As Vice President of Recruitment, my goal is to shape the process in a way that promotes class bonding while maintaining their GPA, or even seeing an increase in their GPA. I’ve created this case for a 6 week process to show how that is possible within 6 weeks rather than an unnecessary 7 week process.
With these new changes that I plan on bringing to the process it will guarantee that new members have the time to study and not fall behind in classes because they are not worrying about trivial things such as greetings, 24/7 unity, and inappropriate interview questions. Instead their time will be properly allocated to activities such as formal library hours and professional interviews. While it may seem this can be accomplished just as easily …show more content…
Since the 6 week process and the 7 week process have the same exact oncalls, with a minor difference in spacing, that means the time spent for week 6 oncalls (77hrs) will be approximately the same for a 7 week process. The major difference will be what composes the majority of the week, the weekdays. Adding another week, adds another 5 days of meals, library hours, and other unnecessary events that overall isn’t beneficial. Once again, if you refer to the “Process Time Evaluation”, the difference between a 6 week process and a 7 week process is an extra 62hrs of the new members time wasted on meals, interviews, library hours, and unity days. Rather than wasting 62hrs, why not minimize the mental stress we are causing on new members and the academic stress that’s also current in our …show more content…
My goal is to shape the process in a way that promotes class bonding while maintaining their GPA, or even seeing an increase in their GPA. It is my job as Vice President of Recruitment to oversee rush week and the process, however I am truly offended that I must go to such lengths to enforce a decision I’ve made after carefully exploring all of the options. It is also truly offensive when the NMEs go behind my back and share the oncall schedules to Kat, who has no actual knowledge of the process behind the scene, for “risk management” to provide a case against my decision. So at this point and time, my decision is final and the process will be 6 weeks with no compromises. If you, as the President of this fraternity, can bring a valid argument against my decision to the table then I will be more than willing to reconsider a 7 week process, but in the meantime my decision is
With these new changes that I plan on bringing to the process it will guarantee that new members have the time to study and not fall behind in classes because they are not worrying about trivial things such as greetings, 24/7 unity, and inappropriate interview questions. Instead their time will be properly allocated to activities such as formal library hours and professional interviews. While it may seem this can be accomplished just as easily …show more content…
Since the 6 week process and the 7 week process have the same exact oncalls, with a minor difference in spacing, that means the time spent for week 6 oncalls (77hrs) will be approximately the same for a 7 week process. The major difference will be what composes the majority of the week, the weekdays. Adding another week, adds another 5 days of meals, library hours, and other unnecessary events that overall isn’t beneficial. Once again, if you refer to the “Process Time Evaluation”, the difference between a 6 week process and a 7 week process is an extra 62hrs of the new members time wasted on meals, interviews, library hours, and unity days. Rather than wasting 62hrs, why not minimize the mental stress we are causing on new members and the academic stress that’s also current in our …show more content…
My goal is to shape the process in a way that promotes class bonding while maintaining their GPA, or even seeing an increase in their GPA. It is my job as Vice President of Recruitment to oversee rush week and the process, however I am truly offended that I must go to such lengths to enforce a decision I’ve made after carefully exploring all of the options. It is also truly offensive when the NMEs go behind my back and share the oncall schedules to Kat, who has no actual knowledge of the process behind the scene, for “risk management” to provide a case against my decision. So at this point and time, my decision is final and the process will be 6 weeks with no compromises. If you, as the President of this fraternity, can bring a valid argument against my decision to the table then I will be more than willing to reconsider a 7 week process, but in the meantime my decision is