Serious Emotional Disturbance Case Summary

It is often assumed that mental illness increases the likelihood that an individual will commit violent acts (Elbogen & Johnson, 2009). When examining Chuck’s case, it may be difficult to determine his guilt based on his criminal history, his experience with Serious Emotional Disturbance (SED), and the evidence that is being used against him. In order to determine how Chuck’s case should be handled and what type of punishment he receives, it is crucial to examine his history of SED and its symptoms, as well as the accuracy of witness statements and false-confessions. Armstrong, Dedrick, and Greenbaum (2003) recognize that adolescents and young adults with SED have poor social skills, often act impulsively, have limited academic achievement, and higher reports of psychiatric conditions and conduct disorders. Substance abuse rates are also higher for individuals with SED when compared to individuals who do not have SED. This study revealed that young adults with SED have …show more content…
They did acknowledge that environmental stressors and individuals who experience co-occurring severe mental illness and substance abuse have a higher likelihood of violence, which indicates that mental illness alone does not produce violence (Elbogen & Johnson, 2009). This is important when examining Chuck’s case, primarily because it is possible that he may have a substance abuse disorder along with his mental illness. If Chuck does have a substance abuse disorder, when combined with SED and his criminal history, he may be at a higher risk for future violent or criminal behavior. Due to the limited amount of information provided about Chuck’s individual situation, it is difficult to determine. Predicting violent or criminal behavior is difficult and is not always accurate. Although Chuck may be seen as being highly likely to engage in such behaviors, it is not guaranteed that he