Case Study Of Richard's Case

Good Essays
Richard’s case is completely sensitive, anything that can be connected to his trial would be extremely important. So in order to make his legal process with a jury, Richard would have to make great life important decisions. We would need to find facts in which can direct the judge to not incarcerate him at all or just for a short period of time. This would be better than having Richard go through a bench trial. It’s not such a good option to for a judge to make the full decision because that judge can have his mind set on one decision from the beginning.
The key part for the defense side wouldn’t be whether Richard committed or didn’t commit the crime. The main focus would be what his mental state was when his mother was shot and killed. As
…show more content…
I would not have Richard testify in order for him not to be questioned. The three people that I would put the most focus on would be number one Richard’s father and then it would be both his sisters. They would testify on how life was for them and how Richard’s father had a lot to do with the mistreatment. The case would focus on the horrible life that Richard had growing up. And that it’s shocking how his mother didn’t commit suicide just like Richard thought of doing. She wasn’t all mentally there either after the abandonment of her husband and her daughters moving …show more content…
Having his only family turn on him would be devastating and majorly case breaking for Richard. Richard would need not just his family, but any family friend that could help him in this case in order to keep him out of jail. It would be extremely important for Richard to speak up and say whether or not he would go on the stand. The reason for that would be because I would give him the best advice possible to keep him out of jail, but I would need him and want him to be involved. It wouldn’t be like how it happened where he was pretty much manipulated to take plea. When he had absolutely no recognition about his

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Double Jeopardy, in the Fifth Amendment, claims that one cannot be tried twice for the same crime. Once a trial has ended the government cannot choose to include new evidence and put a person on trial again. The right of Double Jeopardy is extremely important because it hinders the government from having the power to continuously try a person for the same crime. To be put on trial multiple times can get expensive, therefore it would make the most sense to only put a person on trial once. Although people should be tried if they have sincerely done something wrong, Double Jeopardy protects the defendants from having to constantly fear that they will be imprisoned.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cesare Beccaria's Thoughts

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages

    His thoughts on death penalty are that we have no right to control whether people have the right to live or die even if there crime is murder. It’s counterproductive to the thought that we are here to assure people there right to live, according to society. Beccaria firmly believes that no one man should ever have the right to condemn one of their life. Another aspect to his belief of death penalty is unnecessary is that is does not have the long term deterrent effect of individuals. Yes, it may stave off murderers for a short period, but it does not have the lasting effect on people to say, I should not do this the last guy that did died.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When Judge Taylor appointed him Atticus knew it was up to him to defend Tom because no one else would defend this case to the best of their ability. There was not a good chance of winning the case, but he knew giving Tom a fair chance was more important than winning. He also knew the town would have their own opinions on this matter because this time period was full of racism and inequality, but his courage to defend his morals outweighed what people thought of…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The family wanted Mike to be thrown in prison, which is where he should have been if he was not mentally ill. The truth was, he needed help. Prison and pleading guilty to a felony were not what was best for him. If the case would have went this way, it would have resolved conflicts with the family, but it would not have been what was truthfully the right thing to…

    • 2203 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion this was not the way to handle the situation. Roger ends up doing the same exact thing to Frank’s family as he did to Rogers family. He threatened the security and safety that Franks family felt before he invades their home. I understand that he was just trying to ensure that his family was safe, but I feel he went to far. He should have involved the police, but I also know how the conflict of rage and instability of the safety of his family would cause him to act in such a way.…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Once they are dead its over no mulligans, so it should be difficult to make this decision. Koch has a great quote where he says; “If government functioned only when the possibility of error didn 't exist, government wouldn 't function at all.” meaning that government his flawed at all levels and should not be trusted with life. The most important replay Koch gives is does the death penalty cheapen the cost of a life. The death penalty must be seen as the ultimate punishment and not throw around. Yes Koch says if you cannot measure the cost of a human life, but murder can be a ruthless crime, but to condemn another man to death is not only costing that man his life but the emotional weight on the judge jury and the…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Still, Hale knew that they were all innocent, but he wanted them to confess anyway so that he may not feel as guilty for taking their lives. In both cases, people wanted the accused to confess to something they had not done. If they had confessed their story would not have been heard, and their would not have been any call to change. Although, Hale was virtuous in wanting them to have their lives, it seemed more so that he wanted them to live for his own benefit. If they had confessed, the crack in the system would still existed until others would die, he did not value those people’s lives because it would have not been his fault.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My job has been preventing me to find a criminal justice related event to observe, and this case came out of the blue. This is in addition to the fact that I found the case extremely interesting. I don’t think that it is fair to judge someone guilty by their demeanor and behavior, but since I am not the judge I do think that Mr. Fugate was guilty. My thoughts on the trial were that even though everyone disagreed with Fugate, I did believe that he did not get a fair trial the first time. I know that juries are supposed to listen to the facts only and make decisions based off of that, but I do understand where Mr. Fugate is coming from when he believes that the jury was biased from the beginning.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Main Juror Jury Functions

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The second principles, on the other hand, requires Jurors to use the law properly when it comes to capital punishment, for if a Juror is telling the judge in Voir Dire that he or she will not convict the defendant if he or she is going to trial for the death penalty, they will not be allow to join the Juror pool (Gardner and Anderson, 2010). No matter what religion the potential Juror is, everyone deserves justice. If, in the eyes of the law, the prosecution demonstrated enough evidence to convict and put someone to death, than it should be done accordingly. The third principle that will exclude a person from become a Jury in a capital case is the mental state of the person, for if the individual has amnesia or dementia, nine times out of ten, the person will be excused from the trial. The court officials need the proper person to remember all the testimonies and evidence obtained so a fair verdict could be given (Gardner and Anderson, 2010).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During any criminal proceeding, the law can either help win the case or lose the case. Every case is unique, whether it is a murder case or a simple assault case. This is why clients need skilled, knowledgeable attorney 's so that they can receive fair trials without police and investigators introducing evidence which may be illegally seized during an arrest. The judge has the ultimate decision whether evidence should be excluded or not, so bringing forth the Constitutional Rights of one 's client is pertinent. Judge Doe is excluding evidence during trial yet the prosecution asked the judge for an Evidentiary Hearing so they can argue their case on why the evidence should be allowed.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays