The Case Against Capital Punishment

Great Essays
We are taught from an early age that two wrongs do not make a right. In that sense, when one condones capital punishment, which is murdering a being under lawful ruling for a heinous crime done, we are saying we have the right to take someone’s life. The question is, by achieving this, are we less guilty? Capital punishment has more flaws than the justice it has to offer; it should be abolished. Capital punishment should be abolished because there are too many innocent people sentenced to death, death penalty trials are much more expensive than life imprisonment, there are botched executions, unfairness against the economically disadvantaged, and racism is present in the trials.
Capital Punishment has been the forefront for debate for many
…show more content…
Believe it or not, “per person, the death penalty is probably one of the most expensive state programs, and it produces no measurable gain in public safety. While states were spending millions of dollars on a single capital case, the average police budget had to be cut by 7 percent this year” ( qtd. in Jost 980). The United States is having economic problems at the moment, and would it not be smarter to save that amount of money? So much money is spent on these cases in the name of justice, even though they would get punishment enough by being imprisoned for life. For example, “in Texas, a death penalty case costs an average of $2.3 million, about three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest security level for 40 years ” (qtd. in “Facts about the Death Penalty”). Instead of saving that money up, we use it for a flawed system that is full of holes everywhere that serves no positive purpose. The few positive purposes it claims to have are actually flawed and …show more content…
A botched execution trial is an execution trial that is not performed correctly; it is carried out incorrectly. Botched executions go against the eighth amendment which prohibits federal government from imposing cruel or unusual punishment. Botched executions are not done on purpose, but there is always a chance for an error, a slight margin that should not be overlooked. I would like to be assured that the criminals wouldn’t suffer at all, because as humans we believe that would be too cruel. It is what separates our mentality from the criminal’s mentality. We have a mind and a conscience that helps us decide what is morally right or wrong. In the article “Death Penalty,” it states how a man sentenced to death testified that he felt his whole body being burnt (Kiener). Problems like these make the death penalty inhumane, giving a strong reason for it not to be legal in America. Why do we need to practice it? Many other countries do not practice it, yet they are as safe as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Due to this, capital punishment has caused people all over the world to change their beliefs about what charge men who have done heinous crime should be given. Capital Punishment is not right because when chosen, the lives…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although it may seem expensive, keeping the prisoners in prison is cheaper than the death penalty. According to Costanzo, “Between 1977 and 1996, California spent more than $1 billion on its death penalty but managed to execute only five men (Costanzo, pg. 61).” If executing prisoners costs more than just…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “A Strong Argument Against Capital Punishment”, Lincoln Caplan expands upon Connecticut's recent choices about capital punishment. Connecticut is one of several states in the United States that brought the issue of capital punishment to the Supreme Court for debate and discussion. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the death penalty is unconstitutional in the state of Connecticut. In this debate, the Democratic legislative side leaned against capital punishment; while the Republican legislative side leaned towards capital punishment. The Democratic side reasons that the death penalty violates the state constitution against excessive punishments.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “It's ten more times expensive to kill them than keep them alive” states David Mccartin. So if it less expensive the keep them alive than kill them then why are why sentencing people to the death penalty? Isn't that one of the reasons that we are sentencing people to die, because it costs to much to keep them alive? “ In 2007, time and money were the reasons that New Jersey became the first state to ban executions since the US Supreme court reinstated the death penalty in 1976” says the NBC News. New Jersey actually looked at the statistic and the facts about the death penalty and realized that they are putting a lot of time and money into something when there is another way that is cheaper and faster and they wouldn't have to worry about killing innocents.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To keep one prisoner on the death row costs $90,000 for the United States taxpayers. Cases without capital punishment involved cost up to $740,000, while $1.26 million is spent in cases where the death penalty is present. It not only for a moral cause, but also for the costs it takes to go through the death penalty process. It is understandable that governments find this sort of punishments a way to maintain the safety of their population, it has not been as effective as it should…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A man named Cameron Todd Willingham who resided in Texas, was convicted of murder in 1992, it was believed that he had set his home on fire with his three children still alive. With this evidence he was put to death in 2002. Later after further evidence was discovered it was sadly too late for Willingham, it was found that none of the evidence used against him was in fact valid. They said they simply misinterpreted the evidence, that the fire was just an accident. They sentenced an innocent, grieving man to death.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government could be using this money to create a better community for the people. According to Charles M. Harris, “All the states death sentences to life imprisonment would immediately result in millions of dollars in savings per year” (Harris). This reveals that the government is spending too much time focusing on the death penalty and not enough time trying to maintain a safe society for the people. The death penalty should also be abolished because it is a cruel punishment. It does not solve any conflict.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1995, at the age of 16, a child, whose name has not been open to the public, was accused of the murder of a New Orleans boy. The girlfriend of the murdered victim was present at the time of the crime, said that she “would never forget that face” as she identified the child as her boyfriend’s murderer. Two other people claimed to have seen the accused child at the scene of the crime. Right before the murder, the accused child was recorded on camera playing basketball with his friends, also in the video there was a clock showing the current time.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a government sanctioned law by which person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. The crimes that result in death are known by capital offences. For example: rape, torture, treason, kidnapping, murder. Capital punishment was common in the past, now a days the large majority discontinued the process.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many Americans argue that capital punishment is a bad public policy, and that it is unconstitutional. In 1968, only 38 percent of all Americans supported the death penalty (Hickey, 2013). As of 2013, there…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has continuously been used ever since European settlers brought it over in the seventeenth century. “The first recorded execution in the new colonies was that of Captain George Kendall in the Jamestown colony of Virginia in 1608” (“Part I: History of the Death Penalty”). He was executed for being a spy for Spain. The death penalty varied and each colony had different laws regarding it during colonial times. In Virginia, Governor Sir Thomas Dale enacted the Divine, Moral, and Martial Laws.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Dieter explains, “The death penalty is much more expensive than it’s closest alternative – life imprisonment with no parole. Capital trials are longer and more expensive at every step than other murder trials. Pre-trial motions, expert eye witness investigations, jury selection, and the necessity for two trials – one on guilt and one on sentencing – make capital cases extremely costly, even before the appeals process begins. Guilty pleas are almost unheard of when the punishment is death. In addition, many of these trials result in life sentences rather than the death penalty, so the state pays the cost of life imprisonment on top of the expensive trial.”…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a subject that can be and has been debated for lengthy amounts of time. There are still many countries that perform executions today, but many of these countries differ from the United States greatly. While the death penalty has been used as early as eighteenth century B.C., there is no doubt that there are many factors that make the death penalty a questionable subject in the modern United States. The death penalty should not be utilized in the United States because it is costly, inhumane, and inaccurate.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They say that it would be cheaper to just put them to death and better our society. They may argue “murder is murder, a person has to pay for the crime that they committed.” However, what many people do not know is it actually costs more to put people to death than it does to keep them in prison for the rest of their lives. According to Forbes, it is 10 times more expensive to kill an inmate than to keep him or her alive. “The annual cost of the death penalty in the state of California is $137 million compared to the cost of lifetime incarceration of 11.5 million” (Erb).…

    • 1772 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A study of Los Angeles County trials has shown that the average trial in which prosecutors demand the death penalty costs $1,898,323, while a murder trial where the death penalty is not sought comes in at $627,322. Death penalty is the most expensive because the constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for any capital cases. The process is required to make sure that innocent men and women are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and also to protect the innocent person from getting executed. According to George Sjostrom, “The cost of the death penalty is too high, both in dollars and in emotional pain,” (192). If we replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, it will cost millions less and also ensures that the public is safe and protected and we will also eliminate the risk of…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays