Capital Punishment And The Death Penalty: Basic Human Rights

1512 Words 7 Pages
Capital punishment is a denial of the most basic human rights; it violates one of the most fundamental principles under widely accepted human rights law, in which that states must recognize the right to life. The UN General Assembly has called for an end to capital punishment and human rights organizations agree that it breaks fundamental human rights standards. In the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, under Article 3 life is said to be a human right. This makes the death penalty our most significant human rights violation. If governments have the right and power to extinguish lives, they also have the ability to deny access to every other right stated in the Declaration. This first most imperative right provides foundation to every other human right. The beginning and ending point for a human right based analysis must be that capital punishment is never steady with crucial human rights standards.
Besides denying the right to life, other basic rights are frequently breached in capital punishment’s application. The death penalty has been found to break the denial against cruel, inhumane, and degrading
…show more content…
This comprehension has prompted progress in the nullification of capital punishment around the world. 35 years ago, just 16 nations had put an end to capital punishment for all crimes, while today that number has grown to 104. In addition, of those that still have capital punishment in their law, 35 are abolitionist by practice and have not executed anybody in at least 10 years. In 2010, just 23 nations were known to have executions. Consistently, a large portion of the world 's executions occur in just a couple of nations, and the United States is among those countries. From 2007 to 2011, the United States executed 220 individuals. America’s frequency of executions is met only by Saudi Arabia, Yemen, North Korea, Iran, and

Related Documents