*The Lord of the Rings, by J&R Tolkien, is essentially about the struggle between good and evil. However, due to recent global developments, it has been interpreted by many as the war between Christians and Muslims, even though there is no such reference made in either the book or movie.
*There are certain dimensions of culture, like the sense of style or aesthetics that might be influenced by movies, and realize a longer impact.
*Some sensitive dimensions of culture will backfire if attacked, and may beseech strong criticism, i.e. “religion and belief systems”, “social institutions”, or “values and attitudes”.
*Films may affect some cultural aspects, however the deeply ingrained values will not be changed, and thus the impact is minimal at best: Fashion- yes, …show more content…
*The influence of professional and corporate culture tends to grow as people are socialized into a profession and workplace.
*Corporate and professional cultures are embedded in national cultures.
*Movies are both dependent and independent variables when it comes to national, professional and corporate cultures. Films both influence and are a result of these three overlapping cultures. As culture permeates business on several levels, invariably, managerial tasks, company activities and worldwide business transactions are mirrored in films, and vice versa, movies capture worldwide business activities and other ways of doing business around the world.
*We emulate role models, whether they perform in films or in corporations. Indeed, we can learn about different cultures and languages recognizing that what is significant in one culture may not be commensurately important in another culture.
*Watching foreign films can be an effective way of learning about: -Interpersonal exchanges- greeting and parting rituals
-How far apart to stand, what to say, and whether to touch or …show more content…
With freedom, also comes responsibility. Freedom means respecting the rights of others.
*Protectionism jeopardizes freedom of speech. It fosters host-country film-makers while reducing individual freedom of choice in terms of the population of films to choose from.
*Regulation acts in opposition to the free market. Why not let the invisible hand of the market dictate which films, or other cultural industries should be profitable? Regulation only leads to inefficiencies and away from market economies, a direction not commensurate with global political/economic forces.
*One way to mitigate the tension between Hollywood and Europe, might be to form a Film Consortium, which might consist of government authorities, known movie critics, and filmmakers from different European/American perspectives. This consortium would be charged with identifying whether or not attacks/negative stereotypes were present, and label the movie as potential for cultural conflicts. In this way, those who may be culturally offended have been duly