Casias V. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc Case Study

Improved Essays
The Case: Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. With the advent of legalized marijuana usage comes inevitable lawsuits, especially in terms of how employers interpret the law and their own private workplace policies. That was exactly the situation for Joseph Casias, a five-year employee of a Michigan Wal-Mart store, who was wrongfully terminated for failing an injury-related mandated drug test. There were several factors: Joseph was prescribed medical marijuana for the treatment of pain associated with sinus cancer and an inoperable brain tumor. He used the drug to deal with his constant pain, but regardless was able to work a full time job at Wal-Mart. Casias maintained that he did not use the drug while at work or prior to a shift. In November of 2009, Joseph was injured on the job and he was taken by his manager to the local emergency room for treatment. In accordance to Wal-Mart’s employment policy, the hospital administered a drug test and it came back positive for …show more content…
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2012). However, a caveat not well known is the MMMA does not extend to employer’s policies on private employment relationships. The act (2008) specifically provides that it cannot be construed to require employers to accommodate the medical use of marijuana in any workplace. Consequently, Joseph was not protected from being terminated by Wal-Mart; the court found in favor of the employer and the wrongful termination suit was

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the case of EEOC against dollar general, I would rule Dollar General guilty. The reason being is that Dollar General is discriminating against certain crimes and doesn’t worry about how old the crime is. For example, in the article it states, that Dollar General looked at drug possession felonies that was 6 years old. No matter how old the felony was Dollar General automatically disqualified the candidate.…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judge Casas’ Ruling In APUSA Inc. v The State of California the court rules in favor of APUSA,Inc. The court finds the State of California violated the establishment clause using the Lemon Test and Agostoni test. In both instances the CCQEA explicitly violates the establishment clause by way of money being directly distributed from the government to the religious institutions, joined with a lack of specificity of how the money is to be used. The State of California would be served in adding guidelines to the law clearly dictating that grant money is not to be used for secular purpose.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Identification: Legal Services Corporation v. Velazquez 531 U.S. 533 (2001) Facts: Carmen Velazquez, a 56-year-old grandmother, claimed her public assistance benefits were wrongfully terminated. Her benefits were terminated for failure to participate in a job search program without a pre-termination hearing. Without the pre-termination hearing, she was not allowed to present her physical impairment as cause for her inability to work.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study: Option #1 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island Breana L. Gray MG260 Business Law Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island Parties The Plaintiff and Appellee are 44 Liquormart, Inc. since they have brought a case against the state of Rhode Island and are the respondent in a case to a higher court. The opposing party is thus described as the Defendant and Appellant, being the state of Rhode Island. Facts A Rhode Island law banned the advertisement of the price of alcoholic beverages in all forms, except in the form of tags or signs that were only located inside the actual liquor store.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us V. Williams Case Study

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    U. S. v Williams 922 F.2d 737 (11th Cir. 1991) Parties United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit v. Joseph Emmanuel Williams Facts Facts Williams was indicted and charge with three counts and conspiracy to transform cocaine into crack. Mr. William hires a minor to help him transport crack cocaine. He was accused with conspiracy to intent to distribute cocaine violating a federal regulation. Charge II he aided others personnel in possessing and intent to distribute crack cocaine.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby was a case between Sylvia Burwell, the secretary of Health and Human Services, and Hobby Lobby’s owners and founders. This case dealt with the issue of should Hobby Lobby be able to deny employees contraceptives on the health care provided for the workers by the business. This case was a case between workers’ healthcare and religious rights. This case gains attention and the Supreme Courts elect to hear it. They come to the decision that Hobby Lobby should be left their religious freedoms.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    IRAC of #2B II. Count Two of the criminal complaint, possession of equipment to manufacture methamphetamine, should be dismissed on the ground that it is a lesser-included offense of Count Three, manufacture of methamphetamine ("meth"). The issue in the present case is whether §43: Possession of Equipment or Supplies with Intent to Manufacture Meth (“Possession of Equipment”) should be dismissed because it is a lesser-included offense of Count Three, §51: Manufacture of Meth. A defendant cannot be charged with the same crime twice, for that would be considered double jeopardy.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Employment Division v Smith brought upon the issue of what extent does the free exercise clothes of the first amendment accommodates for. Alfred Smith and Galen Black worked as counselors for private drug rehabilitation. They were fired from their jobs because they ingested peyote. Both ingested peyote for sacramental purposes at a ceremony of the Native American Church, which he was a member of and both were denied benefits because they had been discharged for work-related "misconduct". The court ruled not to give smith an accommodation.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Lee, the plaintiff, Clark, worked for Wal-Mart for almost ten years. Walmart Stores Inc., v. Lee, 74 S.W.3d 634, 640 (Ark. Sup. Ct. 2002). The defendant, Elder, investigated Clark as Wal-Mart’s loss prevention officer, on suspicions that Clark stole merchandise from Wal-Mart. Clark allowed Elder to access to his house and property to investigate and prove that Clark did not steal from Wal-Mart.…

    • 1960 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “EEOC takes the position that any sort of transgender discrimination is sex discrimination, because it inherently involves taking gender—and therefore sex—into account” (Grossman, 2012). A specific example of discrimination based on transgender status is sex discrimination and is a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights would be the landmark case of Macy v. Holder. Macy, a male transitioning into a woman, applied for a position at a crime lab with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) (Waguespack, n.d.). She was informed twice by the director that the job was as long as there were no problems with her background check. During the background interview process Macy informed the background check investigator that she was in the process of transitioning from male to…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Tucker Vs Walgreen Company

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Walgreen Company and EEOC v. Walgreen Company have the potential to affect the organization's stakeholders, reputation and legal responsibilities. While there will always be the need for a more equal world and more aware and kind-hearted human beings, society is starting to break the surface with understanding the crucial necessity for equality and the demise of discrimination. But, when a company does not flow with the change of society, then the consequences could possibly become detrimental to the business, its reputation, its income and employee/customer loyalty. Especially when the business resides in a state that has a diverse racial and cultural base. A more detailed description of these effects will be found in the following paragraph.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Xyz Rehabilitation

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This is because the company did not hire her due to the fact that she is taking a “maintenance drug” which they do not allow their employees to use. However, this was not a company policy at the time of the interview therefore the use of “maintenance drugs” by employees was not a bona fide occupational qualification for the position. If XYZ Rehabilitation were to have implemented this company policy prior to the interview, then Jane would be unable to sue them. Also, New York is an employment at will state which means a company is not required to give a prospective employee a reason for why they are not being hired. This means that if the interviewer had not given Jane a reason for why she was not being hired then she would not have a right to sue XYZ…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical Marijuana Summary

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Medical Marijuana has taken big steps to advance into legalization. The article “The “Right to Use” Takes Its First Hit: Marijuana Legalization and the Future of Employee Drug Testing” by author Alexis Gabrielson, goes into the laws and details about smokers to protect them. With the help of the three basic appeals; Ethos, Pathos, and Logo’s the author holds a strong argument that will persuade her readers to believe what she is trying to explain. No matter what side you agree with you are either pro-legalization or anti-legalization, Gabrielson’s claim was very clear; if somebody wanted to smoke or use marijuana they should be protected, and any loyal citizen would want the laws to be followed to the correct degree. Although the author didn’t…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The McDonaldization of Wal-Mart Imagine yourself in the following situation: You are running low on food around the house, so you decide to make a trip to stock up on groceries. Of course, you automatically direct your travel to Wal-Mart, because you are a thrifty college student and “save money, live better” right? Wal-Mart boasts low prices and on a minimal budget, that is the best place to go. So you proceed with your quest for groceries. While there, you realize that you are starving!…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Walmart is a corporation that is known not only in the United States but worldwide. The decision point covers the company’s ethics and how it handled a situation that occurred in their Mexico location. This paper will use the ethical decision-making model to identify the facts, ethical issues and the stakeholders. It will also cover the available alternatives, how decisions affect the stakeholders and offer guidance. Determine the facts…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics