Case: Injun Joe Is Guilty

Decent Essays
Ilijah Carballosa and Prince Erebholo
ELA 8 Jr. Scholars
Mrs. Ornelas
Per. 3
Closing Statement
Good morning ladies and gentlemen of the jury, today we are here to discuss the murder of Doc Robinson and to prove that our client Muff Potter is not guilty. All the evidence supports that Injun Joe is guilty of first degree murder, police evasion, and attempted murder. Injun Joe should receive the death penalty and pay a hefty fine for these criminal charges and for causing my client Muff Potter emotional trauma while incarcerated. The evidence provided today in court clearly suggest that Injun Joe is the murderer. We have example one, Tom Sawyer testified against Injun Joe and said he witnessed Injun Joe murder Doc Robinson In the graveyard.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ireland V Brady Summary

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) Facts of the Case: John Leo Brady was arrested, tried and found guilty in a Maryland court for murder. The other man Donald Boblit had a separate trial. During Brady’s trial, he testified that even though he was involved with the robbery that Boblit was the one who committed the murder not him. The lawyer for Brady asked the prosecution to see all Boblit’s statements to get ready for trial but the prosecution withheld one statement in which Boblit admitted to committing the murder. Brady was found guilty by a jury of murder and was given a death sentence.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction In this paper, I will discuss the key facts, issues, and court holdings of the Fare v. Michael C. case. Discussion The Fare v. Michael C. case was heard before the United States Supreme Court in 1979, following an appeal referencing the Miranda Warnings issued to the juvenile defendant (Elrod & Ryder, 2014). At the time of the arrest in February 1976 in Van Nuys, California, the suspect, Michael C., was just over sixteen years old (FindLaw, n.d.)…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wally Brogue Array

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hello your honor, members of the jury. I am Marim Ibrahim and I will be representing the accused, in the case of Her Majesty the Queen against Wally Brogue. My defendant has been accused of committing first degree murder in the death of Mr. David Bennings on July 14th 2013. This is the case of a caring, optimistic man who simply wanted to do the right thing. Mr.Brogue did not commit this crime.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Closing Argument Peoples of the court, opposing counsel, your honor we are in court today because of the criminal negligence of the defendant, Gene Forrester which led to the involuntary manslaughter of the victim Phineas or Finny known by friends. Today the Prosecution has shown without a reasonable doubt that Gene Forrester is guilty of involuntary manslaughter. Involuntary manslaughter refers to the unintentional killing that results from recklessness or criminal negligence. Criminal negligence occurs when the defendant should have been aware of the risk at hand and in Gene’s case the risk was evident. Gene stated that “ It was impossible to walk out on it far enough to be well over the river.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Steve Harmon's Trial

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, after bearing in mind all the testimonies; I have concluded on the fate of Steve Harmon. I personally find Mr. Harmon guilty of obstruction of justice and aiding and abetting, lying under oath (perjury), and accessory to robbery. Let me explain why Mr. Harmon is guilty of these crimes; first off let’s start with obstruction of justice and aiding and abetting and accessory to robbery. In page 150 King and Mr. Harmon were discussing where King stated “Yeah. All we need is a lookout.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ladies and gentlemen of the jury we are here today to reopen the case of JT Mcdaniel and the murderer of jerry a precious old man. This man had never done anything wrong in his life before and h had never yelled at anyone. Then my defendant had a rage come upon him when it did he did not know how to handle it. When my defendant felt this rage he dealt with it in the only way that he could think of and that was to kill the innocent man. When you review my defendants case you will see that the punishment that he was given was curl because he was an insane man and he did not know what he was doing at the time of the murderer.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grendel: Guilty or Innocent? “Murderers, in general, are people who are consistent, people who are obsessed with one idea and nothing else” -Ugo Betti Ladies and gentlemen of the jury. Good Morning. My job, today, is to come before you and prove to you that the accused, Grendel, is guilty of crimes of monstrosity, for which the penalty is death.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tom Robinson is guilty. While working on the farm, I keep thinking about that trial. There could be a possibility that he isn’t guilty. I don’t know. Just because a Negro is accused…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By this testimony, one believes that this might be the main reason Mayella has decided to convict Tom Robinson, in order…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    he said he said situation. And he only mentions the crime to another person far after it is committed. The material evidence is no more convincing. The minuscule material evidence in the case of the crown vs Tshuanahusset is found under dubious circumstances, and is not particularly convincing. An axe stolen from William Robinsons home is a key piece of evidence.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose brings us back in time to 1957, to a jury room of a New York Court of Law where one man, Juror #8, confronts the rest of the jury to look at a homicide case without prejudice, and ultimately convinces Juror #2, a very soft-spoken man who at first had little say in the deliberation. Throughout the play, several jurors give convincing arguments that make one think about whether the boy is “guilty” or “not guilty.” Ultimately, one is convinced by ethos, logos, and pathos. We can see ethos, logos, and pathos having an effect on Juror #2 as he begins as a humble man and changes into someone brave at the end. Although all three modes play a part in convincing Juror #2, pathos is the most influential because…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Tom Robinson’s trial has many moments where…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The O.J. Simpson trial is one of the most infamous trials in this country’s history. The jury’s decision of the trial completely shocked the people of the United States and across the world. People were glued to their televisions as the trial carried on. The verdict of the O.J. Simpson trial was wronged by many factors. Starting with the race of the suspect, to the selection of the jury, concluding with the prosecution’s failure to collect all of the substantial information and evidence to prove the guilty verdict of O.J. Simpson.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The O.J. Simpson Trial: How the Media and Race Influenced the Decision The legal decision of The People versus O.J. Simpson forever changed legal proceedings in our country, and is regarded as one of the most controversial court rulings in American history. The murder trial was unique due to the high profile status of the people involved, the circumstances surrounding the crime, and the media attention that the case received from the media. The crime occurred in 1994 Los Angeles, a racially charged area of the country still feeling the wounds of the Rodney King incident. Due to the conditions of the crime, as well as the personal history of many of the officials involved, a lot of the American public felt that O.J. Simpson was an African-American…

    • 2073 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Not long after the police left Muff shows up to the crime scene later and is arrested. Muff Potter pleads his innocence, but Injun Joe tells the police twice as an eyewitness and says that Muff Potter killed Dr. Robinson, and that he didn't have anything…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays