The Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished

Good Essays
Have you ever heard the sound of someone’s neck snapping as they fall to their death with a noose around their neck? If you were around in the early 1600s, public hanging was pretty popular and not uncommon to see on the everyday streets. In today’s society, hanging has become an obsolete form of capital punishment. Even though with todays methods being more humane and not as violent, people still try to abolish the capital punishment act; the main reason being: that there is no deterrence factor in the death penalty, the death penalty is racially biased, and that it is cheaper to keep someone in prison for life than it is to execute them. And people will argue these facts all day everyday, even though they are all false.
To begin, capital punishment should not be abolished because it actually does deter crimes such as murder. Professors Hashem Dezhbakhsh, Paul H. Rubin, and Joanna M. Shepherd of Emory University found that on average that each execution resulted in 18 fewer murders. If the only punishment that people would receive for murdering someone would to be locked up in a cell and never have to worry about food, shelter, or health care anymore; then there wouldn’t be any deterrence at all. Because there are a lot of people in the world who are homeless or have nothing going for them in life could easily just walk up and kill someone just so
…show more content…
People are going to argue the matter most likely until the end of time. But capital punishment should still not be abolished for the fact that it has been easily proven to be a very effective deterrent, and has also been proven not to be racially biased. The system is still flawed in costing so much for capital punishment cases, with them just being drawn out and reviewed over and over. But in the end, capital punishment is meant to help protect lives and deter any future acts of wrongful doing, so the cost of a spared innocent life should never have to come into

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    But a number of people are still against the death penalty for moral reasons, even though, it would bring them safety. In Stanley Marcus’s article, “Public Safety Requires the Death Penalty” Marcus questions convicted murderers about their crimes, “they had no hesitation in killing again and again because they were subject to no more severe punishment than if they were convicted of robbery - and often even less.” (New York Times Article Marcus). We need capital punishment to frighten criminals and to get rid of them when they do wrong. Clearly, these criminals have no morals about killing, so why should we risk our safety to keep them alive? The convicted killers even admitted that they had no hesitation in killing the first time and they would have no hesitation killing again.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To their way of thinking, the death penalty permanently incapacitates the criminal, but they believe that life without parole does as well. On the other hand, if we keep murderers in prison, will they be released only to commit other dreadful crimes? A significant number do. A lifetime imprisonment can 't stop anyone from killing other inmates or guards, because they most likely have nothing to lose by doing so. Many people have been found innocent after years on death row due to advanced technology that wasn 't available/ not used in their initial case or by additional witnesses coming forward.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Emory University researchers, including Paul Rubin, said, “The national sorting of crime rates each execution prevented 18 deaths.” That is 18 lives saved due to capital punishment. However, there are several why reasons the death penalty could be abolished. Comparatively, the death penalty is considered an unjust act towards humanity. That “an eye for an eye” isn’t necessarily the right way to handle such heinous crimes. Whereas most of the United States feel as though life without parole would be the best option for these criminals.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are always cases where people are being released from the prison for a crime they did not commit. Modern technology aides to prove that innocence of the people. Koch argues that records fail to show that innocent person has died; however, if the “murders” were put on death penalty, the cases of innocent people would have never opened and the innocent people would be dead for no reason…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When a person is killing a person, they do not think about the consequences, they just do it. While group B Americans say they should suffer in jail for the rest of their lives or how the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said, “The death penalty costs more, delivers less, and puts innocent lives at risk. Life without parole provides swift, severe, and certain punishment.” (qtd. in Procon.org)Despite of each other’s differences on how to punish the criminal, they both can agree on wanting the victim’s family to have some sort of indemnity. Although all research points on life without parole being a better choice for punishment, it is not just about what the research is saying.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In addition, although it is true that capital punishment might deter criminals from committing heinous crimes and might help restore a society back to its peaceful state, it has been statistically proven that capital punishment fails to deter crime. The deathpnalty.org article “The death penalty fails to deter crime” argues this assertion saying, “Moreover, states without the death penalty have much lower murder rates. The South accounts for 80% of US executions and has the highest regional murder rate”. This proves that states that have abolished capital punishment have fewer murder rates compared to states that still implement the practice, hence showing that anyone who commits a crime would not be deterred by capital punishment. On the other hand, it shows that abolishing capital punishment might be more beneficial to a society as it might lower the rates of crime in that…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Keeping the Death Penalty When people make a bad choice and get sent to jail they are only in there for a short period of time before going home. For some people they are in jail for a lifetime, and they get the death penalty. Some people do not think the death penalty should still be allowed because of its cruelty. The death penalty should remain as an acceptable punishment because it can be used as a deterrent for serious crimes, other criminals can learn from other death penalty recipients, and the death penalty is by far more humane than past executions forms. The death penalty can be used as a deterrent for serious crimes.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of these reasons is because of how inconsistent it can be at times. This is when the government places somebody on death row, they often do not follow through with the execution. Iowa State University student Christine Notis states that only a fraction of death-row prisoners are in fact executed, murderers do not feel hindered by the threat of capital punishment…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “There is no way to tell how many of the more than 1,450 people executed since 1976 may also have been innocent. Courts do not generally entertain claims of innocence when the defendant is dead.” (Death Penalty Information Center) However, opponents to capital punishment will still oppose it even when there is absolute proof the defendant committed the crime. “If there was a video of a man burning a family alive opponents of capital punishment would still oppose taking that man's life.” (Prager) Murderers who are kept alive setting their peers at risk of being murdered as well such as guards and other inmates. This moreover cheapens the cost of human life as if keeping this one person alive is worth more dead. And now with Forensics and DNA the idea of someone getting falsely persecuted is virtually zero.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is worth it to take into consideration that without this concept death would be an appropriate punishment for all who use force for whatever crime they are committing. A lack of justice being properly served would also encourage the citizens to take justice into their own hands since the state will not do anything to properly punish the criminal. It is immoral to not properly punish a person who has committed such a horrendous crime. “The criminal is also executed humanely; in no way is he subjected to torture or any form of cruelty. All states that use the death penalty use lethal injection; the days of subjecting a prisoner to hanging or the electric chair are long gone in the US.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics