towards others and especially children. Along with Enlightenment, new medical practices such as the smallpox vaccine allowed for longer life rates as well as less infant mortality rates in society.…
After centuries of intolerance and absolutism dominated the European continent and left the majority of its people with few to no rights, living in conditions with little hope to advance themselves as individuals, the cruelty of the Middle Ages finally gave way to a new movement that offered hope for a better life. There have always been great philosophers throughout history, dating back to the Ancient Greeks and Romans, but during the Enlightenment, some of the most influential voices including Voltaire, Condorcet, Baron de Montesquieu and John Locke literally changed the course of Western civilization. The Age of Enlightenment represented more than just a collection of thoughts, but formed the fundamental backbone of ideals and principles…
During the Scientific Revolution there was a para dime shift which caused an era of questioning and skepticism. The religious assumptions that guided the thought of the medieval scholars were abandoned in favor of mathematics and mechanical metaphors. This led to the Enlightenment period where many people challenged tradition and faith with scientific methods. This created a philosophical, spiritual, economical, and cultural revolution that would change the way people thought forever. Throughout the Enlightenment period, as people began to question received authority, and they started exploring new ideas of religious toleration, individualism, and the unlimited potential of human society.…
With the new ideas of the Enlightenment being popularized, Europeans began to take different views that usually contrasted previous ways of thinking, including different takes on religion, open-mindedness and rejection of human rights, and exploring different ways of thinking about everything else. With the success and praise of these up-and-coming ideas, many others were inspired to learn about and come up with their own resulting in a plethora of new knowledge that modernized Europe to this day. Being a staple in the European mind for ages previously, new ideas about religion largely affected it’s place in society, including the way people looked at it. The Enlightenment was inspired by religious endeavors to begin with, for example Copernicus’s…
The 17th to 18th century was a time of new knowledge and reasoning that greatly affected society to this day. These two centuries were known as the Enlightenment Period or the Age of Reason. There were many people called philosophes or philosophers that believed in using reason, observation, and nature to come up with an unbiased answer. There were many philosophers during this time who believed in different things. Some main beliefs were: the right to govern, the right to education, and religious freedom would all greatly benefit society.…
Sociologists often argue that race is a social construction. A social construction is a set of stories we tell ourselves to organize reality and make sense of the world, rather than a fixed or biological reality. We tell ourselves the same story repeatedly, and eventually we being to believe it. People may use their race to give themselves an identity. With race being a social construct, it has caused us nothing but bigotry and trouble.…
It was shown that when scientists and anthropologists of the time were studying this topic it was shown that they were rejecting three fundamental premises of a very old racial ideology: “1) The archaic sub species concept, two parentheses the divisibility of contemporary humans into scientifically valid biological groupings and 3) The link between racial traits and social, cultural, and political status.” Mukhopadhyay & Henze also discussed the United States racial categories that are used on the Census. They believed that race as biology was being inconsistently used and that the terms used on the census are partially valid because “the biological attributes used to define races and create racial classifications rely on only a few visible, superficial, genetic traits – such as skin color and hair texture – and ignore the remaining pre-ponderings of human variation.”…
These categories of race were based on common inherited background. But, today some civilized society use race as ‘stampt’ to sort people into made-up classes they believe…
The biological construction of race consist of one’s DNA (Lewontin, 2006). Scientists have determined that every human is a part of the Homo sapiens species. They have also determined that because everyone is part of the same species, everybody shares a mutual descent. Throughout history, external traits that are visible, such as facial features, skin color, and hair form, have been used to determine one’s race (“American Association,” 1996; Lewontin, 2006). This aspect of biological construction of race is still seen in today’s society (Machery & Faucher,…
They were described as obstinate, merry, free, and painted with fine red lines. European, Homo sapiens europaeus, were labeled as white, optimistic, and muscular, gentle, active, very smart, inventive, and covered with close vestments. Asians, Homo sapiens asiaticus, were identified as pale yellow, melancholy, stiff, severe, haughty greedy and covered with loose garments. The African peoples, Homo Sapiens afer, were described as black, slow, foolish, relaxed, crafty, indolent, negligent, and were people who anointed themselves with grease. (p.…
When considering the human race, finding something to unite us all could be a welcome gift. If the goal is unity, French anthropologist Louis Dumont says this: The oneness of the human species, however, does not demand the arbitrary reduction of diversity to unity- it only demands that it should be possible to pass from one particularity to another, and that no effort should be spared in order to elaborate a common language in which each particularity can be adequately described. The first step to that end consists in recognizing differences.…
Through the classification of humans based on their physical appearance, rather than their innate characteristics,…
Much of the world today has been greatly influenced by concepts that originated and thrived during the Age of Enlightenment. What was considered important in historical times may no longer be major priorities of today. Much of what people consider to be important depends on their culture and their society. Is personal freedom more important than government? Is rational thought more valuable than religious rights?…