I am not in favorable of going behind a private party search. I realize that under the Fourth Amendment, that I am protected providing that I use the same measure of search as the private party. In contrast to Rowley case, there is no comparison to the case. The Rowley case property was searched by his parents accidentally upon moving the item to prevent them from getting damage. Now, although, Rowley's father found it hidden, apparently he had no desire for them and called an officer that he personally knew to assist in turning the evidence over to protect himself. Therefore, with a second party involved and that I am limited in my search, bring some concern in what more is hidden but not found, in which an opportunity will not be available
