The issue was whether the company abused the Equal Pay Act by paying the female worker at a lower rate of pay while she was performing generously rise to work inside a similar foundation. The interests court turned around the lower court's concede of outline judgment to the company and remanded the case. The offended party had built up an at first sight instance of pay segregation in view of sex and the company did not give adequate confirmation that the differential was clarified by a factor other than sex.
Not at all like many Equal Pay Act cases, court did not take part in a broad examination of this issue. Be that as it may, it expressed that the record bolsters the conclusion that Vehar, Crosley, and Leipold performed generously meet
Not at all like many Equal Pay Act cases, court did not take part in a broad examination of this issue. Be that as it may, it expressed that the record bolsters the conclusion that Vehar, Crosley, and Leipold performed generously meet