Socialism In Upton Sinclair's 'The Jungle'

Good Essays
In the book The Jungle we are trying to figure out whether Sinclair is for socialism. And we are also trying to figure out a socialism government would have helped Jurgis. Jurgis struggled with many things in this book. So let us tell you what. Most socialists talk about a need for private ownership and only advocate the need for state owning the important parts. Sinclair wanted a socialist government because everyone had equal opportunity. Although most readers did not realize it, his beliefs actually embraced the American dream. He felt like American capitalism would get in the way of our freedom that our founding fathers fought for. Sinclair based his argument against capitalism on his belief that capitalism violated essential …show more content…
Sinclair based his attack on capitalism on his belief that capitalism violated essential American values. Sinclair believed that socialism was the means for American liberals to achieve most fully the ideals they embraced. Sinclair abhorred the exploitation of the working class and economic inequality. He thought that America should be the land of opportunity for all people, provided they were willing to work. He thought that America should be the land of opportunity for all people, provided they were willing to work. Sinclair's form of socialism dominated his writings as he attempted to provide a logical argument for what was, to him, a very personal and emotional issue. For Sinclair, the ideals of America stressed equality and brotherhood, but in all actuality, the rich did indeed get richer and the poor got poorer. No equality. No brotherhood. But just as The Jungle was seen as an attack on the meatpacking industry, Sinclair's perceived views on capitalism and socialism endured more so than his actual message. Too many people are unable to separate a political system from an economic system. Moreover, the United States, unlike many European counterparts, never had an overwhelmingly successful socialist movement, so Sinclair is remembered as a muckraker, not a socialist. The worsening conditions of the proletariat, or working class, during the close of the nineteenth century led to the modern socialist movement. When the predicted violent revolution did not occur, many socialists began to reject the need for violence as a means for achieving their goals. Sinclair's goal was to attain what he referred to as "democratic socialism" in the United States. Although most readers did not realize it, his beliefs actually embraced the American dream.In the book The Jungle we

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Marx is a socialist political theorist who brought revolutionary change and Locke is a liberal political philosopher. Marx critiques Locke's liberal theories such as the state of nature, private property, labor, money, and slavery. In Locke's state of nature, all men had natural rights to be equal and free without anyone placing harm on his life, liberty, and property. Marx believed that liberalism instead of providing equality among citizens it was promoting inequality. When Marx critiques Locke's liberalist theories he proves some contradictions that Locke was against.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He bases most of his argument as anti-socialist, as he believes that men may grow stronger as they work hard and achieve only what they deserve. He views socialism as the tool of plundered laws to make its subjects docile so that they may be taken advantage of. It is not until the end of his essay that he compares socialism with communism using flawed logic, which further invalidates his argument. Now, if he were to see the modern U.S. government, he would label it as a socialist one due to its resemblance with current government help. Unfortunately, he uses the fallacy known the slippery slope in hope to validate his argument that “this is the high road to communism” (51), which is the conclusion of the slippery slope.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Individualism In America

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Here we see Abner, who is used of as a generalization of the American worker, believing what their employers is saying about socialism without question. For Sinclair this explains why socialism is not view favorable in the eyes of the workers, the monopoly that the employers have on the minds of the workers have ensured that socialism did not cement itself in…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Also, due to complete communism, Marxism believes “Political power, properly so called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another” (388). Although this perceptions’ intent is to improve human life with equality, it ultimately complicates the economy and life in his era. The demolishment of political power raises countless unresolved issues in society. Nowhere in Condorcet’s program does he remotely intend to create complications, but only to maximize human potential. Another major difference between these two men that define which theory is more likely to be successful is Condorcet’s realization that we cannot completely do away with inequality.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Much like liberal democracy, Marx believed that individual rights were harmful to the proletariat because they favored the landowning bourgeoisie over the proletariat. When individuals can’t be separated from society and class structure, it gives those with a higher place in the structure more opportunities to improve their rights and the right to fight for their liberties. Equal rights, to Marx and Marxists were never equal, because people, in capitalism weren’t treated equally or given equal protection.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capitalism In America

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Does our capitalistic culture serve the needs of the many, or of the few? Capitalism was a tearing away from the feudalistic society in Europe, and it introduced the middle/working-class besides having just the two structures of the rich and the poor. It offered the opportunity for one to better one 's station through hard-work, perseverance, and ingenuity. Do we see a progressive society that attempts to apply the ideal set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, or one that fails in this regard? The United States was set upon the principle of the belief that anyone could come here and find equality and an opportunity to make something of his or her life.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx criticized capitalism during the Industrial Revolution because the social injustice that arose, continuing from the Middle Ages, where the bourgeoisie dominated the economy while the working class suffered tremendously. Believing that capitalism was a flawed system as it led to class conflicts, Marx believed in communism was the ideal system to benefit all individuals equally. By overthrowing the wealthy and seizing their private property, those who work hard in society will surely gain. Carnegie, however, was not a communist. Instead he believed in the idea of “administration of wealth,” that the wealthy individuals had a responsibility to distribute their wealth throughout their lifetime to the community such as donations and charities.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socialists reject that idea and instead want the adoption of socialism to come through peace and agreement. While socialists may not agree with our capitalist economic system they do support the democratic values of the constitution of the United States of America One of the most essential ideas of socialism is everyone is equal in terms of economics. Socialists say that capitalism has succeded in making the country wealthy but has continually failed in one area, and that area is…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Whilst Liberals argue for an attempt to achieve a state that grants us the most freedom, Marxists argue that the state itself is the problem and that humanity will at some point, grow tired of its oppressor, and revolt to defeat the state, leaving the survivors better for it. (Mellor, 2015). Marxists believe that all private property should be confiscated by the state, because it is said that privately held property should really belong to the State. For example, US Liberals say that part of the obligation of being a citizen of The United States of America, is to be willing to let the government use some of your salary in order to create a stable, social structure. Creating a stable social structure includes various actions.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Parker et al. (2007) similarly defined socialism as the belief that the resources and production of a society should benefit the common good vice a select few individuals (p 237). Parker et al, posited that both communism and socialism have the common goals of reorganizing society using the guiding principle collectively controlling resources for a common good rather than being controlled by a select few(2007). Additionally, they observed that both seek to abolish private property and have everything owned by the community as whole. Parker et al pointed out that while both communism and socialism share similarities, such as collective control over resources, they also share several important differences.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays