Cartels: Class, Status, And Party

Improved Essays
INTRODUCTION
According to Karl Marx, (1818-1883) capitalists make and enforce laws that serve their interests and act against the interest of workers; their control over all institution enables them to create common beliefs that make workers accept their status. These economic, political and religious ideologies make the masses loyal to the very institution that is the source of their exploitation. Max Weber(1864-1920) on the other hand attempted to clarify, criticize and modify the works of Marx. Weber also analyzed three dimensions of stratification which are class, status, and party. This article shows the scientific comparison of these theorists and incorporating their theories to the current issues to show the functionalist and the conflict
…show more content…
Cartels are an organization created by a group of producers to regulate supply in an effort to control or manipulate prices without competition. The article stated that The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is the world's largest cartel; it consists of 14 oil-producing countries. Their mission is to coordinate and unify the petroleum policies of its members to ensure stabilization. Although proving the existence of a cartel is rarely easy The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has made the detection and prosecution of cartels one of its priority policy objectives. It has identified four major categories that define their strategies which are: price fixing, output restrictions, market allocation and bid rigging. One famed economist Adam Smith states, "People of the same trade seldom meet for merriment and diversion but the conversation ends in a conspiracy to raise …show more content…
The bourgeoisie is the capitalist, the wealthy who owns the means of production whereas the proletariat are the ones who make up the workers and they are the ones being exploited.Social stratification developed by well- known sociologist Max Weber is viewed as the uneven distribution of privileges, material rewards, opportunities, power, prestige and wealth among individuals and groups. In today's society, one needs to distinguish between legitimate cooperations and illegitimate collusion, it is difficult to state when a cartel is a "cartel." Cartels do not abolish competition and innovation but reshape the rules of the game. There are different categories of cartels however the article focuses on the Export Cartels which shows how business work together to dominate or monopolize the importing market in today's society through the power which refers to the degree individuals or groups can impose their will onto others. Laissez-Faire Capitalism also manipulates the means of production in their favor as long as they are able to maximize their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The value of this website is of my interest because their facts are so interesting and they also have all their interviews on their and all the details of what cartels have done. I have found an article based on the cartels of Mexico and why they kill mayors. This links up with how the cartels are involved with politics and how their power is rising through this. Another thing is how it relates to all the murders these cartels are doing and also how they are terrorising their own country and are making their country worse than it already is at the moment. This supports my search on cartels because it show how their power is rising.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This German philosopher was in the midst of many revolutions throughout his time. At one point, he was known as the spokesman of the ‘Communist Party’ in 1848, which signifies the kind of involvement he was intervened within at the time. Although Marx was a member of a wealthy family in which he utilized to acquire good education, he was a philosopher who critiqued capitalism. Marx attacks the bourgeoisie families and individuals who happened to be property owners or factory occupants, and critiqued these families and individuals because he believed as property owners; they would need to hire people in order to operate the property. His idea of discarding the middle class was revealed in the third idea of his book The Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Power Elite Analysis

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this paper, I will discuss and examine “Some Principles of Stratification” by Davis and Moore, “The Power Elite” by Mills, and “Who Rules America” by Domhoff. Davis and Moore argue that there are two ways in which society falls into social structures. The first being there must be a motivation or desire for certain occupations. The second is that these jobs must offer rewards to keep people in these positions for a long time. Next, Mills argues that power is determined by the world we live in.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carlyle Vs. Marx

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Workers in a capitalistic society are destined to ultimately be destroyed and no longer viewed as a human with equal rights under God’s law (Marx, p. 23-24, 1844). Then and now people are reduced to being seen only as a tool that goes to the repair shop (Cortes, 9 Sept., 2016). The idea that the rich owe nothing more to the poor but the agreed upon wages, no more and no less just like paying for a calculator (Carlyle, p.146-147, 1843). That even their impending death does not entitle them to some kind of help beyond a contract (Carlyle p. 150, 1843).…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I address how Karl Marx in The Critique of Capitalism and Louis Althusser in the Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses demonstrate that institutional forces within capitalist societies have upheld the power dynamics central to capitalism, and the main driving force that allows this upholding to persist is reproduction. Marx explains that in order for capitalism to continue the reproduction of the character of the worker and reproduction of worker needs to exist. The feudal system, in Marx’ eyes, persisted only when feudalism was widely accepted and endorsed by society. For capitalism it is the same. Capitalism is in the very fabric of society which is why the reproduction of the character of the worker has persisted.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto is the first document with systematic and complete presentation of all components of the great teachings of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels. It formulates the basic provisions of the materialist understanding of history, the objective laws of development of society, regularities of transition from one mode of production to another. It also describes the history of all existing class societies as the history of class struggles. Both the role and evolution of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat under capitalism are discussed in this book. Overcoming crises by destroying huge amounts of wealth, by a fierce competitive struggle for the conquest of new markets, the bourgeoisie creates a stronger, a more devastating crises.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx thinks ideology as a system of beliefs, presupposition and sentiments which serve the benefits of the creators of the system. With the economic power in hand, the ruling class can shape the social discourses and inject its ideology into the general public. By discussing the historical transitions of ruling classes and their ideologies, Marx argues there is no natural ideology. Therefore the capitalists’ argument that certain behaviors or beliefs under capitalism are natural is implausible. Also, as his analysis shows that capitalism only serves the benefits of capitalists at the expenses of the majority of the population, it is obvious that the capitalistic ideology cannot be beneficial to the majority of the society however the capitalists propagate.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, social classes have developed. Milanovic offers an historical evidence that the social classes are split into workers, capitalists, and landlords in the 19th century under a capitalist country. These classes play an important role in determining the future of the society. In an economy, the rich provide the feeding and the poor saves investment in order to keep a healthy economy running. He, then, reasons that there is good and bad inequality.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx sought to abolish the belief system that preserved the uneven distribution of wealth and prolonged the suffering of the proletariat. As a result of the industrial revolution, the upper class exercised its power over the lower classes exclusively for the purpose of protecting self-interest. The labor of the lower classes not only supported their subsistence, but upheld the luxurious existence of the bourgeoisie as well. While the bourgeoisie retained control of the means of production, they entered an agreement with the proletariat to form “the rights of man,” which preserve the rights to life, liberty, and security with the limitation that one man’s rights should not undermine the rights of another. In his effort to outline the implications of “the rights of man,” Karl Marx presents a clear argument that the rights to life, liberty, and security ultimately preserve self-interest and detach man from civil society.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Drug Cartel Problem

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “the country must be protected from the cartels, insurgents, or suicide bomber lurking on the other side. ”(Norris) Our economy is failing, our drug problem is almost unstoppable, terrorists are entering. There are numerous problems that America is facing night now, but they can be fixed. By building a wall on our border with mexico would help our economy, keep out drugs and provide a defence from terrorists.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1.5 stratification (15 points) (1) Weber’s conception of stratification is derived from his analysis of economic activities in relationships. He said that economic relationships are decided by individuals’ chance of using their material property for exchange on the market. Thus, people sharing similar material conditions are classified into groups. In Weber’s view, the inequality between different groups is associated with not only the economic dimension but also social, political, and ideological dimensions. And such inequality linked with the social structure forms social order and ties people.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Paper- Marx vs. Weber Sociologist, Karl Marx and Max Weber, have spent their sociological careers researching and developing theories of how to make a good society. Both Marx and Weber, go about answering this question slightly different. Karl Marx believes there can be no such thing as a good society as long as history lasts, while Max Weber on the other hand believes in a good society, only when the society and its individuals are free. Max Weber is a sociologist associated with the German tradition of sociology. To answer the question of if it is possible to make a good society, Weber would respond with yes, it is possible to create a good society, however a good society is only formed when the society is free (Lecture 11/01/16).…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Once a political force that could strain the U.S. economy at will, the organization is now left exposed to free market conditions in a way never before seen. While still influential, the golden age of OPEC has long since passed. As oil production in non-OPEC countries increases, as renewable energy sources continue to be adopted, and as the twelve member states remain divisive, the organization’s power will continue to wane until there is no further need for its existence. As game theory has proven, cartels are inherently unstable and prone to failure, revealing that OPEC’s ignoble end is not only predictable, but a forgone…

    • 1276 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays