Case Study - Two Coaches Essay

884 Words Aug 24th, 2012 4 Pages
Case Study Analysis: A Tale of Two Coaches – Part 3 After reviewing the articles regarding the leadership styles of Coach Knight and Coach Krzyzewski (Coach K), it becomes apparent that each coach displays a very different means of pursuing and obtaining competitive objectives. Generally speaking, Coach Knight displays a strict and rigid leadership style, whereas Coach K’s style seems more personal, sincere, and at times, compassionate. A brief analysis of both Fiedler’s contingency theory and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership II (SLII) model will better illustrate the differences that exist between the coaches and their leadership strategies. Fiedler’s contingency theory is best described as a leader-match framework in which leaders …show more content…
He established trust, loyalty, and self-driven motivation among his players. Consequently, an appropriate task focus followed naturally. Coach K did not need to push his players to perform, because they actually wanted to achieve success. This resulted from what Fiedler would define as a favorable match, or one that includes good leader-follower relations, defined tasks, and strong leader-position power (Northouse, 2010). Though both coaches obtained many victories, Coach K did it without risking his career. Clearly, Coach K illustrated a stronger situational match than Coach Knight when considering Fiedler’s contingency model. Blanchard’s SLII model considers leadership styles, the development of subordinates, and more specifically, the leader’s directive and supportive behaviors (Northouse, 2010). These behaviors help define the model’s four leadership styles: directing, coaching, supporting, and delegating (Northouse, 2010). Coach Knight very obviously falls into the directing category. This style is defined by high directive-low supportive behaviors, and limits leader-member interaction to goal accomplishment and instruction. Using this method, Coach Knight failed to establish relationships with many players – a practice which proved to inhibit trust, loyalty, and respect. Furthermore, Knight prevented his players from achieving a level of full development through which they

Related Documents