Argumentative Essay On Capital Punishment

Improved Essays
Capital punishment is a huge controversy, but not necessarily a new development. Capital punishment is the execution of a death sentence for a criminal, while being different from the death penalty, which is the sentence of death. That death can come from electrocution or lethal injection or even hanging and firing squad in the past. This is such a huge controversy because of the fact that it is seen as legally murdering someone, but the death penalty is used as a deterrent. This particular deterrent has been around for hundreds of years. If the world sees someone die because they committed a certain act, then if they fear dying or have too much to lose, they will decide it outweighs them wanting to commit that act. That is not how everyone …show more content…
Some people see it as an eye for an eye type of ordeal, while others see it as legal murder. According to Steven Goldberg (1974), “one who supports capital punishment can foreclose further discussion by asserting that an eye must be taken for an eye, even if the taking of an eye does not deter anyone any more than would a lesser penalty.” Some people believe that having the death penalty creates a safer environment. Edwin R. Keedy (1912) believes that having the death penalty in places prevents some of these awful criminals from taking their bad behavior even further and taking someone’s life. According to Roger Hood (2016), the death penalty is not any more of a deterrent than life …show more content…
Capital Punishment. It does not matter what the name is, it is a highly debatable subject. The point of any punishment is to try and deter or prevent others from doing the same wrong again. If someone watches someone else be put to death for killing someone, they might think twice about murdering someone, but this is not always the case. As a deterrent, capital punishment works good, except for those who feel a compulsion to kill, like Ted Bundy. People who have a compulsion to kill or commit other appalling acts, are not going to be deterred, but rather they will hide. There would be more atrocious crimes if it was not for the punishments that are sure to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He becomes a big supporter of the death penalty which is dominant in his paper where he list different objections to the death penalty than counteracts them. Koch starts off by saying that the death penalty is simply barbaric. The action itself is not barbaric due to its purpose of killing without suffering. A down side of killing people is you cannot take the death penalty back. Once they are dead its over no mulligans, so it should be difficult to make this decision.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I honestly do not full heartedly support the death penalty, but I think there are rare cases in which it would be just and in the best interest of the safety of the general public. Justice can be defined as being “fair, impartial, [and] giving a deserved response” (“List of the Virtues”). If the trial for the crime is fairly administered, and we are certain with no doubt that the person on death row is guilty, the death penalty ought to be justified. Not every crime or even murder mandates the use of capital punishment. However, if the just punishment for the crime is the death penalty, the executioner and those involved in the conviction could still be considered virtuous because they are being just.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Just because capital punishment may not deter a few individuals from ending up in death row, it does not mean that specific deterrence is not taken into consideration. It does not matter whether a person is mentally ill or depressed behind bars, the last thing a person wants is to die for a crime that have committed in which they will later regret. One does not commit capital punishment because they want to, but because they are caught in the heat of the moment (Reams and Putnam, 2011). In other words, a murderer, to some extent, feels remorse with regard to killing a person. For some, however, they will feel remorse immediately, whereas to others, they will feel regretful at a later time.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Against Death Penalty

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    That is exactly what the death penalty does it helps deter someone from killing another person by threatening their own life by capital punishment. Now of course as with all other controversial topics not everyone is on board with this idea. One of those people is named Michael Welch. Welch believes that the death penalty should be abolished. Welch also believes that there are two reasons for the dealt penalty, one being…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the death penalty deters murder and we did not use it, murders of innocent people will occur which could have been prevented. If the death penalty does not deter murder and we use it, executions of murderers will occur with out deterring. Preventable executions are preferable to preventable murders of innocent people. Of the two morally undesirable outcomes, we must pick one with the preferable results. Therefore, we should use the death penalty”.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the justice system tries its best to find the right people who committed a crime, it is made up of humans who can and will make mistakes. Because of this, people who are actually innocent can be determined guilty. If they are sentenced to the death penalty (and the state goes through with it) and new evidence (or even old evidence) shows that they are actually innocent, they cannot bring that person back to life. If they are sentenced to life in prison, however, and they are found to be not guilty, they are able to be released from prison. It is not an ideal situation but it is better than dying for a crime that a person did not commit.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (1350)Against the Death Penalty: An Analysis of Reiman’s “Moderate” Retribution Theory This argument against the death penalty will examine the “moderate retribution theory of Jeffrey Reiman. In this theory, the premise of retribution for murder defines the validation of the death penalty, yet not in the abuse of justice found in the American criminal justice system. Reiman believes that the death penalty should be abolished because criminals are not always cognitively aware of the crimes that they commit, which demands the rehabilitation of the individual. Reiman argues against the death penalty because it offers an extreme form of punishment for crimes that are rarely “conscious” in the mind of the criminal. This moderate form of retribution…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capital punishment is a type of punishment whereby culprits are sentenced to death penalty or death sentenced based on the capital offence that they have committed. This type of particular punishment do has both its advantage and disadvantages. Advantages 1. It discourages monstrous criminal activities Through the establishment of this type of punishment most the criminal will be in fear to face the consequences of death sentence thus these will make them reluctant to committing these criminal activities and it will be also a warning to the potential criminals. 2.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a Kantian world with moral laws, capital punishment does not seem to be a theoretical solution for punishing murders. But when someone does commit murder those individuals render their rights, and henceforth would acknowledge their action with consequences, such as capital punishment. Jeffrey H. Reiman presents various argument against the use of capital punishment with no adequate evidence of effectiveness. Capital punishment is a reasonable method to punish offenders for crimes committed, and is used for extremes heinous acts; it is also used under great scrutiny. Instead, Jeffrey H. Reimn conveys the notion of any violation of moral duties should be dealt with that same manner to the offender.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Adherents of this position favor that there should be a law that allows for capital punishment, but it should be rarely used. Those in favor of this qualified position propose that the death penalty should only be used if the victim’s family wants the murderer to be sentenced to death, if the murderer has escaped prison before, or if the murderer is a serial killer. The reasons a proponent of this position has is that listening to the victim’s family might keep them at ease a little more knowing that they got some type of closure. Another reason someone with the beliefs of this position has is that if someone has already escaped prison before, then he or she should be given the death penalty because that person might be able to escape again. It would give the citizens a feeling of safety knowing a potential threat will not be on the loose again.…

    • 2346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays