• ance its readiness to launch new PFS projects in workforce development space, as required by the SIF, and create a blueprint for replication in other jurisdictions.
• ABC Service Provider sets really well with most of the feasibility assessment objectives, set by Abt Associates and National League of Cities, in its application to Third Sector’s SIF competition, except in establishing a value proposition for a potential government sponsor. This impediment, however, could easily overcome considering the stakeholders have already established knowledge based trust.
• The feasibility assessment scrutinizes the PFS project readiness to move forward with construction and launch, identifies structural or systematic changes to be implemented by …show more content…
• Data sources, collected from multiple stakeholders such as community college partners and end payer would play a large role in approaching PFS more analytically and efficiently. Utilizing WIOA individual state systems could successfully target the right audience.
• Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) and Propensity Score Matching (PSM) provides the service providers with constructive and experimental methodologies for evaluating impact of the Professional Training Corps (PTCs). Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) identified in such trials can help evaluate the effectiveness of the courses more effectively, especially considering the heterogeneous nature of the population.
• PFS projects are multi-year, multi-party performance based contract and, hence, are required to be treated as such. The construction phase must bring together all the key parties involved in order to agree on specific …show more content…
Having a separate and detailed description of each interest player or stakeholder at the beginning of the document can certainly help the reader bring pieces together as they get more information later in the document.
• Executive summery should elaborate key points about the PFS landscape, as provided in the bullet points above.
• PFS Readiness Scale is a very important part of an assessment information. Following the color code throughout the remaining of the report can certainly help the reader auto relate to each granular scale. It should follow a standardized format as to how to present the information. For instance: o Description o Granular level intervention analysis o Financial and operational detail of PTC intervention o Identifying key indicators of a scale o Summery o Recommendation
Positive features of the report itself (form, style, substance):
• The report provides a comprehensive detail on the Pay for Success program and how it brings together multiple stakeholders from across industries.
• Recommended Next Step and Questions at the end of each readiness assessment provide very important anticipatory information to be gathered upon the execution of the PFS project. This adds a great value to the knowledge of the
• ABC Service Provider sets really well with most of the feasibility assessment objectives, set by Abt Associates and National League of Cities, in its application to Third Sector’s SIF competition, except in establishing a value proposition for a potential government sponsor. This impediment, however, could easily overcome considering the stakeholders have already established knowledge based trust.
• The feasibility assessment scrutinizes the PFS project readiness to move forward with construction and launch, identifies structural or systematic changes to be implemented by …show more content…
• Data sources, collected from multiple stakeholders such as community college partners and end payer would play a large role in approaching PFS more analytically and efficiently. Utilizing WIOA individual state systems could successfully target the right audience.
• Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) and Propensity Score Matching (PSM) provides the service providers with constructive and experimental methodologies for evaluating impact of the Professional Training Corps (PTCs). Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) identified in such trials can help evaluate the effectiveness of the courses more effectively, especially considering the heterogeneous nature of the population.
• PFS projects are multi-year, multi-party performance based contract and, hence, are required to be treated as such. The construction phase must bring together all the key parties involved in order to agree on specific …show more content…
Having a separate and detailed description of each interest player or stakeholder at the beginning of the document can certainly help the reader bring pieces together as they get more information later in the document.
• Executive summery should elaborate key points about the PFS landscape, as provided in the bullet points above.
• PFS Readiness Scale is a very important part of an assessment information. Following the color code throughout the remaining of the report can certainly help the reader auto relate to each granular scale. It should follow a standardized format as to how to present the information. For instance: o Description o Granular level intervention analysis o Financial and operational detail of PTC intervention o Identifying key indicators of a scale o Summery o Recommendation
Positive features of the report itself (form, style, substance):
• The report provides a comprehensive detail on the Pay for Success program and how it brings together multiple stakeholders from across industries.
• Recommended Next Step and Questions at the end of each readiness assessment provide very important anticipatory information to be gathered upon the execution of the PFS project. This adds a great value to the knowledge of the