The ethical problem in the case against Ledbetter vs. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company is that the company unfairly paid Lilly Ledbetter while working there for 19 years due to her gender. Unfortunately, women have had a hard time gaining respect. They only wanted to be treated fairly and received the same pay as others. In some cases, it states that women will not be able to get paid equally regardless if it is for the same job function. This unequal pay still exists because of the discrimination of gender gap. Subsequently, throughout her employment with the company, her exposure to information led her to believe that she was being paid unfairly in comparison to her fellow male employees. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company knowingly allowed
…show more content…
Companies such as Goodyear Tire and Rubber should pay women equally as long as they have the same qualifications. While it is clear that gender equal pay is an ethical concern today for women that have similar job skills as men. Furthermore, the utilitarian theory will be utilized to substantiate the moral argument. Utilitarianism is an influential theory when reviewing Ledbetter's case and about the discrimination of unfair pay. While using the Utilitarianism theory, a utilitarian could dispute that women who qualify for the same job function with equivalent experience or education should be paid either equally or fairly. The consequence would not only help women with the same employment opportunities; it would benefit society and create a cause for the greater good of everyone. Mill’s believes if these values lead to reflection of the given utility it will result to maximizing pleasure, and if the consequences are the same, then equality should then be warranted (p. 22). Nonetheless, a practical utilitarian would consider the triumphs that will produce a result that would be satisfactory for all parties involved. Thus, suggesting that companies should not pay women differently as well as discriminate because it would be ethically wrong based on moral values of being right or wrong for the greater
Companies such as Goodyear Tire and Rubber should pay women equally as long as they have the same qualifications. While it is clear that gender equal pay is an ethical concern today for women that have similar job skills as men. Furthermore, the utilitarian theory will be utilized to substantiate the moral argument. Utilitarianism is an influential theory when reviewing Ledbetter's case and about the discrimination of unfair pay. While using the Utilitarianism theory, a utilitarian could dispute that women who qualify for the same job function with equivalent experience or education should be paid either equally or fairly. The consequence would not only help women with the same employment opportunities; it would benefit society and create a cause for the greater good of everyone. Mill’s believes if these values lead to reflection of the given utility it will result to maximizing pleasure, and if the consequences are the same, then equality should then be warranted (p. 22). Nonetheless, a practical utilitarian would consider the triumphs that will produce a result that would be satisfactory for all parties involved. Thus, suggesting that companies should not pay women differently as well as discriminate because it would be ethically wrong based on moral values of being right or wrong for the greater