Cantor introduces the Monasticism as an unknown method in Christianity. He also details the crisis of the event that occurred in the western areas. In the article is reveals the development of the western monasticism in the second half of the eleventh century, which Cantor states the critical importance that period.
The crisis refers to the medieval history and the ending of the Benedictine century in Western Europe between the future of religion, civilization and culture. The crisis process came with several important scholars that had great methods. These great’s names were Sackur, Hauck, Hallinger, and Knowles; it was known at this period that these four were important role models in the medieval history. St. Benedict created a religious …show more content…
Military would be extremely important to monasteries in the Normandy and Anglo-Norman England society. Cantor explains the years 1050 to 1130, with 1050 being important because this is the time the nine Norman monasteries would owe the knight service and rely on providing a contingent to all knights but also it showed duke-having problems within the lay barons. Between the years of 1050 and 1130 the Benedictine monks where becoming very dominate into developing the Latin Christians background and the western government to starting its very own fundamental aspects. The Benedictine would show weakness in their religious and culture ways of life, with that being said cantor describes the two aspects being a critical difference within the culture. Internal and external would be affective towards the monastic …show more content…
This would become a drastic change within western society, because the monks brought a specific education that they shared to their people and this way of life would mode their culture to sticking with tradition. When word got out that the monks were losing control of the education people tend to see the negative changes within the society from a whole development standpoint. The positive changes came with the demographic, political, and economic growth. These changes would spread the western society into being a more calm area where the people could enjoy the levels of its own philosophy, law and theology ways in the fourth century. It is clear to argue with the statement that Cantor has offered the readers explaining that the two aspects of being internal and external are the biggest impact of transforming the entire European civilization. Many can argue that this can be a true or just simply an opinion statement. Many forget churches, religion, and certain battles being impacts as well on changing the civilization crisis. This crisis would eventually lead up to the Gregorian reform movement, a movement that brought a series of reforms that was led by Pope Gregory Vll that dealt with integrity of the clergy and representing independence within itself. This system wanted all churches to be free from the states control but the biggest thing about the reform was to divest Western kingship.
The crisis refers to the medieval history and the ending of the Benedictine century in Western Europe between the future of religion, civilization and culture. The crisis process came with several important scholars that had great methods. These great’s names were Sackur, Hauck, Hallinger, and Knowles; it was known at this period that these four were important role models in the medieval history. St. Benedict created a religious …show more content…
Military would be extremely important to monasteries in the Normandy and Anglo-Norman England society. Cantor explains the years 1050 to 1130, with 1050 being important because this is the time the nine Norman monasteries would owe the knight service and rely on providing a contingent to all knights but also it showed duke-having problems within the lay barons. Between the years of 1050 and 1130 the Benedictine monks where becoming very dominate into developing the Latin Christians background and the western government to starting its very own fundamental aspects. The Benedictine would show weakness in their religious and culture ways of life, with that being said cantor describes the two aspects being a critical difference within the culture. Internal and external would be affective towards the monastic …show more content…
This would become a drastic change within western society, because the monks brought a specific education that they shared to their people and this way of life would mode their culture to sticking with tradition. When word got out that the monks were losing control of the education people tend to see the negative changes within the society from a whole development standpoint. The positive changes came with the demographic, political, and economic growth. These changes would spread the western society into being a more calm area where the people could enjoy the levels of its own philosophy, law and theology ways in the fourth century. It is clear to argue with the statement that Cantor has offered the readers explaining that the two aspects of being internal and external are the biggest impact of transforming the entire European civilization. Many can argue that this can be a true or just simply an opinion statement. Many forget churches, religion, and certain battles being impacts as well on changing the civilization crisis. This crisis would eventually lead up to the Gregorian reform movement, a movement that brought a series of reforms that was led by Pope Gregory Vll that dealt with integrity of the clergy and representing independence within itself. This system wanted all churches to be free from the states control but the biggest thing about the reform was to divest Western kingship.