Case: Mediation And Arbitration: Enrica Lexie Case

Great Essays
Mediation and Arbitration: “Enrica Lexie Case” In this paper, the “Enrica Lexie Case” will be analyzed for the purposes of better understanding the process of alternate dispute and resolution. This case involves an incident between an Italian merchant vessel, which on board carried Italian Armed Forced marines, and the St Anthony an Indian Fishing boat. As a result, between these two vessels, two fishermen of the St Anthony were killed. The question continues as to which state has the claim to jurisdiction. The main goal of making use of an alternative dispute resolution between the two nations is to be able to maintain the relationship between India and Italy.
Background Facts: On February 2012, an Italian Merchant Vessel Enrica Lexie with Italian Armed Forces aboard the vessel were sailing close to Indian waters. While on their route they encountered the St Anthony, an Indian Fishing boat. The Italian Armed Forces marines were placed on board of the merchant
…show more content…
Even with the use of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. To help solve disputes of international sea law between two states the United nations has created the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. However, before being able to take the case to the International Tribunal for the Law of the sea, Italy must have first exhausted all of its possible remedies to find a solution for this case. The permanent court of arbitration helped navigate this case, in the end however, India decided to reject Italy’s offer to pay them to release the marines into Italy’s custody. (http://73lines.blogspot.com/2015/06/enrica-lexie-case.html) After India rejects this offer, the case heads to the International Tribunal for the law of the Sea to go under arbitration. The tribunal calls for both states to suspend any trials against the accused until the issue of jurisdiction is

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Judge Casas’ Ruling In APUSA Inc. v The State of California the court rules in favor of APUSA,Inc. The court finds the State of California violated the establishment clause using the Lemon Test and Agostoni test. In both instances the CCQEA explicitly violates the establishment clause by way of money being directly distributed from the government to the religious institutions, joined with a lack of specificity of how the money is to be used. The State of California would be served in adding guidelines to the law clearly dictating that grant money is not to be used for secular purpose.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I too think that having a gun on school grounds is a serious crime. In the case of United Sates v. Lopez it should have only been up to the state to punish him, but that wasn't the case. Lopez's crime should not have been punishable under the Commerce Crime and that was exactly what the ruling upheld. The Commerce Crime had nothing to do with the Gun Free School Zone Act and therefore it was unconstitutional. Great discussion.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With respect to the conflict between Adria and Betania, there are several factors of international law to consider. The introduction of zickfish by Adrian fish farmers, BigFish, in Adbeco Lake is a matter of both maritime law as well as environmental regulation. Moreover, the Betanian legislation that empowered police to capture BigFish’s president Yancey, undermines the basic principles of foreign extradition. Finally, the military precautions that Adria, Betania, and neighboring Concordia have all taken pose an immediate threat to international security. Adria has clearly committed a violation with regards to the laws of the sea, as the introduction of zickfish into Adbeco Lake has not only spread to the territorial waters of neighboring Betania and Concordia on the lake, but more importantly the Delta River…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Identification: Legal Services Corporation v. Velazquez 531 U.S. 533 (2001) Facts: Carmen Velazquez, a 56-year-old grandmother, claimed her public assistance benefits were wrongfully terminated. Her benefits were terminated for failure to participate in a job search program without a pre-termination hearing. Without the pre-termination hearing, she was not allowed to present her physical impairment as cause for her inability to work.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU is a case that demonstrates both, inequity and inequality. Several factors in reaching the decision have to be assessed in order to identify inequity and inequality. The first factor was stated in British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU (1999) that “First, the employer must show that it adopted the standard for a purpose rationally connected to the performance of the job.” (para. 5). This principle deals with equality as everyone should be judged according to the same standards.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many in the industry will agree when we say that the contracts in the construction industry have become more and more complex. Many owners will attempt to put extensive contracts in place that leave all responsibility on the contractor for the job. In response, contractors provide pages and pages of classifications, clarifications, exceptcions and alterations to terms laid out in the original contract. Over the last two decades, it has become difficult for owners and contractors. They must rely more than ever on legal maneuvering in order to minimize risks that come with the situation.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I am attaching herewith the proposed order denying the “Mother’s Motion to Enforce Mediated Agreement. I had to respectfully disagree with Ms. Granda’s wording of her proposed motion based on the fact that I never hear you using the wording she is using on this proposed order. Since the mother is not asking for a change in the order and neither am I, then I see no reason in including wording that will potentially allow Ms. Granda to continue to frivolously litigate with the only objective to intentionally interfere with my vacation time [emphasis added], which is clearly granted within the four corners of the Mediated Agreement under §14 of this agreement (attached as a courtesy is corresponding §14.)…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress Drafts George Washington The Second Continental Congress designated George Washington the leader of the army that was to besiege Boston (AP 132) “[Washington], as an aristocrat, he could be counted on by his peers to check “the excesses of the masses.” (AP 132) Bunker Hill and Hessian Hirelings…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    it lacks effectiveness due to time, cost and lack of legal recognition by 3 of the Permanent 5 members of UNSC- Russia, China and US. A Clear example is shown in the Lubanga case in 2012, which was found guilty of war crimes relating to the use of children. This case highlights the effectiveness of the ICC in protecting human rights, however the process is time consuming and needs a lot of resources to secure a conviction. Furthermore, the ICC relies on…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nils Christie Case Study

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As previously discussed, Nils Christie’s notion that conflicts are a property is agreeable, but to a certain extent. His insight of how trials should be run is defective because justice would not be blind but rather clouded with emotions. However, there should be a change implicated to get both parties more recognized in…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    27. The Plaintiff 's actions are detrimental to the Defendant 's daughter due to the fact that the Plaintiff is teaching her daughter like she has taught her son that the laws of the government can be ignored along with valid Court orders. 28. Both the Defendant’s children’s records demonstrate the detrimental harm that the Plaintiff has continuously brought to the Defendant’s children in her efforts to alienate them from their father. Additionally, as noted, the Defendant’s son who has not had visitation with him for several years now has a criminal record and has demonstrated a total disregard for the law and for law enforcement officers.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Conflicts as Property” dates nearly 40 years and the western culture of segmentation and depersonalisation and the industrialised legal systems described are applicable to 2016. Christie uses an array of personal insight and external thought to support his philosophy of lay legal systems. His shortfalls are acknowledged and his convictions are well-supported. “Conflicts as Property” eloquently illuminates the concept and its many…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Eighteenth century the Kingdom of Naples engaged a bitter dispute with its more powerful commercial partners, in order to strengthen the consistency of its maritime border as a fiscal barrier by redefining the rules of ships’ landing. The aim of the new independent monarchy was to re-examine the exemption of foreign flags by the so-called “right of visit”, that the European monarchies claimed as a result of the Ancient Spanish treaties. The quarrel was never solved through formal agreements and the rules of ships’ landing remained fluid and undefined because of the legal pluralism which dominated the realm of trade and customs. While the conflict resolution was negotiated according to circumstances, smuggling was considered…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Assignment Choice #1: Case Analysis (1992) Electromation, Inc. v. NLRB Main Issues of The Case Electromation formed committees that they believed were employee participation programs that would mealy provide feedback to management regarding their recognition planning. A union was established after the committees where formed and after asking the company to disband them some committees still submitted proposals and continued their work. The main issue of the case was that the union didn’t agree that these committees were participation programs and they didn’t like the company directing and involving themselves in committees that discussed pay and other employment conditions. They felt that the committees constituted labor organizations…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the Court finds that it does not have jurisdiction it must dismiss the case. 2. The court requires not, in any case, acknowledge as genuine statements that negate matters appropriately subject to legal notice or by display. Nor is the court required to acknowledge as genuine statements that are only conclusory, outlandish reasoning’s of truth, or nonsensical derivations. As in “Sprewell v. Brilliant State Warriors, 266 F.3d 979, 988 (ninth Cir. 2001) (references excluded).…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays