Comparison Of Capitalism And Socialism

Improved Essays
Around the world today there are different kinds of economic models, two of them being capitalism and socialism. Capitalism can be seen in places such as Singapore and Hong Kong and socialism can be seen in places such as Venezuela and Bolivia. These economic models can be seen as ones that are on opposite sides of the spectrum from each other. They each have their own stand on government control, private property, and regulations and numerous other topics. Therefore, capitalism and socialism are two vastly different economic models creating components in each that are positive and negative.

Capitalism has its benefits and downfalls as an economic model. What distinguishes capitalism from any other economic model is the lack of any government
…show more content…
A significant difference from capitalism is, socialism has a great deal of involvement from the government in its economic system. The positive of that being that with the government involvement is the stability that comes along with the government in business. The government owns many of the factories, which is also another benefit for the consumers, because unlike the predictability of the market the government is less likely to crash. The downfall of this being that it does not allow for much private property for citizens; therefore, it limits the options for business to mainly what the government owns. Leonard Reed was an economist against socialism because he believed “the absence of governmental or any other coercive master-minding—then one will possess an absolutely essential ingredient for freedom: a faith in free people” as said in his piece I, Pencil. The negative aspect of socialism that Reed is addressing is the hindrance of individual’s freedoms. On the other hand, a positive aspect of socialism is the equality it creates for the people in the society. Overall my thoughts on socialism are, that this economic system will not flourish as well as a capitalistic due to the regulations imposed on by the government but it will have greater stability because a majority of the economic power is in the government. As a whole, socialism can be viewed positively or negatively due to its different …show more content…
While they may seem to be polar opposites with no similarities, they do in fact have similarities, for instance, fluctuation occurs in both with their quantity and price of products. But they differ in exactly who is in charge, for capitalism it is the market but for socialism it is the government. Nonetheless, a majority between these two models is very different. The beauty of them both is that each us functional in certain countries around the world. Through their positives and negatives these economic models still stand

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Socialism Vs Capitalism

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism propose a system based on the management of the resources by individuals with the right to privatized them and make profit of them, which conduces most of the times to a corrupt and immoral system with governments at the service of a few wealthy groups. This opens a wide gap between their people resulting in social unrest. On the other side, is the socialist system, based in the control and distribution of the resources by the government. And while some people may argue that this system is almost utopian because it also depends on the people who is in power, at least this system in its essence, propose a fair distribution of wealth among their people, resulting in the creation of a society with equality between its…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My revision is to elaborate on the economic system portion of my review and to add additional information. In this week's assignment, I selected to address the Ledbetter vs. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company case, where Lilly Ledbetter filed discrimination for gender pay. Capitalism and socialism both serve as a crucial part of the economic system for this setting. Some of the characteristics of capitalism are better working conditions, better wages, the profit motive, competition, and greed. In reference to the socialist theory which is practically the opposite and is not motivated by personal self-interest.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I personally feel that capitalism is what abuses bad decisions such as gambling and attempting to win off what others bet or risk, whereas socialism would have a systematic approach of preventing bad decisions and enhance them. Thus, the United Sates is not in a condition to adopt socialist ideas to its entirety but rather over time, there could be a democratic socialism which would adopt the positive aspects of both a democracy and socialist society while possibly eliminating harmful traits of oligarchies and capitalist societies. Therefore, would have to choose his third form of equality of opportunity which is the socialist equality of opportunity over first two…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Socialism failed because it couldn’t tell the economic truth; capitalism may fail because it couldn’t tell the ecological truth”1 In a perfect world where equality is in our everyday lives and respected without criticism, socialism is the ideal economy. However, we do not live in a perfect world, so the United States has combined reality and fantasy into one and constructed an economy with the influence of both capitalism and socialism. Socialism is a considerably decent economy on the basis that the means of production are socially owned and used to meet human needs and not create profit, however profit serves as a guide to the most highly valued means. A socialist economy is a bad economy because every country who has used this economic system has failed, or is failing, because they are unable, or were unable, to use “pure” socialism. On the analysis of whether or not socialism is a good economy, one must recognize both sides of this debate.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Capitalism: The Quest for Cost Reduction and a Fair Price Capitalism is the idea that wealth can be grown. Under a capitalistic society, wealth is grown from the private sector where land is privately owned. Production in a capitalistic society is efficient due to the rewards of being efficient. If a producer can make more goods for cheaper than he currently is then the producer can make more money. Capitalism arose out of specific conditions during the feudal era in England and was widely put to use in various countries during the Industrial Revolution.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socialism In America

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the capitalist society of The United States of America the economy is faced with many problems that come along with a society that relies on destroying the competition in order to gain a profit and be successful. This competition can raise problems such as Corporations that control the manufacturing and prices of one product or service. Capitalist Governments have little to no control over how big they can get, and try to regulate this through many laws. However these regulations don‘t always work, and allow corporations to take advantage of loops holes which allows corporations to have to pay less taxes. This problem is not prevalent in Socialist systems of government because of heavier regulations in order to protect the people and not…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capitalism is greatly beneficial because of its positive aspects such as; allowing the prices of goods to be set by the market, establishing competition between producers, and giving producers the freedom to manufacture what the market desires. Capitalism has been tried and found successful many times, but socialism has been found wanting time and time…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate of these two economic systems defines and interprets them, changes them historically, and provides proof of different rights given to the people of the governments that implement them. Socialism is a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole. This means that there is no…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is also important for other competitors in this process. In a socialist system, people don’t need to compete for their development because everything belongs to the community; instead of this they compete for political power, which causes much instability in socialist countries. This harms the development of the countries, and it also helps explain why many capitalist countries are secure, such as the United States and Canada. On the other hand, socialism may be viewed as superior to capitalism because it seeks for social justice and promotes education. Socialism, a general term for the political and economic theory, advocates a system of collective or government ownership and management of the means of production and distribution of goods.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    ‘Socialism’ is a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. The ultimate aim of a socialist state is the formation of a communist society. The primary difference between socialism and communism is that the former is a dictatorship of the ‘proletariat’ while the latter is a classless society. Hence, there is a state, a political party and a controlled economy in a socialist state whereas a communist state is one where the state completely ‘withers away’ and a classless society is…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today in our modern era there are different types of philosophies/economic systems that is used throughout the different countries such as capitalism, communism and socialism. Socialism is a type of economic and political system/theory. The basic principle of socialism centers on common ownership, this basically means that the entire population of the earth share ownership of the resources available. The main goal of socialism is to achieve equality between the members of the society, it focuses primarily on resources and the economy. The definition of common ownership does not pertain to personal possessions, it simply means that the people have the right to give their opinions and participate in the different decisions pertaining to the shared global resources that are not personally owned.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently, the world is profoundly segregated on the issue of economic systems. Divided on the issue, people are supporting capitalism, socialism or a mix of both. In fact, there are no pure capitalist or socialist systems. Pure capitalism, the existence of free market, is the perfect system for the prosperity of individuals, communities and the nation as a whole. People who work so hard do not have the responsibility to pay others bills.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capitalism and socialism in the 19th century have similarities and differences such as goals of the economic systems, views of human nature, and the purpose of government. Each economic system have their own goals for what their ideal society should be. Capitalism has a goal of individual success. Socialism wants there to be a group success.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socialism is a capitalist base with a communist control, meaning that individuals may own a company, but the government has more control over the regulations that the business has to follow to provide a more even distribution of goods and wealth to everyone. This extreme government control is good because everyone gets a piece of the luxuries, but it is bad because it starts to eliminate people’s drive to become more successful. The increased regulation may also make it more difficult for smaller family-owned businesses to thrive. This government control causes people to not want to strive as hard to do anything because they are being handed everything, opposite of what drives a capitalistic economy. This is also stated in Michael Howard’s article Basic income, liberal neutrality, socialism, and work, “More appropriate for socialism is distribution . . . .…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Communism

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the big reasons capitalism aids the government is because people are given chances to run businesses or contribute to them at will. This gives the government chances to tax the businesses income, while the rest goes to the business owners, who eventually spend that money, and a steady flow of money from people to businesses to government is established. In communism however, the businesses are all government owned, and although the government is making all the profit, they must flush that income back to the people so that they will spend the money at the government businesses. In this system, the people are making no income, and the government is having to give money for the people to spend into the economy, instead of the government making profit, and the people making profit of their…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays