Case: Nordmann V. National Hotel Company

Amazing Essays
Register to read the introduction… Within that case, you will find mentioned the

second case: Nordmann v. National Hotel Company, 425 F.2d. 1103 (5th Cir. 1970). That case

establishes the basis by which the court in Margreiter determined the level of duty the New Hotel

Monteleone owed to Mr. Margreiter. It may help you with the remainder of this homework.
Read both cases. Then, answer the questions below.

Here are the cases: Margreiter case Nordmann case

1. During an appeal, the appeals court is required to rely on the evidence submitted during

the trial. The "record," which is made by both parties during the trial, including all objections and

other submissions of evidence, is binding on the appeals court, unless it was erroneous or not

reasonable to believe or accept that evidence. Further, decisions of fact and credibility are typically

left to the jury to make, and appeals courts prefer not revisiting those decisions (unless they are

beyond the weight of the evidence or defy credulity.) Because the jury can weigh the body

language of the witnesses during trial, and the record on appeal can't show that, appeal
…show more content…
Make sure to set out the steps of the model and apply your reasoning

and facts to the model in your answer. (Points : 10)

Yes I agree with the decisions of both cases and that they were both ethical in nature because it was

a clear negligence in duty of the hotels to protect the guest. “Failure to perform duty” and

subsequent damages because of that were considered by the court before a verdict was reached.

From the perspective of Ethical theory concerned with duties and rights hotels had a duty to

provide reasonable security to its customers but the hotels did not provide such security. From the

perspective of substantial ethics if hotels do not provide security, incidents of robbery, rape,

assault and battery will increase. The Wall Street Journal Model – Margreiter Case The steps are -

Is it legal duties of the hotel to keep the guest safe from third party? What the impact on

shareholders is? What the impact on the employees is? What the impact on customers is?

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Main Juror Jury Functions

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just because one gives an excuse as to why they can 't attend Jury duty, it doesn 't mean that it 'll be approved. That being said, there are four principles that must be used to excuse a Juror before a capital trial goes into effect. The first principle that will excuse a juror in a capital case is if he or she does not have full knowledge as to what capital punishment is and what it consist of (Gardner and Anderson, 2010). In other words, every Juror must know what they are putting themselves into when they are obligated to attend a case that may consist of the death penalty. The second principles, on the other hand, requires Jurors to use the law properly when it comes to capital punishment, for if a Juror is telling the judge in Voir Dire that he or she will not convict the defendant if he or she is going to trial for the death penalty, they will not be allow to join the Juror pool (Gardner and Anderson, 2010).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Success Hotel Case

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    But in this case, it is the hotel’s duty to ensure safety for the customer. Following this line of authority, it can be argued in this situation that Elena being the customer of this hotel, can sue the hotel for their negligence and not having much care for the customer’s in the hotel. However as a counter argument, Elena was not supposed to act as so, she should have called for help instead of climbing out of the cubicle and attempt to help herself. But the hotel has not much Overall, the situation in this scenario, she can sue the…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therefore, substantial evidence must be provided to hold the defendant for trial. If in any case there is insufficient evidence, the judge is supposed to dismiss the charges. Preliminary hearings may be in the form of initial appearance where the defendant is informed of the charges against them. The defendant is also advised on the right to be silent since any statement that he may make might be utilized against him in the court. It may also be essential for the defendant to seek for a bail (Montemayor, 2014).…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This tool is useful because it can help the defendant petition for a summary judgment. A summary judgment is when the defendant can claim there is no merit to the case, therefore, have the case dismissed. Depositions are oral questions that are directed at the plaintiff or the defendant. Depositions are taken by a court reporter who are usually a notary public. The deponent is under oath to answer the questions truthfully.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Technological: The hotel has potential due to its vast use of information technology to streamline its operations. The company uses its IS platforms and technological based platforms to connect multinationals, hence reducing travel and at the same time attracting corporate firms to using its resources. Legal: Laws and regulations affect the operations of the hotel in that the laws governing the country tend to tighten some areas in the hotel industry. Legal elements discourage the use of tobacco and cigarettes in the hotel, while liquor is also discouraged hence driving away…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Also, there must be a legal basis for the appeal such as alleged material error in the trial, despite not because the losing party did not agree with the verdict. If the defendant was convicted through the plea bargain then the right of appealing is demolished. Any convicted offenders are able to appeal their case based on the matter of law. When there is an appeal, the court reviews the case looking at the previous proceedings in the lower courts and will not consider new evidence. The appellate courts look at the record and the written briefs filed by the defendant and the prosecutor of the appeal.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Analysis: The Jury System

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to dismiss potential jurors without the inclusion of a reason as to why. The author includes one side that favors the abolishment of peremptory challenges due to the possibility of subjecting biases. Though, the author also includes the opposing point of view, including that of a prosecuting attorney, Michael D. Barnes. Barnes believes that peremptory challenges should…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Petitioner also challenged the logic of the government’s argument that the jury instruction constituted plain error. For Petitioner, if the error was so egregious, the government should have objected at trial. Indeed, in other contexts, appellate courts applied the plain error doctrine to legal questions that were contested at the underlying trial, not in situations where there was no objection, and therefore no dispute, between the parties. In support of this argument, Petitioner analogized to the Court’s precedent in the Double Jeopardy context. Petitioner noted that the “the plainness and even egregiousness of an error in adding an extra-statutory element is of no moment for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause where an acquittal was…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In one of the judgements, Skinner even stated, “ordinarily I would have great deference for Facher,” enraging Schlichtmann. Additionally, Facher’s proposal of splitting the trial into two phases was readily adopted by Skinner with disregard towards Schlichtmann’s objection. However, the most inappropriate instance in the book was the ex parte conversation between Skinner and Facher. According to the American Bar Association, a judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties or their lawyers, making the Skinner-Facher conversation a clear, unethical violation. The importance of these violations relates to the purpose of the judge: to be the neutral fact finder of the…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They use judicial review to determine if a court case’s law or actions contradicted the constitutional. Through the review of all the facts and information in each case as well the decision of that they can tell if that case goes with the constitution or against the constitution. Some may think one case is with the constitution while another case of similar fashion is unconstitutional. That is because the justices have different minds and also have their own opinions of each case that they see. When they have decided that a case is unconstitutional then there will be steps and procedures that will get that case repealed and another decision be made about that case.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics