Case: Nordmann V. National Hotel Company

Great Essays
Register to read the introduction… Within that case, you will find mentioned the

second case: Nordmann v. National Hotel Company, 425 F.2d. 1103 (5th Cir. 1970). That case

establishes the basis by which the court in Margreiter determined the level of duty the New Hotel

Monteleone owed to Mr. Margreiter. It may help you with the remainder of this homework.
Read both cases. Then, answer the questions below.

Here are the cases: Margreiter case Nordmann case

1. During an appeal, the appeals court is required to rely on the evidence submitted during

the trial. The "record," which is made by both parties during the trial, including all objections and

other submissions of evidence, is binding on the appeals court, unless it was erroneous or not

reasonable to believe or accept that evidence. Further, decisions of fact and credibility are typically

left to the jury to make, and appeals courts prefer not revisiting those decisions (unless they are

beyond the weight of the evidence or defy credulity.) Because the jury can weigh the body

language of the witnesses during trial, and the record on appeal can't show that, appeal
…show more content…
Make sure to set out the steps of the model and apply your reasoning

and facts to the model in your answer. (Points : 10)

Yes I agree with the decisions of both cases and that they were both ethical in nature because it was

a clear negligence in duty of the hotels to protect the guest. “Failure to perform duty” and

subsequent damages because of that were considered by the court before a verdict was reached.

From the perspective of Ethical theory concerned with duties and rights hotels had a duty to

provide reasonable security to its customers but the hotels did not provide such security. From the

perspective of substantial ethics if hotels do not provide security, incidents of robbery, rape,

assault and battery will increase. The Wall Street Journal Model – Margreiter Case The steps are -

Is it legal duties of the hotel to keep the guest safe from third party? What the impact on

shareholders is? What the impact on the employees is? What the impact on customers is?

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    After Colorado Carpet had begun installing the carpet, Mrs. Palermo was dissatisfied. Therefore, the installation of the carpet is part of the service in the contract. B. RESOLUTION: [Colorado Carpet Installation, Inc. v. Palermo, 668 P.2d 1384 (Colo. 1983)] How did the court answer the questions? What did the court decide?…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case The People of the State of Colorado v. Sandra L. Jacobson, Jacobson is convicted of homicide. The homicide resulted from her truck colliding with a taxi cab while she was driving under the influence. There were two passengers in the taxi at the time of the collision and both were killed. Jacobson appealed the court’s decision on the basis that the trial court did not allow her attorneys to gauge whether or not the jury had become biased due to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible information. On the fourth day of the trial, the Court was made aware of the fact that a local television network would be covering the incident that led to this trial on its evening news program.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The critical implications of the decision of Haque & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1765 (2 July 2015) in terms of the binding nature of opinions of Medical Officers of the Commonwealth (“MOC”) appointed by the Minister, are as it is stated in regulation 2.25A of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) the (“Regulations”). In that the opinion of the MOC is to be taken as to be correct in determining whether a person meets the requirements of Public Interest Criteria (“PIC”) 4005. The delegate of the Minister is not to form their own opinion on whether or not an applicant meets the requirements of PIC 4005.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Merritt Vs Dillard

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, “using the same legal standard as the district court.” Merritt v. Dillard Paper Co., 120 F.3d 1181, 1184 (11th Cir. 1997). To win on a motion for summary judgment, the movant only needs to show that there is no genuine dispute of material fact and that they are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ.…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malice Liability Case

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Question 1: A: True. Malice aforethought is “a planned killing motivated by spite” (Woolman, Homicide). Additionally, there is express malice. Express malice is the “defendant’s subjective intent to kill”, or more specifically their feelings or opinions (ChartaCourse). Hatred or the emotional equivalent is a person’s feelings or opinions and goes directly to subjective intent to kill.…

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tinker Vs Moines

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In December of 1965, Mary Beth Tinker, her brother John Tinker, and their friend Christopher Eckhardt, students of Des Moines public schools, decided they were going to wear black armbands to school for a period of time in protest of the Vietnam war. The school board found out about the students’ plan to protest, and decided to put a ban on the wearing of black armbands on school property. If any student came to school wearing an armband, they would be suspended. The three students decided to come to school wearing the armbands, and they were suspended. The students decided to sue the school district, through their parents, and the case ended up going all the way to the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No new evidences and witnesses can be presented on the appeal of a…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since 1973, the year abortions were made legal, there has been more than forty million abortions (“Stats Before Roe v. Wade” par.3). Roe v. Wade has brought changes to American society since it came into effect in 1973. Roe v. Wade has come a long way since before it was a case, when the case was made into a law, and even has an effect in today’s society. Roe v. Wade was able to change the way women obtained abortions before 1973.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adversary Process Trial

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When someone violates an administrative agency’s rules and regulations, they must go through the adjudication process. This process is made up of several steps than can result in an appeal or rising to a higher level of court. To start with, agencies have their own separation of power. There is a group who writes the rules, another group that prosecutes violators, and a group to decide if a rule has been broken and the penalties. This results in the adversary process trial.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Law 531 Week 3 Quiz

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Received from Bo $1,000 on account of $75,000 purchase price of Lot No. 2 at 27 Y Street. Albans, NY Closing in 4 weeks. (Signed) Sadia." (a)Would Bo be entitled to a decree of specific performance against Sadia? Explain.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many rules, laws, and morality were broken. What I would have done differently in this case is not to assume because someone fits the description and pin them as the primary suspect of a crime. We all know the quote when you assume. Additionally, I would have investigated and interviewed other hotel guests to see if they saw anything. I would have notified the parents of Brenton of his whereabouts before interrogating him.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case: Katzenbach v. Grant 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46756 *; 2005 WL 1378976 Facts: The Plaintiffs, Katzenbach and Osuna filed a lawsuit against Defendant Grant over a film and book rights. Grant owns a website called “thenightexposed” (www.thenightexposed.net). The Plaintiffs claim that Grant caused problems with negotiations with Sony Pictures and the USA Network. Plaintiff further claims that Grant sent a letter calling Osuna book a fake and made other defamatory articulations about the Plaintiffs on his website.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 1: Introduction What is evidence? Evidence is used in every case to prove or disprove an alleged fact. Evidence is used in many different forms, like using evidence in experiments to prove things in the experiments to make the experiments conducted to have a factual meaning behind them not just because the scientist said it happened they need proof. In a trial evidence is only was is introduced in a trial. There is lots of different evidence categories which include a testimony from a witness since they are under oath when they are on the stand it can be considered evidence.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. What happened in 1999? Was it a good year for the company? In 1999, Maverick lodging started reviewing the result of the balanced scorecard (BSC) system they developed in 1998.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should There Any Judgement Limitation of Testimonial in Social Media ? Social medias are computer-mediated tools that allow people or companies to create, share, or exchange information, career interests, ideas, and pictures/videos in virtual communities and networks. Social media is a wonderful channel for brands to engage with their target tribe.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics