Jodi Arias Case Analysis

Improved Essays
I decided to do option #2 major case observation and analysis. The online case I decided to do my research on was the Jodi Arias case. I believe the reason I picked this case over the others was this case was very interesting to me. Sure the O.J. Simpson case was a big one, but we all know he got away with murder. The George Zimmerman’s case didn’t last that long, and I felt that I would just find the same information in my research. This is because in my other class we had to do a research paper on Zimmerman or James Holmes. I found a lot more info on Holmes, then I did Zimmerman. To get to the case proceeding that I viewed, was the defense closing arguments of the Jodi Arias case. This was on May 3rd, 2013. It was trial day 56, and to me …show more content…
If they didn’t think that she was guilty then to 2nd degree murder, and then to manslaughter. There were fifteen jurors on the jury, and they selected three random numbers as a substitute juror. This was so if something happened to one they would replace them with the substitute. I didn’t know that jury number four, is the one responsible for signing and stating the outcome of the verdict. One other thing I didn’t know is each jury member must select what they believe but also, count how many jurors decided premeditated, premeditated and felony …show more content…
As found in my research, “if the twelve cannot unanimously agree, the judge will declare a mistrial, and the defendant will face another long trial in front of a new jury” (Holland, 2006). I believe that they should change this to the majority of the vote. The reason I state this, is some people might believe the person is guilty but don’t want to have on their mind they had an individual’s life taken away. After I learned that there was a mistrial, I searched some more and found that she was retried, and was found guilty of first degree murder. Now they only need to decide if she will get the death penalty or not. The aspect of the court proceeding I will go into further detail, is sentencing.
When Jodi Arias was mistrialed and then trialed again and found guilty of first degree murder one last step needed to be made. To find out if she will be sentenced to death or live in prison the rest of her life without any parole. As we have learned in our previous discussions, getting put on death row is a process. Not only is it a process but a very slow process. This is because the court system wants to make sure that innocent lives are not taken by mistake. There have been a lot of individuals that have been exonerated, because evidence proved their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Bias in the Media against an Acquitted Murderer Murder cases have a unique place in the American judicial court system, especially the case of Casey Anthony and the death of her two year old daughter, Caylee. On July 15, 2008, she was reported missing to 9-1-1 by Cindy Anthony (Grandmother), who said she had not seen Caylee for 31 days and that Casey 's car smelled like a dead body had been inside it. The cops then later interviewed Casey Anthony where she provided a number of falsehoods—including the child was kidnapped—and was charged with first degree murder. The case was later sent to court and after months of testimony and presentation of evidence, the court found her guilty of lies to the police but was acquitted of the first degree…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Couple Jodi Arias and Travis Alexander, a complicated, sex-crazed relationship, ended in a gruesome murder. After just a few months of dating, Arias became filled with jealousy and envy, which drove her to kill Travis Alexander. On June 4th, 2008, hours after having sex with Travis Alexander, Jodi Arias, stabbed him 27 times, slit his throat, and then shot him in the head with .25 caliber handgun while in the shower. The evidence that was collected were photos, DNA, and a palm print all leading to Jodi Arias. The evidence of this case pled Jodi Ann Arias guilty of the murder of Travis Alexander.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jodi Arias Case Study

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jodi Arias: Admitted Killer Topic: Jodi Arias General Purpose: Informing about the Murder Case Specific Purpose: I want to inform everyone on Jodi Arias's background, the murder incident, and her fate. I. Introduction…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout Jodi Arias’ interrogation with Detective Flores, Jodi displayed several obvious signs of deceit – even some pointed out by Flores himself. The most noticeable sign was her stalling mechanisms – it seemed like almost every sentence had one. Her explanations seemed far-fetched and her stories were all over the place. She also exhibited psychological repression – often claiming that she couldn’t remember things. Stalling Mechanisms…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Love and lust was what was desired, but a stabbing incident would make any man wish he ran the other way. Travis Alexander was living a secret life with his ex-girlfriend, Jodi Arias. After a night with Arias, Alexander was found lying on his bathroom floor stabbed 27 times, his throat slit open, and with a bullet through his head. Arias trial started a saga of love, betrayal, and murder that people from around the country wanted to follow. To intrigue the jury and public, the lawyers used multiple forms of evidence to win over their hearts.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Casey Anthony Trial

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not Guilty was the Verdict Felicia Duncan Polk State College CCJ3024 Dr. Raymond Oberg The murder trial that took America by storm. All of America and surrounding Countries was fascinated with the Casey Anthony Trial. She was accused of murdering her daughter Caylee Anthony in 2008.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first case that stuck out with me the most was the In re Gault case of 1967. This case focused on a youth named Gerald Gault who was 15 at the time of the supposed offense. I feel this kid was railroad from the beginning his rights were violated in many ways. He did not receive the right to counsel, notice of charges, questioning of witness because the witness did not show up for the proceedings, protection against self-incrimination, a transcript of the proceeding, nor and appellate review all these things were denied. www.ncjrs.gov I believe it was important in establishing the due process clause of the 14th Amendment which was violated.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Oj Simpson Case

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    January 24, 1995 marked the first day of the events that produced what was nicknamed “ The Trail of the Century” . The first official day of the trial of Orenthal James Simpson versus The People took place in June of 1994 in Los Angeles California when Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found dead outside of Brown’s home. Brown's ex-husband O.J was the first to be notified and questioned upon his return from his Chicago trip. Soon after Nicole’s funeral Simpson failed to surrender to the charges and lead police on a high-speed chase down the 405. After the chase, and much pleading and debate, Simpson “peacefully” went into custody.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hurst Court Case

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Arizona established case law that would be used as precedent for every subsequent case pertaining to the right to trial by jury set by the 6th amendment. The Supreme Court of the United States held in that case that a judge cannot unilaterally identify aggravating factors and sentence defendants to death, which, according to the petitioners, was exactly what happened in Hurst’s case. Florida juries are not asked to make specified findings as to which aggravators they found, much less are they required to agree upon the same aggravator. The grey area lies in the fact that once the jury disclosed its advisory sentence of death, the court had no clue as to which aggravating factor justified their recommendation for Hurst’s sentence. Therefore, it is entirely possible that when the judge conducted his/her separate hearing and determined the existence of the aggravating circumstance (which would then yield a death sentence), he/she completely rejected the jury’s findings, and thus, would have applied an independent understanding of the case and its circumstances to his/her decision to sentence the defendant to death.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bowell Vs Alabama

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alabama and had read briefly about it but after actually reading it more in depth I can easily see why it’s considered one of the most important cases in American history. The doctrine of incorporation would be the fourteen amendments which hold that the Fifth Amendment the right to due process is not only applicable in federal cases but also in those of state case (Samaha). That the courts in Alabama had to give the defendants proper council and time to make their case if they wanted to carry out justice by the standards set by the Constitution. I agree with the majority opinion of the Supreme Court that the lower courts failed to provide the nine defendants with proper rights such as letting a lawyer who was an alcoholic and openly admitted to knowing nothing about Alabama laws (Samaha page 33). It’s surprising that a court would allow someone really no more qualified than any laymen in Alabama to walk into court and argue something they knew nothing about especially when nine individuals lives were on the line.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a homicide investigation, there are many factors which may impact the likelihood of a successful case. In order for a suspect to be convicted on trial, investigative processes must be followed that involve several imperative elements. However, sometimes these procedures aren’t followed and it is in these circumstances that major errors and flaws in the inquiry process are exhibited. It is then due to this that recommendations and frameworks must be created in order to avoid such weaknesses in future cases. Although, sometimes extrinsic factors, such as the influence of the media, may also impact the outcomes of such cases.…

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    005594572 Questions for Arbitration Intro to Law: Contracts 1.a. False. From the opinions presented, it appears that Shelley will lose. Based on the opinions presented, let’s take a lot at the opposing opinions first so we can try to identify who is the majority and who is the dissenting, shall we? the opinions between 4 of the judges so far appear evenly divided, with 2, judges Arnold and burns, saying that the decision of the lower courts should be upheld, and 2, judges Curt and Dan, saying that the decision should be reversed, but when I include the opinion of the 5th judge, it shifts the outlook of the case toward reversing the decision of the lower courts.…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The movie “12 Angry Men” opens to the jury room and fills with twelve juries’ arguments and complain over the murder case. The case was about whether an eighteen year old boy should be found guilty or not guilty about his action. He was accused of killing his father by stabbing him with a knife. The boy’s life is depended on the twelve juries, and those juries are gathered in all different work fields with a little knowledge in criminal justice. The juries began its deliberations; they started to vote and all the jury vote “guilty” except for one, voted “not guilty”.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For class, I watched the court case the State of Florida vs Frantz. The case involved the defendant being accused of rape with the possible lesser charge of assault. I only watched the second half of the court case. I will divide this essay of my observations into 4 sections: the overall procedures, the behavior of parties directly involved, parties indirectly involved and the physical environment of the courthouse to the contrast between reality and courtroom dramas.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics