Self Defense In Maryland

Improved Essays
The state of Maryland follows the common law when it comes to self-defense: the amount of forced used when defending oneself and the duty to retreat. The definition of self-defense given by the common law is “The right of a person to protect oneself with reasonable force against another person who is threatening to inflict force upon one 's person.” Correspondingly, the duty to retreat is “The doctrine holding that a victim of a deadly assault must attempt to safely retreat before using deadly force in self-defense;” thus, Maryland does not have a stand your ground law. However, if one enters someone’s home or establishment, with the intent to harm them, they are allowed to defend it and do not need to retreat. In the State of Maryland one …show more content…
In the state of Maryland, in order to have one’s actions justified as self-defense, the victim must be able to prove that they had “reasonable grounds to believe himself in apparent imminent or immediate danger of death or serious bodily harm from his assailant or potential assailant,” and that the actions they took were a response to the danger they felt. Therefore, if an assailant hits me, I have the right to hit them back and if they say they are going to kill me, I then have the right to kill them in pursuit of saving my own life. Correspondingly, if my assailants punched me and I decide to just stab in the chest to kill them, I am in the wrong. My assailant showed no intentions of killing me; therefore, my stabbing of my assailant to kill them would be unreasonable and excessive.
After one defends themselves from an attack, they must then prove to the court that all their actions were justifiable acts of self-defense. If a victim is unable to prove their actions were a result of self-defense they can face criminal charges. Similarly, if the victim claims self-defense the courts must decide which form, so they can be found not guilty. The forms of self-defense are self-defense, defense of others, defense of habitation, and defense of property. Each form has factors that decide whether the victim meets the requirements or

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    A recent study has found that ‘One Punch Assaults’ have cost 90 Australian lives since 2000, most fuelled by drugs and alcohol abuse. Due to the increase in Youth Violence, Queensland’s Newman Government, as part of its Safe Night Out Legislation Amendment Act, 2014 has introduced the offence of ‘Unlawful Striking causing death.’ This recently developed law has a tougher penalty than manslaughter because it eliminates certain defences that are available under the charge of manslaughter. In the Criminal Code 1899, (QLD) Section 314A states that for the offence of Unlawful striking causing death, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant unlawfully struck another person to the head or neck and caused the death…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People V. Sm Case Brief

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The court held that the defender acted in self-defense. “A person is justified in the use of deadly force…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second element needed is that the accused did not instigate the aggressor to assault them. The third element is that the accused did not mean to kill the person with the amount of force that they had use. The fourth and final element was that the force was just enough to help the accused to get away from the person that was assaulting them. Also within this type of self-defence, there are two things that need to proven when it comes to using this defence. The first is that the accused did not plane to murder the aggressor.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another response is resistance. This generally builds upon the feeling of anger at being victimized (Dunn 73). This response includes stating boundaries, not letting the defendant into your home, threatening to call the police, fighting or struggling, hanging up the phone, arguing with the defendant, or yelling and swearing at the defendant (Dunn…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you do not warn and just shoot the man is dead and cannot shoot anyone. Another example of this is another person I interviewed. This man talked about when he took the classes to get licensed to conceal carry. He spoke about what the instructor said about self defense. “When i was taking the class if you were ever gonna defend yourself he said shoot them in the head so their is no one to prosecute you.”…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carrying a Concealed Weapon Victimology Florida International University By Melinda J. Persaud November 25, 2014 Introduction According to Florida statues you must have a license to carry a concealed weapon. In order to obtain a license you must be at least twenty-one years of age, not suffer a physical infirmity, and must be a resident and citizen of the United States or a permanent resident (Statues & Constitution). There are many more regulations in order to get a license. Carrying a concealed weapon has become a problem, although it is a privilege it can sometimes cause people to get into trouble.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kiara Rivas Philosophy 25 Due Date: 5/6/2015 Mock Trial: U.S v. Dominique Stephens The case I am presenting today is about a woman who admits to having killed her husband and is being charged with first degree murder. The woman’s name is Dominque Stephens and Mrs. Stephens claims that she has acted in self-defense after suffering many years of domestic violence in her marriage.…

    • 2831 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “People tend to complicate their own lives, as if living weren 't already complicated enough.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón. Stand your ground law states that an individual has no duty to retreat from any place they have a lawful right to be and may use any level of force, including lethal, if they reasonably believe they face an imminent and immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death. The Stand Your Ground Law was passed in 2006 for the first time in Georgia. Although some may believe that the “Stand Your Ground” law protects American citizens from any potential threats, people may take unfair advantages of the law;therefore, the current “Stand Your Ground” law should be abolished.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are arguments that Stand Your Ground law should be implemented in all states throughout the country so more victims could possess the right to protect themselves from bodily harm, without any form of repercussion. Kaduce and Davis explained the difference between the traditional law and the Stand Your Ground law. “The common law approach had erected an expectation that a party to a threatening interaction occurring outside the home (or castle) leave or retreat from the situation when it was reasonable to do so.” (Kaduce and Davis, 2013) They also included the Florida law, “A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has the right to be has no duty to retreat, and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.”…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Louisiana, Lillie would be able to recover under Louisiana Civil Code article 2315, which states in pertinent part “Every act whatever of man which causes damage to another obliges him by whose fault it happened to repair it.” La. C.C. 2315 allows someone who has been wronged, to be compensated for the damage caused to him or her. In order to recover under La. C.C. art. 2315, an intentional tort must have been committed. In the present case, Joe has committed the intentional tort of battery. A battery is defined as harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The effectiveness of self defense training and/or combat training to reduce the effectiveness of an untrained aggressor with a…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The defendant would have to be able to prove that committed the crime within the stature of the law. In these situations, the goal is avoiding legal actions by claiming that the other person brought it upon themselves. Basically, the defendant must prove to the jury that he acted to save his life. Under this if the person can prove they acted in self-defense the defendant would not need to see the inside of a court room.…

    • 2467 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deadly Force Defense

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The deadly-force defense in a self-defense claim used to justify that a reasonable amount of force is necessary against another individual when that threat is deadly or may cause serious bodily harm often found in assault, battery, and homicide cases. Lisa M. Strom, 120, (2012). In other words, deadly force is a legal action taken that could potentially kill the other person who unlawfully enters a home, attempted murder, or felony action against oneself or another. Nonetheless, there are four elements in order to use self-defense related to the circumstances by proving the attack was unprovoked, injury or death was imminent, the amount of force was reasonable, and it is reasonably objective for the individual to fear for their life or serious…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is done by one person putting enough fear into a person where one person’s life is put in danger so they surrender their will. However fear can also be used to justify self defense according to Hobbes. “ For not ever Fear justifies the Action but the fear onely of corpoerall hurt, which we call Bodily Fear, and from which a man cannot see how to be delivered, but by the action. A man is assaulted , fear present death, from which he sees not how to escape, but by wounding that assauleth him; if he wound him to death, this is no crime; because no man is supposed at the making of a Common-wealth, to have abandoned the defense of his life, or limbes, where the Law cannot arrive on time enough to his assistance” (Hobbes 343). This simply means that once people are in a commonwealth they have the right to defend themselves if their life is being threatened and help cannot arrive in time.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a major debate about when you can and cannot defend yourself . The article " Principles of the Just War " state that " self-defense against an armed attack is always considered to be a just cause ." . This is a great point , an example of this is WW2 . The U.S. remained neutral , and the country was against going to war . After the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7th , 1941 the country had its reason , the next day December 8th , 1941 the U.S. entered the second world war .…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays