Case Study: Mangsa Dipenjarakan

Improved Essays
This case main issue is discuss about the words ‘mangsa dipenjarakan’ was the same meaning with ‘imprisonment’, the defense counsel Mr. Karpal Singh argue that the words has other meaning in several dictionary, but the judge disagree with the statement state by Mr. Karpal Singh, he only prefer the meaning from Shorter Oxford English Dictionary which says that prison is ‘penjara’. The judge claimed that he was further explained in the court that the 16 year old girl was stay in protective custody with the agree of her father under S 8(4) a) of the Women and Girls Protection Act, it does not mean she was imprisoned (Cijmalaysia, 2015). But the pamphlet entitled seen as distort the original meaning of the words, intend to send wrong information …show more content…
Lim Guan Eng as having attacked the judiciary, he help a Malay grandmother of the underage girl to fight back the human rights and women rights of her underage grand-daughter and against the Malacca Chief Minister, Tan Sri Rahmin Thamby Chik (Lim, 2015). He expressed he is disappointed with the court decision to place an underage girl stay in a welfare home for three years, but the prisoner Tan Sri Rahmin get acquitted by the court (Abu, 2015). Mr. Lim Guan Eng was censure The Attorney-General Tan Sri Mohtar Abdullah for his unfair handling of the cases of Rahim Thamby Chik and the underaged girl. The Attorney-General lacks credibility when he claims that charges against Mr. Lim Guan Eng are not politically-motivated, he should explain more credible reason to Malaysian and the world about why he ensure that the pamphlet will undermine the judiciary and the administration of justice in this country (Lim, …show more content…
In November 1986, a reform group Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran (Aliran) applied for a permit to publish a Bahasa Malaysia version of their magazine called “Seruan Aliran”, but their application was rejected by the Minister without any reason. Aliran brought the matter to the High Court for a judicial review of the Minister absolute right in granting permit, this aspect show that the Minister’s jugdement in favour of Aliran case although the application for the permit according to law. The High Court ruling Harun J noted that although the right of Minister is absolute, but not unfettered, he can’t just simply reject any application without any reason, he had no “good reason” in refusing Aliran’s application. (Cijmalaysia,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Barangaroo Case Study

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Task-The main issues revolving around the redevelopment of the Barangaroo Over-view: Barangaroo is an ongoing urban renewal project on a former container wharf on the western harbour foreshore of the Sydney CBD. It is 22 hectares in size and will cost roughly $6 billion in order to recreate and redefine the entirety of the western edge of Sydney’s Harbour. It will provide over 11 hectares that will be able to be accessed by the public and community. This site will also provide over 24,000 permanent jobs and generate around $2 billion per annum to the NSW economy. It is owned by the NSW Government but the project is managed by the Barangaroo Delivery Authority.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It will highlight the power comparison between the two government bodies. The High Court’s decision is the final say; therefore the examination of what would occur if the High Court found reasoning for a statute to be unconstitutional. Finally the misinterpretation of the unconstitutional statute…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As you are reading this article today, remember that although Aboriginal people make up only 3% of Australia’s total population, they represent over 28% (9,940 adult prisoners) of Australia’s prison population in 2015 and this number is rising. To combat this issue, the Murri Court was established. The Murri Court was founded in Queensland in 2002 in response to the increasing representation of Indigenous Australian people in prison. This court sentences Indigenous offenders who plead guilty to offences which fall within the jurisdiction of the Magistrates Court, for example assault or theft.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Triptan Case Study Essay

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Case 2: Drug selection in treatment of migraine-Triptan Migraine is a severe headache felt as a throbbing pain at the front or side of the head. Triptan, the 5-hydroxytryptamine agonists are widely used as first-line abortive therapies for migraine headache patients. The currently available triptans offer clear evidence of improved clinical and economic outcomes compared with previous anti-migraine therapies, such as ergotamine alkaloids. However, the clinical and economic benefits of triptans are ambiguous. Hence, a triptan case study was carried out to introduce a systematic methodology to assist formulary decision makers in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of drugs within a category based on readily available data.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this report for a non-governmental organization, Mclemore uses personal stories and examples from the USA to portray mandatory minimum sentencing as a lousy policy that should not be enacted in Canada. Mclemore highlights the negative aspects of such a policy that would take Canada in the wrong direction with its policy on crime. Her examples of these ‘tough on crime’ policies failing in the USA are especially convincing as it sheds light on the practice contributing negatively in past experiences. Mclemore is a senior researcher in the Health and Human rights division of the Human rights Watch. The Human Rights Watch is an enormous international non-governmental organization with an expenditure of almost 70 million in 2014.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Short Essay # 3: Case Study: MOSI - Somasekhara Reddy Medam What three strategies should MOSI adopt in responding to its Fowler Avenue land problem? Tampa Museum of Science and Industry (MOSI) is being operated by an independent non-profit foundation.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sublimation of the assault weapons that were given out could cause both crime and tax would increase and new laws will be enforced. Noticing that assault rifles are not even required to use while hunting, the government already gives out shotguns and pistols. It’s not the gun, but the person who pulls the trigger, but some people want to give that irresponsible individual a weapon of mass destruction. The creation of an assault rifle caused the flow of war to change, think of what it could cause the U.S to turn into.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    750-1,000 words in which you describe the procedural steps in a criminal trial. An evolution has established the current the state of criminal trials. There exists, on both the State and federal level, a mostly standardized set of procedures. In this set of standardized procedures, a typical trial would be inclusive of beginning with the selection of trial type, a middle that would discuss evidentiary issues, and end; sentencing.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case study, State v. Selalla (2008), involves Kevin Ballesillo Selalla (Selalla) who was charged in South Dakota on 27 July 2005 for drug possession, drug dealing intent and assuming fake identities intended to mislead law enforcement. Prior to the trial, Selalla claimed having limited knowledge of English and in response, the trial court hired a Spanish/English interpreter to assist Selalla. However, the Public Defender’s office took liberty in hiring another interpreter to facilitate communication between the defense counsel and Selalla. The trial court then dismissed the interpreter it had hired citing that retaining more than one publicly-funded interpreter is unwarranted. This analysis seeks to examine the role and administration of courtroom interpreters.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Local Court Case Study

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Introduction Whilst observing criminal proceeding in the local, district and supreme courts, the intricate workings of the legal system within Australia became extremely apparent. It became clear during my time in court that the administration, process and practices of each court varied extremely depending on which level you were observing at the time. Similarly during such time spent in court, the distinctions between both summary proceeding and trail upon indictment became clear and could be seen to somewhat mirror McBarnet’s theory of the ‘two tiers of justice’. Within this theory McBarnet argues that, the higher courts are seen as an “arena where the ideology of justice is put on display”.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    compromise of conflicting rights which need to be achieved through a constitutional justification. The Court's decision makes the important declaration that safety and other concerns must be clearly established before an infringement of freedom of religion is justified. Similarly the Multani decision also provides insight to the proper relationship between administrative decisions and the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms in Canada. Given the Charter the charter has existed for over two decades, both courts and administrative tribunals have not yet clearly defined the exact boundaries between numerous rights and freedoms contained therein.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    NAMI Case Study Essay

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case study is going to be about National Alliance on Mental Illness and the affects school shootings have on NAMI’s organization. I discuss the impact it has on NAMI as a nationwide organization but focus more on the impact it has on NAMI York County. I learned a lot about NAMI by doing this case study. One day I might be able to help someone with a mental illness get help just from my research on NAMI. I know a lot more about the mission of NAMI and the programs they offer.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are currently five non-fatal offences against the person which are contained within two statutes, namely the Criminal Justice Act (CJA) 1988 and the Offences Against the Person’s Act (OAPA) 1861, as well as being developed within common law. Firstly the law is not codified under one piece of legislation. As the law of non-fatal offences against the person cannot be found within one statute – this makes the law unnecessarily complex. This complexity can be hard for the jury to understand as the OAPA 1861 doesn’t clearly establish what must be proven for each offence which is undemocratic, unconstitutional and goes against the separation of powers but also doesn’t make any clear reference to the Mens Rea (MR) of a crime.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abstract Judicial review allows judges to review the lawfulness of a decision or action by a public body exercising a public role. Judicial review is concerned with how the law is being applied, along with the procedures followed. It is known to be one of the most effective and powerful institutions capable of convincing a public body to review a decision and to a certain extent force them to take different actions. The power granted to judicial courts has allowed emerging controversy on behalf of many public segments since it is perceived as a threat to democracy and the legitimacy of the government and the according constitution. Therefore, questions like what are the reasons that drive governments to intentionally constrain themselves by…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Does the new constitutional dispensation warrant a shift in approach to judicial review on the ground of errors of law from the common law approach? If so why and in what way? If not, why? The new constitutional dispensation warrants a shift in the approach to judicial review on the ground of errors of law from the common law approach. This essay will argue that the shift has already occurred, but it is not a case of leaving the old ways of doing things in the past.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays