Naiker Harvard Business Law Case

Improved Essays
1. (a) Going through Naiker’s case, we will be concluding if there is an enforceable contract or there is not an enforceable contract. In Naiker’s case, Ahmad is the offeror and Naiker himself is the offeree. Basically, Naiker somehow developed an interest in playing the piano, and he wanted to purchase a second hand piano for learning purposes. Ahmad knew about it and he decided to post an offer by letter to Naiker to sell his piano on Monday 2 June stating, “Good quality piano for sale $2,500. If you are interested in buying you must write to me.” After posting the letter out, there was a postal strike out of the blue. Hence, The letter only reached Naiker on Thursday 5 June. Naiker was pleased and excited after receiving the offer, and in …show more content…
There are numerous approaches to cure a breached contract, including damages. The sorts of damages are, unliquidated damages, liquidated damages, nominal damages, and special damages. Beginning off with unliquidated damages, it alludes to unascertained harms, whereby the sum will be controlled by court, considering the contract overall and the misfortune maintained by the oppressed party. Liquidated damages allude to pre-estimated harms, which have been settled upon by the party. Such damages are reasonably a typical place today. For instance, if a phone contract of two years is ended before the two-year period, the concurred liquidated sum is payable. Nominal damages allude to an nominal whole ($2) recompensed to the offended party when there is simply a minor or specialized rupture of the agreement. However, the offended party endures no misfortune. By and large, the harmed party is looking for the court's choice instead of payment. Frequently sort of damages is looked for in criticism cases. Furthermore, special damages whereby this remunerates the inquirer for the quantifiable financial misfortunes, which they are seen in both individual and business activities. Different sorts of damages are accessible under equity, for example, specific performance and …show more content…
This equitable remedy requests the breaching party to conform to the terms of the agreement. This implies that the breaching party will be obliged to do whatever the party initially guaranteed to do. The court will consider this alternative when cash harms won't give the guiltless party sufficient remuneration for the breach. Specific performance is most regular in deals contracts. This remedy is in some cases utilized when a deals contract includes something exceptional. An alternate equitable remedy is injunction, which is a cure that precludes a party from a specific demonstration. Note that specific performance and injunction remedies are comparative, yet the key distinction is that specific performance requests a party to do something, and an injunction requests a party not to do

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Exemplary damages will be awarded to punish the party in default. Amount of damages how much plaintiff will recover is according to the rule of qualify the losses. If the loss cannot be accurately quantified a court will engaged a “guesswork” in order to make an order for damages (e.g. Howe v Teefy (1927) 27 SR (NSW)301). Generally, A plaintiff can sue for either liquidated or unliquidated damages or both of them because of breach of contract, whereas liquidated refers to an amount specified in the contract, while unliquidated is not.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The significance of civil agreements can vary in today’s society depending upon the diverse circumstances that exist when an agreement takes place. Civil law including civil agreements, deals with disputes between private parties and negligent acts that cause harm to others. To avoid the possibility of private parties committing criminal acts to recover their property, they may claim compensation directly from the wrong doer who is deprived of the benefits of unlawful conduct. (Raff, 2013)1. Civil law also deals with breach of contracts.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    • Some clauses are also included in contract that determines that if unintended events are faced, one party or both parties will not be responsible. These are exclusion clauses that also affirm the payments, actions and duration of time that the contract would remain valid. • The contract terms and conditions are bound to be corresponding to Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. Only when other party accepts the offer, creates a legally binding business contract. The above key points are needed to be complied with, in order to avoid any issues that may be countered in future.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When evaluating the employment status, it becomes important to reflect upon the reality of a particular contract, rather than just considering certain sham terms. For instance, the main issue taken into account by the Supreme Court while handling dispute, the written contract should outline the actual relationship nature between parties. However in certain scenarios, the written terms can even be disregarded by taking into account what the parties have initially agreed upon if the written term of the contract is not a genuine reflection of the true relationship. The decision was aligned with the judgement made during Consistent Group Ltd vs. Kalwak case. In the stated case, the reality of a situation was taken into account, instead of any contractual provision.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In terms of clean hands, the claimant may be disentitled to an equitable remedy if he is guilty of some impropriety connected to the contract. In terms of hardship, specific performance may be refused if hardship will be caused to either of the parties or a third party (Mithell 2010, pp.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Injuria And Tort-Feaser

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At this stage, it will be useful to refer to some formal definitions of tort by various authorities. Frazer defines it ‘as an infringement of a right in rem of a private individual’ which gives rise to a ‘right to compensation in a suit brought by the injured party’ ( an injured person is one whose right has been violated). According to…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Indian Oil Case Study

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As innocent parties, contributors were also entitled to recover damages from the wrongdoer. In brief, as discuss above, when tangible property is mixed so as to form a bulk, the rights of the original owners will always vary depending upon the intention of the parties and whether the property can be divided between them…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For instance, early notice of the availability to play and notice of reserving the right to bail out. Lastly, it would be unjust and unconscionable if the promise is not enforced. Unconscionable departure is dependence upon all the circumstances of the case including the reasonableness of the conduct of promisee in adopting the assumption and extent…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liquidated Damages Essay

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Genuine pre-estimate of damages and punitive interpretation of Article 74 differentiate between. The penalty will be a sum of money, which is specified in order to discourage people from breach of contract. When one of the contractual obligations of…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A contract is an agreement that legally binds the parties involved. Alternatively, it can be defined as a promise or a set of the same that are enforceable by law. By getting into an agreement, parties acquire obligations and rights which are enforceable by the court of law. The main method through which such agreements may be enforced is by the award of damages although in many cases the court may order the defaulting party to perform a specific action to compensate the aggrieved party. In addition to that, there has to be evident communication between the two parties involved for an agreement to be considered as binding the parties involved.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays