Categorical Imperative Essay

Improved Essays
What is the categorical imperative, and is it moral? In The Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Ethics, Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative is the belief that in order to reach a morally just conclusion one must act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law. In other words an action should only be reasoned to be right if it would be acceptable by society for everyone to do it. This leads me to believe that:
The categorical imperative is moral:
(1) When abiding by the categorical imperative, you use reason and rationality.
(2) If you use reason and rationality, then you are moral.
(3) Therefor the categorical imperative is moral.
Although the categorical imperative is not
…show more content…
Some individuals use and manipulate the categorical imperative as a means to justify the choice they already know they want to make. An example of this would be a man that morally donates his time to a homeless shelter because he truly wants to make a difference, and a man that donates his time to a homeless shelter saying he wants to make a difference, but in reality he is only fulfilling a required number of community service hours for a program. While some actions may appear completely moral, other actions can come off as completely self-serving. Nonetheless, we must keep in mind that every action we see can be credited to some reason other than morality. The categorical imperative is simply a standard to help us better evaluate what ought to be done in moral dilemmas. Although Kant tries to make the categorical imperative seem like a nicely packaged set of rules, we must be mindful when observing these rules, as they are merely guidelines. As our book Fundamentals of Philosophy points out, our moral decisions rarely come to us in neat and tidy choices between obvious good and obvious evil. As the old proverb says, choices are about saying no to one thing so you can say yes to

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Due to examples such as the 2003 War in Iraq by the US, it can be seen that not all motivations are pure. Kant then states a limitation that not all actions are performed completely out of good will, and only categorical imperatives, which are actions that are done just for the sake of being done, and therefore considered as a priori since it is a means and an end, are truly pure. This is agreeable, however, it must be noted that hypothetical imperatives can also have good will (i.e. lying in order to protect someone’s feelings), yet at the same time, categorical imperatives would be more reliable. He gives four examples of categorical imperatives. Adherence to the first principle, which says one should not kill himself, is a must in order for humans to remain in the world, in addition to the importance of life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, the ability of one to pursue their own individual interests is a hypothetical imperative, but the right for one to pursue their own individual interests is a categorical imperative. Many…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is here that Kant’s rationale for making choices, as well as morality, can be…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s basis for “Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals” is an objective view into how and why decisions are made among rational beings for the furtherance of their and society’s wellbeing. Through his view in the 1700’s we can see how much of a scientific stance Kant took in journalizing his analyzation of his own and society’s morals. Kant lists five “formulations” that are involved in rational decision-making. Rational beings have utilized the “Categorical Imperative” to shape today’s society by way of relationships and treatises. These formulations give rational beings an expanded view of the many faces of the Categorical Imperative.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant argues that duty is based solely on reason (Kant,81). Kant believes that the act of lying, murdering, robbery are the wrong action and we have a duty not to do these things. According to Kant, consequences are not what makes an act right, but the right action makes the act right. Also, our good motives or intentions will lead us to the good path without qualification. The Categorical Imperative is the supreme principle of morality.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Categorical imperatives have no specific goals and just what to do the right thing. In all, Kant believes that one should not pursue morality by looking first at particular examples and then deriving a theory…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this is where Kant’s categorical imperatives come into play. As stated before, the first is that we are to never treat people as a means. Secondly, we are to adhere to a maxim that can govern all people and eventually become universal law. There is an incredible difference between a categorical imperative and a hypothetical imperative. The difference is evident because to the Kantian, morality should be based on the categorical imperative, or something that is help to be good in any scenario at any time.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When first reading the experiment in regards to rescue I and rescues II, I did not like or want to make a choice, and really, I do not have to make a choice. My job is to tell you what Stuart Mill would do and what Immanuel Kant would do based on their philosophical views of utilitarianism and categorical imperatives respectfully. In Rescue I & II Mill. Utilitarianism is the basic principle to look at what is right and wrong. Depending on the consequences or the outcomes you can select the course of action not which is in your own best interest, but that which takes into account the best interest of others.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet, despite its influence, Kantian ethics seems to have several weaknesses. First, since people are emotional beings, reason and rationality is usually not enough to motivate them act morally. Another weakness is that Kant’s categorical imperative allows for much mistreatment of animals that should not be considered morally right. Therefore, although Kantian ethics provides many strong arguments, one should always critically evaluate the ideas that are presented, especially when it deals with such a subtle and controversial issue as…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume and Immanuel Kant are both known for their great contributions to moral philosophy. Hume who is mainly known for his empiricism, skepticism and naturalism and Kant who is best recognized for his great work in metaphysics, ethics and also for his contributions in others disciplines in the area of philosophy. Although they were both exceptional philosophers and gave stupendous apports, Hume and Kant agreed nor differed in various aspect and ideas. Hume believed and is mostly based on his empiricism which involves the theory of the mind. Hume’s empiricism consist in to affirm that the moral foundation is not in the reason but in the senses.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The categorical imperative is a moral obligation that is not dependent on the situation of individual, meaning there is a set rule for everyone. A Kantian would say that in order to do something, everyone else must also be allowed to do it. This means that if someone can lie, then everyone can lie, and if someone can steal then everyone can steal. A Kantian would add that if the situation in which you try to achieve your maxim is immoral, do not give up. Rather, you should find a different way in which to achieve the maxim.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Next, we will define the categorical imperative and apply it to this ethical dilemma. The Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals starts by making the distinction between “pure” and “empirical” philosophy. According to Kant, “metaphysics” or pure philosophy is based on a priori concepts. A priori concepts are independent of experience or observations. Empirical or a posteriori concepts, on the other hand, are dependent on experience of the world and specific circumstances.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays