Case Study Of Richard's Case

Improved Essays
Richard’s case is completely sensitive, anything that can be connected to his trial would be extremely important. So in order to make his legal process with a jury, Richard would have to make great life important decisions. We would need to find facts in which can direct the judge to not incarcerate him at all or just for a short period of time. This would be better than having Richard go through a bench trial. It’s not such a good option to for a judge to make the full decision because that judge can have his mind set on one decision from the beginning.
The key part for the defense side wouldn’t be whether Richard committed or didn’t commit the crime. The main focus would be what his mental state was when his mother was shot and killed. As
…show more content…
I would not have Richard testify in order for him not to be questioned. The three people that I would put the most focus on would be number one Richard’s father and then it would be both his sisters. They would testify on how life was for them and how Richard’s father had a lot to do with the mistreatment. The case would focus on the horrible life that Richard had growing up. And that it’s shocking how his mother didn’t commit suicide just like Richard thought of doing. She wasn’t all mentally there either after the abandonment of her husband and her daughters moving …show more content…
Having his only family turn on him would be devastating and majorly case breaking for Richard. Richard would need not just his family, but any family friend that could help him in this case in order to keep him out of jail. It would be extremely important for Richard to speak up and say whether or not he would go on the stand. The reason for that would be because I would give him the best advice possible to keep him out of jail, but I would need him and want him to be involved. It wouldn’t be like how it happened where he was pretty much manipulated to take plea. When he had absolutely no recognition about his

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Most people did not get a fair trial, although you knew it would lean one way. They get a public trial because if they didn’t one that would be going against the Sixth Amendment, also it would not be a fair trial. If they did not get a public trial for some reason, some people might be suspicious on the trial because it was not a public trial. If it is not public it is not fair, therefore after a non-fair trial, there would be an appeal to reverse the verdict.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of the arguments and issues with the case that he seems to care most about are the knife Juror #8 bought that is similar to the murder weapon and how fast it took the elderly man to get to the door. In Act 1, Juror #4 begins to explain that the knife used is very unusual. That even the store-keeper that sold the knife had never seen a weapon like that before. Juror #8 then argues that someone could have possibly gotten a knife similar to the one the boy had and then “reaches into his pocket and swiftly withdraws a knife...they are exactly alike”(23). Juror #2 finds it “interesting that he’d find a knife exactly like the one the boy bought”(24). Afterwards, the 8th Juror suggests that the elderly man, one of the witnesses, lied because of the point Juror #3 tried to make. Juror #3 says, that the elderly man “[ran] to his door and [saw] the kid tearing down the stairs fifteen seconds after the killing”(42). Juror #8 then suggests that the elderly man could not have done that because of his stroke. He then decides to recreate what the elderly man said he did on the night of the murder. Juror #2 seems really interested in this argument and even volunteers to help with the timing of the experiment. In the beginning of Act 2, the jury decides to vote once more. At the time, Juror #2’s vote was “not guilty.” Even though Juror #2 changes his vote to “not guilty,”…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The trial continued on for a few more days, and though I did not attend, I kept updated on the case. I found out that the defendant continued to show up wearing whatever he felt like, with no regards of his character or respect to the courts. Also, that his demeanor continued to be very poor. He was almost held in contempt of court for disobeying the judge to keep silent. In the end he was sentenced to 19 years in prison. It was also rare, that almost all jurors returned for the sentencing, which most do not attend because they are not made too.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wally Brogue Array

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hello your honor, members of the jury. I am Marim Ibrahim and I will be representing the accused, in the case of Her Majesty the Queen against Wally Brogue. My defendant has been accused of committing first degree murder in the death of Mr. David Bennings on July 14th 2013. This is the case of a caring, optimistic man who simply wanted to do the right thing. Mr.Brogue did not commit this crime. He was naturally upset over his brother having been incarcerated for a crime that Mr.Benning had committed. As a teacher and counsellor, Mr.Brogue believes strongly in the power of talking things out and as a result went to Mr.Bennings apartment in hopes of convincing him to turn himself over. Mr.Brogue is a highly virtuous man who, like all of us in this very room, simply…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Chapter Four, Show Trial, of Amy Bach’s Ordinary Injustice depicts a case of wrongful conviction that occurred over twenty years ago. Michael Evans and Paul Terry, both ages seventeen, had been charged with raping and murdering nine-year-old Lisa Cabassa. The crime occurred the evening of January 14, 1976, when Lisa and her eleven year old brother Ricky were walking to a friend’s house and got separated. Later when Ricky returned home he and his family realized Lisa never made it home. The only witness to Lisa’s abduction was Judy Januszewski, who didn’t come forward until days later. The problem with the case lied in Januszewski’s credibility as a witness when she claimed to have seen the crime occur while her time card at her job indicated…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The facts she gave ended up being all false and she admitted to it on stand after being questioned during a retrial. It was thought Judy gave a false witness statement because she was intimately interested in Michael and he did not reciprocate the feelings. Based off a false statement, two men were almost had their entire life taken away from them and were going to have to rote in jail forever. The article “A Shot to the Heart” explains a case similar to this case, in the sense that a person was wrongfully convicted off the statement of another person. The men in Lisa’s rape and murder case were convicted because a witness claimed to have saw those two men with her at the time of the rape, when in reality they were not. The case in the “A Shot to the Heart” article, explains a man being convicted because he was picked by a witness in a line-up to have been seen involved in the crime. In reality the man who was picked looked identical to the actual man involved, but it was not him, both of these cases are unfair because neither of them give physical evidence indicating it was them who did the…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That right there should give someone a huge reason not to believe that he isn’t guilty. Even though when she was in court, she couldn’t say that she didn’t believe him it is still the matter of the fact that she didn’t. She never fully believed that he was innocent but she still had to defend him because she was his defense attorney and that was his job. As has been mentioned, during their case O’Brien had her doubts, but still tried to help boost Steve’s confidence. He had asked her a question asking what was wrong and she explained to him that the jury believed he was guilty from the moment they laid eyes on him. O’Brien said it was because he is a young black boy on trial for murder. She tried to make him feel better about the situation, but also prepared him for the worst. One may say she did this because she believed that the worst would happen. Subsequently, this proves that Kathy O’Brien was a very good attorney not only because she helped prove him innocent but she also because she tried to make him feel at ease even when she didn’t think things were going to go in his…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    opened with the officer advising him of the Miranda Rights in great detail (FindLaw, n.d.). Michael C. requested to have his probation officer present during the interview when the officer advised him of his right to have an attorney present. The request was denied by the officer, who then again advised Michael C. of his right to have an attorney present during the questioning. The offer to have an attorney present was ultimately refused by Michael C., as he agreed to answer questions without an attorney present. The officer began questioning Michael C. about the murder, a statement as well as sketched were obtained from the interview which incriminates the suspect of the crimes (Elrod & Ryder,…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dick is very fond and attached to his parents such as they are to him while Perry is completely detached to his family. However, the outcome is the same for both. Dick and Perry get capture, which causes much trouble for their families. An example of this case would be with Perry’s sister where she says’’ I wanted to help him. I hoped I might have changed a few of his ideas. Now I know better. The rights of other people mean nothing to Perry. He has no respect for anyone.’’ She is scared for her life knowing that her brother might be out to get her. She also says “But I’m afraid of him…He can seem so warmhearted and sympathetic… Oh, he can fool you. He can make you feel so sorry for him.’’ Even though Perry’s family is broken apart, his sister had tried to save him, but his actions did nothing but push her away causing them to being victims. Dick’s family is the most affected by their crimes. In the courtroom, Dick’s mother says ‘’But it seems to me like people are looking at me and thinking, Well, she must be to blame somehow.’’ The crime has ‘’token’’ away their boy and they cannot believe it. She then says ‘’There is lots more to Dick than what you hear back there in the courtroom.’’ In a way, the crime has caused them in a way to lose their peace because the mere thought of Dick being a killer destroys them. A perfect example of this is when Dick’s mother states…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “It took them only a short time to reach their verdict. “Guilty of murder in the first degree,” said the foreman of the jury” (David 15). The jury disregarded all of the reasonable doubt shown, and declared them guilty without even much deliberation. Despite this verdict, the defense had expected this and were ready to appeal the verdict. New evidence arose after the trial, and this evidence should have cleared the two of all guilt. “Celestino Madeiros, who was a convicted murderer, wrote a letter confessing to all of the crimes Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted of. The lawyers of the defendants began looking into this. His description of the crimes matched almost perfectly to the known facts about the crime, and he was a member of a well known criminal gang that operated in the area of the murder” (David 16). Someone confessing to the crime, especially one that already had a massive criminal record, that should have cleared two men who had evidence against them that produced a lot of reasonable doubt. “The defendants filed 6 notions for another trial, but Judge Thayer denied all of them. When the defense wrote to the court, they backed Judge Thayer” (Costly). The law in the state of Massachusetts was that any appeal for a new trial had to be approved by the judge that originally oversaw the first trial. Judge Thayer was either too stubborn to look bad by overturning his verdict, or too mean to…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I walk into the courtroom, it’s airy, a layer of silence blankets the room, I walk pass Jase's mother, she stares me down, guilt rushes over my body. I know all too well what she thinks of me, and what Jase's situation would be like if I were just to come forward as that third man. I look over to the Lamb, he gives me a reassuring nod, he’s ready to take a bullet for me, go down with a prosecution that could set him back years, and leave a big black mark on his file, the jobs that he could miss out on his future in pieces. I take a good old look at the judge, he’s big broad, looks like he’s been here hundreds of times before, doesn’t piss around.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Morton Case

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Michael Morton was a normal 32 year old father and husband. His wife, Christine Morton, was attacked and killed in their home in Williams County, Texas. (CNN) The crime occurred during the time in which Michael was at work. (CNN) Although, Michael and Christine’s three year old son Eric was at home at the time of the crime. He stated that the man that attacked his mother was a “monster” (?) Eric gave a description of what the man looked like, which concluded that the man who killed his mother was not his daddy. (CNN) In addition, the neighbors also witnessed a man who was seen parking his van behind Morton’s house. (CNN) After the police looked around the Morton house, they came across a bandana that was covered in blood. (CNN) No other evidence of the crime was found, not even the murder weapon. Michael Morton was accused of murder and sentenced to life in prison. (CNN) Even though there was no evidence, the DA Ken Anderson developed a story in which…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Strout is the son of a very wealthy business man that has no problem in using his money to get Richard out of prison. When he makes bail Steve 's parents, Matt and Ruth, are shocked on how the legal system treated this case. Matt states “ I did not think of bail. I thought I wouldn 't have to worry about him for years. She sees him all the time. It makes her cry.” (1124). Matt is talking about how Ruth has to see her sons own murder walk free and that effects her. Terrible psychological pain must come from not only losing a child but seeing the murder walk freely. A quote from the television show American Horror Story does a great job a putting this feeling into words and it says “They say when a parent dies, a child feels his own mortality, but when a child dies, it 's immortality that a parent loses”. It is the parent of the child that is supposed to go first and not the child and when that happens great sorrow surrounds the parent. Richard murdered Steve in cold blood and the punishment should be equal to the crime. The old saying an eye for an eye may apply to this situation. So instead of being able to walk freely and haunt the parents of the victim, Richard should be serving life in prison or maybe even the death penalty for this crime At this point the ethics of the legal system has failed in caring out the right…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Therapy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While in the home, Ian’s brother-n-law murdered his 18-month old daughter, Ian’s niece. Ian mistakenly confessed to the crime because he hit his niece earlier with a toy. After an investigation, Ian’s brother-n-law was found guilty, and he is currently serving a 25-year prison term. Ian’s brother-n-law does not correspond with the family, and it was later determined he was…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Through the discussion, I learned the facts about the case: an old man lives underneath the boy and his father and he heard a fight upstairs, the boy said “I’m gonna kill you” and a body dropped to the ground. The old man saw the boy running downstairs. During the trial, the boy claimed that he had been in the movie theater while his father was murdered, but couldn’t remember a thing about the movie, not even the name of the movie. A woman living across the street, testified that she saw the…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays