Stakeholder1: Positions2 Interests3 BATNA – their best alternative to a negotiated agreement (negotiating power)4 Creative alternatives and possible win/win solutions5
Residents(support)
This project should be approved.
The planned area does not cover valuable areas for food production, which is a major concern for many stakeholders, and the mining will be a good business because of its good access. a future long term employer for children in the area
the provider of valuable export income through mining
repair NSW's damaged reputation in the international investment community Attract any business by that will not have damage our land or local business, by, for example, some subsidies or tax reduction.
Farmland holders (against) Be …show more content…
The project will risk to the agricultural future of the Namoi Valley which is famous for the fertile farmlands. More detailed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that shows this project will not damage these below.
water and air quality
Air quality
Ecology /Biodiversity
Archaeology and Cultural Heritage(including Aboriginal heritage)
Geochemical environment Cancelling the project, postponing it until enough data is achieved, or making it smaller scale so that every details that this community raised should be assessed clearly and proved to be less concern.
Gunnedah Local Government ( the planned site)
If the issues that we are concerned are all addressed, we will support this project. The development should fit the objectives of Ecological Sustainable Development and the Precautionary Principle. Details about the scope, extent and funding of road closures, realignments and upgrading works;
Whether the funds is provided by the proponent
environmental …show more content…
Profit (1 billion turnover/yes x over 30 years)
Approval from each stakeholder
Legislation
Environmental, social, ecological, effect
Risk management
coal mining and rural industries’ co-existence
The reputation of being responsible, environmental and community conscious
Safety for their employees
The NSW Department of Planning and Environment(DPE) Take time to plan and make decision regarding this project by taking every interests into considerations. The Independent Expert Scientific Committee is also included. Stakeholders’ interest
Possible effect of this project uncertainty Media reputation, pressure
Fair decision-making
Budgets
Who to believe and prioritize
Legislation
Scientific evidence Take over the responsibility as a decision-maker to another or other sectors.
Ask for other smart and intelligent decision makers over the world with some
Residents(support)
This project should be approved.
The planned area does not cover valuable areas for food production, which is a major concern for many stakeholders, and the mining will be a good business because of its good access. a future long term employer for children in the area
the provider of valuable export income through mining
repair NSW's damaged reputation in the international investment community Attract any business by that will not have damage our land or local business, by, for example, some subsidies or tax reduction.
Farmland holders (against) Be …show more content…
The project will risk to the agricultural future of the Namoi Valley which is famous for the fertile farmlands. More detailed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that shows this project will not damage these below.
water and air quality
Air quality
Ecology /Biodiversity
Archaeology and Cultural Heritage(including Aboriginal heritage)
Geochemical environment Cancelling the project, postponing it until enough data is achieved, or making it smaller scale so that every details that this community raised should be assessed clearly and proved to be less concern.
Gunnedah Local Government ( the planned site)
If the issues that we are concerned are all addressed, we will support this project. The development should fit the objectives of Ecological Sustainable Development and the Precautionary Principle. Details about the scope, extent and funding of road closures, realignments and upgrading works;
Whether the funds is provided by the proponent
environmental …show more content…
Profit (1 billion turnover/yes x over 30 years)
Approval from each stakeholder
Legislation
Environmental, social, ecological, effect
Risk management
coal mining and rural industries’ co-existence
The reputation of being responsible, environmental and community conscious
Safety for their employees
The NSW Department of Planning and Environment(DPE) Take time to plan and make decision regarding this project by taking every interests into considerations. The Independent Expert Scientific Committee is also included. Stakeholders’ interest
Possible effect of this project uncertainty Media reputation, pressure
Fair decision-making
Budgets
Who to believe and prioritize
Legislation
Scientific evidence Take over the responsibility as a decision-maker to another or other sectors.
Ask for other smart and intelligent decision makers over the world with some