In 1850 New England Gallaudet Association of the Deaf was founded, and in 1880, they had their first national convention; Robert P. McGregor was elected the first president. In 1889, the National Association of the Deaf (NAD) was adopted as the formal name of the organization. NAD went through many difficult times, but one of the first was in 1920, when deaf people were being refused the right to obtain a driving license. It wasn't until the fifteenth national convention in 1926 that concerns about the right to drive automobiles were expressed. In 1937, President Franklin D. Roosevelt pledged to Quapah rate to increase civil service opportunities for deaf workers. This was a huge step for NAD, being that it was their first real feeling of
…show more content…
In the case Robertson vs Los Animas County Sheriff’s Department, a deaf man alleged that he could not make a phone call or participate in a televised hearing that had no captioning. NAD joined that case and was able to reinstate the man’s disability discrimination claims. In the case Cuevas vs City of Hialeah, Florida, a deaf couple alleged that the police did not provide an interpreter, and committed the wife to a hospital two different times because she was deaf. The case of Mosier vs Commonwealth of Kentucky, is still pending. A deaf attorney alleged that the Kentucky state courts have a policy of not providing interpreters for deaf attorneys when the appear in court. The new and more popular case, NAD vs Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, both universities failed to provide captioning for their public, online educational videos. Another newer and popular case, NAD vs Humana Insurance and Florida Department of Financial Services, deaf people are denied video phone calls with the insurance company, and denied an interpreter for an appointment. The case of NAD vs Godinez, the Illinois Department of Corrections faces a lawsuits filed by 11 deaf prisoners with the charge of denying them communication. NAD vs Bryd Stadium and Comcast Center, pushed aside the idea of putting captioning in their stadium. NAD vs Mountain States Health Alliance, a CODA was left with no other option than to interpret for her parents when she was dying of cancer because of the hospital’s refusal to provide a qualified
In the case Robertson vs Los Animas County Sheriff’s Department, a deaf man alleged that he could not make a phone call or participate in a televised hearing that had no captioning. NAD joined that case and was able to reinstate the man’s disability discrimination claims. In the case Cuevas vs City of Hialeah, Florida, a deaf couple alleged that the police did not provide an interpreter, and committed the wife to a hospital two different times because she was deaf. The case of Mosier vs Commonwealth of Kentucky, is still pending. A deaf attorney alleged that the Kentucky state courts have a policy of not providing interpreters for deaf attorneys when the appear in court. The new and more popular case, NAD vs Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, both universities failed to provide captioning for their public, online educational videos. Another newer and popular case, NAD vs Humana Insurance and Florida Department of Financial Services, deaf people are denied video phone calls with the insurance company, and denied an interpreter for an appointment. The case of NAD vs Godinez, the Illinois Department of Corrections faces a lawsuits filed by 11 deaf prisoners with the charge of denying them communication. NAD vs Bryd Stadium and Comcast Center, pushed aside the idea of putting captioning in their stadium. NAD vs Mountain States Health Alliance, a CODA was left with no other option than to interpret for her parents when she was dying of cancer because of the hospital’s refusal to provide a qualified