This is a case of the dismissal of Ms K. Kavitha A/P Krishnan (the Claimant) by Aetins Sdn. Bhd. (the Company).
In this case, the Claimant was a Senior HR and Admin Executive and she need to report to the Regional Operations Manager, Ms Saraswathy (COW2). The Claimant got married on 25 April 2012. Her colleagues and her superiors in the Company attended her wedding ceremony, including COW2. Her husband is Mr. Ravi A/L Subramaniam. The Claimant said Ms Cally, Law of the Company was fully aware that he was a real estate agent.
The Claimant had complications in the early stage of pregnancy so she had made frequent visits to the doctor. The Claimant’s medical leave supported by medical certificates issued by Klinik Mohan, was taken by the Company as annual leave, resulting in her annual leave being deducted. It also resulted in a letter dated 21 June 2012 issued by COW2, which the Claimant was asked to show cause on her attendance issue. It was the Claimant's first pregnancy and after undergoing the complications, she underwent a miscarriage. The Claimant said she provided a verbal explanation on COW2's show cause letter.
October 2012, the Claimant was pregnant again and …show more content…
The Claimant confirmed that her husband, Mr. Ravi was not the landlord of the guest house. The Claimant had informed Ms Cally about Mr. Ravi and that he was not the landlord but he was the one who had taken up the tenancy agreement, furnished the place and rented out the property to emigrants and local tenants. The Claimant claimed that Ms Cally had informed her that since the rent was low, they could take up the unit for rental. The fact that Mr. Ravi had met Ms Cally, given his bank details for the monthly rental payment and the tenancy agreement had been prepared but not stamped was because Ms Cally was aware that Mr. Ravi was not the
In this case, the Claimant was a Senior HR and Admin Executive and she need to report to the Regional Operations Manager, Ms Saraswathy (COW2). The Claimant got married on 25 April 2012. Her colleagues and her superiors in the Company attended her wedding ceremony, including COW2. Her husband is Mr. Ravi A/L Subramaniam. The Claimant said Ms Cally, Law of the Company was fully aware that he was a real estate agent.
The Claimant had complications in the early stage of pregnancy so she had made frequent visits to the doctor. The Claimant’s medical leave supported by medical certificates issued by Klinik Mohan, was taken by the Company as annual leave, resulting in her annual leave being deducted. It also resulted in a letter dated 21 June 2012 issued by COW2, which the Claimant was asked to show cause on her attendance issue. It was the Claimant's first pregnancy and after undergoing the complications, she underwent a miscarriage. The Claimant said she provided a verbal explanation on COW2's show cause letter.
October 2012, the Claimant was pregnant again and …show more content…
The Claimant confirmed that her husband, Mr. Ravi was not the landlord of the guest house. The Claimant had informed Ms Cally about Mr. Ravi and that he was not the landlord but he was the one who had taken up the tenancy agreement, furnished the place and rented out the property to emigrants and local tenants. The Claimant claimed that Ms Cally had informed her that since the rent was low, they could take up the unit for rental. The fact that Mr. Ravi had met Ms Cally, given his bank details for the monthly rental payment and the tenancy agreement had been prepared but not stamped was because Ms Cally was aware that Mr. Ravi was not the