Case Study: Human Dignity And Capital Punishment

Improved Essays
Veronica Waters S00169400
Tutor Name: Jen Koch

Veronica Waters S00169400
Tutor Name: Jen Koch

Uncc300 assessment task 2: case study
Case Study 2: Human Dignity and Capital Punishment

This essay will discuss human dignity and capital punishment. Human dignity is a critical factor because this is someone?s life that could be ended because of people?s different views on dignity and it challenges the significance of human dignity from different perspectives. This issue of human dignity and the capital punishment will be explored through two different perspectives. The first perspective to be examined is perspective two; that people that are found guilty of a major crime should be given the chance to rehabilitate themselves and restore their
…show more content…
This perspective will be explored through the relation of this perspective to human dignity and the justification of the perspective. The reading that supports this perspective is that of Conquergood (2002). Conquergood (2002) looks at the way in which humans are faced with capital punishment and how it has always been a public affair to show society that if you commit criminal acts then you will be subject to capital punishment. The quadrant that is most evident in this reading is 2B. Quadrant 2B is defined as ?dignity that humans can acquire or lose through moral or immoral behaviour: humans acquire dignity when they behave well in society, but can also lose it when they behave badly? (ACU, 2016, section. 2.1.3). Capital punishment is considered justified because it gives closure to the victims? families and to society that if someone does something bad then they will have to face the consequences. This reading fits into quadrant 2B because most of the arguments made are that capital punishment is right because it gives closure and argues that if you do something wrong society needs to see that the person will face capital punishment because they have committed this …show more content…
This was examined by exploring perspective two that enables offenders to be able to rehabilitate themselves and hold the values of quadrant 2A. and perspective three was also explored which considers capital punishment to be justified as the offenders have lost their dignity in relation with quadrant 2B. And finally, the many dimensions of humans was explored and the importance of viewing human dignity as multidimensional. Capital punishment is a complex issue that needs to be considered from a multidimensional

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    First, the use of this perspective is in place to help restore moral order in a society. Also, a goal of this use of societal punishment is to punish to re-establish the norms a society has developed. In addition, a fairness standard is in place, and if a person is not punished then the community will feel as if they were treated unfairly. This would be unjust to them and would give the offender an advantage he or she does not deserve. The utilitarian perspective on punishment also has various goals.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Punishment is justified, for a retributivist, solely by the fact that those receiving it deserve it.” For a retributivist the reasoning for killing a criminal would be justified, because they committed an act that makes it acceptable for them to be killed. An eye for an eye is a phrase used with retributive theory. Another theory that also is for capital punishment is the utilitarian theory. For a utilitarian there reasoning for capital punishment is somewhat different. They feel that capital punishment is justified by a purported ability to achieve future social benefits, such as crime reduction.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deterrence is the Utilitarian approach to punishment and could justify the moral argument for the punishment of offenders. The belief is that there is a certain system that is designed to deter criminal behaviour and that crimes must be dealt with robustly. There are two main types of deterrence, individual and general deterrence. Individual deterrence is concerned with the offender itself in committing criminal acts and the psychological thinking as opposed to general deterrence which is a message aimed at the wider community or public (Scott and Flynn, 2014). Preventing future crimes through punishment was an idea that developed from the respected works of Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Criminal law has been shaped by various ideas about its purposes (Duff, 2002a in Crime and Justice). One purpose served by the criminal law is to ensure that those who act wrongly receive the pain which is their just desert (Johnston and Ward 2010, 8). This simply put means that the community expectations of the criminal justice system is to see a wrongdoer reprimanded for his or her crime. The Elizabethan era is a prime example of this, as punishment for crime was often a public spectacle and in the form of hanging or flogging. The criminal justice system was also thought to shape human conduct.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many factors taken into consideration when individuals commit crimes such as, the punishment one would receive, the success they would receive and who it would benefit. Crime is broken for personal reasons, it is a cost benefit analysis (Hayward, 2007). The offender determines the advantage of criminal behaviour. Rational choice theory assumes that an individual is egotistic (Boudon, 2003). It is perceived that an individual who commits an unlawful act is mainly concerned with only themselves.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Nguyen Enforce Capital Punishment Capital punishment should be enforced because people who have committed crimes and broke the law should be punished in proportion to their crime. Capital punishment is a severe punishment; however the person who committed the crime opened themselves to the consequences. In a Virtue Ethics point of view the death penalty is a more personal theory and that it is up to a person’s virtues. Capital punishment can be supported based on the idea of retributivism which is the theory that a criminal should pay back for the crime they inflicted onto others. Capital punishment is about justice for those affected by crimes people have committed.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Punishment In Corrections

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Retribution may seem similar to revenge; however, retribution serves as a suitable punishment that is equivalent to damage that was caused to wronged victims. Furthermore, one other purposes of retribution “is not to make the wicked "suffer," but to restore social balance” (Bradley, 2003, p. 30). Once the offender has paid their dues for the crime that they committed, the offender is free from further punishment. The second concept that is part of the foundation of corrections includes incapacitation. Incapacitation involves placing offenders into incarceration in order to prevent further harm to society.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When a child does something wrong, you talk to the child find out why they did it. Then you punish the child in the way you see fit (spanking, taking something away, etc.) Until they learn to not do it again, but you also have to do this all with love. If the criminal justice system would take this into consideration they would have less problems. To be able to give punishment, but to be able to rehabilitate that person would be the best thing for society, and the criminal justice…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The benefit of this is that the criminal is punished instead of the crime as it draws focus to the individual’s actions and their mental state at the time the offence was committed. Although the model of individual responsibility has been criticised by the science community for their beliefs on free will and human behaviour not reflecting the current research, the model is an effective and just model that can deliver justice correctly. If, however the model does not deliver the wanted results, an alternative model to use is strict liability, as it punishes offenders in a swift and proficient…

    • 1587 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A just sentence would examine the characteristics of a crime to determine the culpability of the offender, and maintain the overall harmony of the harmed group of individuals. In another word, the retributivist argument of a just punishment may sound appealing, but it would destroy the balance of the society as it disregards the Equal Protection of the Fourth Amendment. Meanwhile, the consequentialist approach to hate crime may seen to be against the idea of the tough crime policies, but it somehow protects both the offender and the victim by aiming for the long term effect of deterring future hate crimes. Overall, there are pros and cons in regards to both theories and the statutes they coincided with. However, in my opinion, I would want to see statutes to incorporate the concepts from expressive theory of punishment.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics