Capital Punishment 's Reputation Of Being Unfair Essay

1480 Words Dec 9th, 2014 6 Pages
Throughout America 's history, the death sentence, known as capital punishment, has induced a sizable bulk of controversy in the judicial system. Capital punishment’s reputation of being unfair has provoked debates about the practicality of death as an effective deterrent to murder. Since its reinstatement in 1977, capital punishment’s trials have been fair regarding race, but unfair to male and economically disadvantaged offenders. Rather than re-abolishing an effective deterrent to murder, steps should be taken to improve the fairness of the trial process.

Public opinion on the death penalty has constantly changed due to negligent judges, biased courts, and sheer lack of evidence for sentencing. The first time the practicality of capital punishment’s deterrence was put into question occurred in the 1840s. During the time, the death penalty could be given by any local judge and an offender could be executed in public the very next day. The simple lack of due process made the death sentence unfair. In 1846, Michigan banned the death penalty. This made Michigan the first place to ever abolish the execution of those judged guilty. In 1963, the death penalty was banned throughout America because it was ruled as an improper deterrent to capital offenses. The chance of an innocent person dying because of unfair trials made capital punishment seem arbitrary and defective. With a more fair court system, death would be the best sentence for one facing capital punishment.…

Related Documents