Capital Punishment Is Death Wrong

Improved Essays
Capital Punishment is Dead Wrong
Capital punishment, such as the death penalty, is an intolerable denial of civil liberties and is inconsistent with the fundamental values of our democratic system; the death penalty is uncivilized in theory and unfair and inequitable in practice. There should not be a death penalty in action. It isn’t as effective as other options out there, and is morally wrong. The death penalty isn’t the best form of prevention, closure and isn’t the economical smart choice. In addition to that, it stirs an immense deal of controversy.
The death penalty is not the most efficient form of prevention for offenders. The excuse being used for putting or keeping the death penalty in action for prevention is incompetent reasoning.
…show more content…
In the long run a substantial number of victims feel uncomfortable with the idea of the offender who had been sentenced to death (Kritische Houding). This also deprives the victims of closure; now they will never have the opportunity to hear the reason, explanation, or excuse to the offender’s actions. This “corporal punishment” is not a remedy, granted it may provide instant gratification, all the victim’s close ones genuinely want is to bring back life. There are other forms of punishment, such as eternal imprisonment with a minimal of facilities, bread, water, and no one to …show more content…
A decent country does not punish eye for an eye. What’s the difference between you and the killer if you act in the same manner? How can you say that killing is wrong by killing a person? You cannot; it’s contradictory. Also the majority is against the death penalty. As a democracy the death penalty should be a democratic choice. “An eye for an eye will only make the whole world blind.” (Ghandi) Execution is a messy action, and with it comes copious questions. Where do you draw the line? Drawing a line is arbitrary. Weather you give the death penalty for multiple murders, a political murder, abuse, or drug distributors it will be a difficult decision and not ours as a society to make. No one should have the power to choose who gets the live and who has to die. Another issue with execution is that prosecutors and judges are only human meaning that they will make mistakes.
Since 1973, 156 people on death row have been released due to being innocent. Another problem that the death penalty opens up is the fact that a doctor’s presence is mandatory as they will be involved as long as the use of lethal injections stays. When lethal injections don’t work correctly a doctor will be required to assist, but the situation at hand may clash with the oath of Hippocrates (Hippocratic Oath) or their personal morality, as ample people in that field want to help people be healthy. With the death penalty in place innocent people

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There is no room for vengeance and a revenge stance in our justice system. The arguing stance for the death penalty says it deters murders, but in reality, the death penalty just leads to another loss of human life - regardless of the murder being an execution. When somebody tortures another human being, the government does not decide to torture that person in return. It’s the same for a rapist; the government does not rape the rapist. So, why does the government decide to murder the murderer?…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This should be the start in stopping the Death Penalty because it 's morally wrong just like murdering is but just because it 's run by the government and the justice system doesn’t make it okay! It is unavoidably evident, that ethnic discrimination racial bias, apartheid, is all a part of the administration of capital punishment in America. (Bedau, Cassell) This is saying that racism in Capital Punishment is unavoidable, no matter what in this world today the minorities and poor won’t ever get the benefit of the doubt. It means that even though racism happens right in front of people they act as nothing happens. This help proves how inhumane this country in the way it is running.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    You can’t punish someone based on what they did; Subjectivism will give anyone on this planet a chance to avoid the death penalty. How you might ask, to someone murder might be the biggest sin in the world, but in this system that’s not a moral fact. It’s just how you feel and your opinion towards the objective but again there is no moral objective fact towards your statement. A view like this is what we need, other people can justify that a murderer doesn’t deserve the death penalty. People will open their minds more broadly and look at the person as a human being.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Burns this punishment should be death, but what about the person’s fundamental rights 's to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Although Burns does not directly address it in this chapter, I believe he feels that when you commit a crime you lose these fundamental rights. But are these not fundamental rights that everyone is guaranteed under the Constitution? Their is no clause in the Constitution that says unless your a murder, you lose these rights. Allowing the government to legally kill the guilty person is wrong, and violates this person’s legal rights.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, it is inhumane. Second, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment. Third, there are innocents being killed unbeknownst to the common public. Death penalty is an inhumane act that contradicts our very nature. It is not only something that questions our humanity but also tells us what kind of society we want to live in.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once they are dead its over no mulligans, so it should be difficult to make this decision. Koch has a great quote where he says; “If government functioned only when the possibility of error didn 't exist, government wouldn 't function at all.” meaning that government his flawed at all levels and should not be trusted with life. The most important replay Koch gives is does the death penalty cheapen the cost of a life. The death penalty must be seen as the ultimate punishment and not throw around. Yes Koch says if you cannot measure the cost of a human life, but murder can be a ruthless crime, but to condemn another man to death is not only costing that man his life but the emotional weight on the judge jury and the…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s not making things better, but only worse, specially to their families! The Death Penalty is a violation of natural rights. We need to replace the Death Penalty and make it a safer and more inexpensive option. It does not guarantee safety for innocent victims, and it does not follow the goals and promises to our nation. The Death Penalty is very effective, and does not make things get better.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It does not solve any conflict. These people are still doing the same convictions and some worst. According to Daniel Raphael, “Capital punishment is inherently cruel and unusual and has no place within a ‘civilized society.’ Capital punishment is the process of killing someone no matter how it is framed” (Raphael). This reveals that the death penalty is not the best choice for a punishment. A person already suffers in jail for life, so why should the government put someone to…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Actually I do not want to say that all mentally handicapped people should be exposed to the death penalty because it is not good for rule of society and humanity. However, some people pose fatal danger to the society in highly an inhumane way, like as this example. In such a way, the death penalty becomes crucial for the benefit of the society. I claim each criminal, do not care how inhuman s/he is, and should be given the minimum one chance to modification him/herself. So, I do not recommend the death penalty for people who have done only one killing.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans today tend to believe that the death penalty is inhumane and if the government kills someone they are decreasing the value of life. However, such accusations are simply not true.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics