Facts.
Mr and Mrs Murray were the parents of the claimant of whom Mrs Murray was famous for writing harry porter books. The claimant was 19 months old when the pictures of him and his family were taken by the respondent Big pictures and published by Sunday express magazine without their approval.
Mr and Mrs Murray sued the company on behalf of David. Although the claimant and respondent spoke to each other to address the issue which led to an agreement, there was a breach of agreement on the respondent’s side. The family brought the case to the court to collect all the pictures the BPL had and to prevent more pictures from been published.
During the court hearing, the claimant presented their evidence and claimed that taking the pictures was a breach of confidence and invasion of privacy under article 8 of the ECHR and Data …show more content…
The protection of privacy has paved way for a number of activies such as freedom of press.
In the end, we can truly say that the law brought about enlightenment and awareness in the society.
BIBLOGRAPHY:
Cases.
Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 A.C. 457
Hosking v Runting [2005] 1 NZLR 1,
Murray v BPL [2008] EWCA Civ 446, [2009] Ch. 481
Von Hannover v Germany (App no. 59320/00) [2005] 40 EHRR 1
Articles.
Statues and statutory instruments.
European convention of human rights 1950 s 1 (8)
European convention of human rights 1950 s 1 (10)
Data protection act 1998, s 13(1).
Books
Wacks R, Privacy And Media Freedom (1st edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013) (-- removed HTML --) accessed 29 October 2017
Website
Brimsted K and smith j, 'J. K. Rowling Photo Case - The Boundaries of Privacy Continue to Grow | Lexology' (Lexology.com, 2008) (-- removed HTML --) accessed 29 October
Mr and Mrs Murray were the parents of the claimant of whom Mrs Murray was famous for writing harry porter books. The claimant was 19 months old when the pictures of him and his family were taken by the respondent Big pictures and published by Sunday express magazine without their approval.
Mr and Mrs Murray sued the company on behalf of David. Although the claimant and respondent spoke to each other to address the issue which led to an agreement, there was a breach of agreement on the respondent’s side. The family brought the case to the court to collect all the pictures the BPL had and to prevent more pictures from been published.
During the court hearing, the claimant presented their evidence and claimed that taking the pictures was a breach of confidence and invasion of privacy under article 8 of the ECHR and Data …show more content…
The protection of privacy has paved way for a number of activies such as freedom of press.
In the end, we can truly say that the law brought about enlightenment and awareness in the society.
BIBLOGRAPHY:
Cases.
Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 A.C. 457
Hosking v Runting [2005] 1 NZLR 1,
Murray v BPL [2008] EWCA Civ 446, [2009] Ch. 481
Von Hannover v Germany (App no. 59320/00) [2005] 40 EHRR 1
Articles.
Statues and statutory instruments.
European convention of human rights 1950 s 1 (8)
European convention of human rights 1950 s 1 (10)
Data protection act 1998, s 13(1).
Books
Wacks R, Privacy And Media Freedom (1st edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013) (-- removed HTML --) accessed 29 October 2017
Website
Brimsted K and smith j, 'J. K. Rowling Photo Case - The Boundaries of Privacy Continue to Grow | Lexology' (Lexology.com, 2008) (-- removed HTML --) accessed 29 October