I reviewed the case study “Ethical Response to Sickness” by group 6. The group did a good job presenting the facts. Ethical principles were correctly identified. I believe it good and fair to provide medical service to anyone in need regardless of their immigration status/ legal status. The group identified 5 stakeholders. The ethical decision making process was not so easy to follow/clear. The pros and cons of each option presented were weighed. The group offered primary and secondary decision. Although am not sure of the rationale behind the hospital and physician absorbing cost is not clear. Final decision was made however, I do not quite agree am not sure if I agree with the primary decision that suggest physicians should absorb the most
