A Comparison of Canadian Telecom to US Telecom
As we know of many, The staunch difference in standards of service between consumers within the United States and Canada, I would say. A core and elemental history of our mobile technologies have evolved and have come a long way since the founding of GSM or Global Standard for Mobile Communication Starting with with the HSCSD (High Speed Circuit Switched Data) technology. This tech was hardly stable let alone have any capacity to provide internet service, But you have to remember the time era and the internet at this time was only beginning to evolve into popular use, This is pretty much 1999, and this technology HSCSD was only able to provide 38.4 kbps and this speed is pretty much comparable …show more content…
Let's go back to the beginning of the twentieth century. A comparison of Rogers Communications and AT&T (Known as Bell) how they evolved. Just to clarify Bell Telephone Company has no relation to the current Canadian Bell Mobility, Ironically AT&T owned a significant share within Rogers. The difference between these two is where they began, They began in similar places but yet find themselves in industries opposite of each other. Sir Edward Rogers Sr founded his vacuum tube company in 1927 selling vacuum tubes for optical lines. Throughout the 20th century Rogers grew and invested as a cable company that continued to dominate the cable market buying out many of its competitors till the early eighties where it began to invest mobile technology. AT&T on the other began as the only telephony company in the United States till a US justice order disbanding the company into smaller entities. It would be known as the Southwestern Bell Company till the early nineties where officially became known as AT&T by then the first mobile phone was invented, car phones were available and the …show more content…
The difference is in the markets and the style of regulation between the US and Canada, You see in the markets of Canada there is a major difference between those and the US. The Big three in Canada work together rather then compete with their ties to CRTC, In economics this is called a "Cartel". However in the US market The big companies compete to sell the most data,air time and SMS as much as much as possible whether to it's own subscribers or other businesses, even more or so local providers using their network.This is because of a better regulation on law of how ISPs including mobile companies should regulate their net neutrality, Fiercely debated and yet emotionally fought for, What we broadcast and how should we broadcast it has been a fierce debate. The problem with the Canadian market and what makes it unappealing to foreign investors is the large land mass of the country and small population, The Canadian market continues to be locked out to foreign investors. The ability of no other option leaves Canadians with a oligarchy on the Canadian market, its a product of our
As we know of many, The staunch difference in standards of service between consumers within the United States and Canada, I would say. A core and elemental history of our mobile technologies have evolved and have come a long way since the founding of GSM or Global Standard for Mobile Communication Starting with with the HSCSD (High Speed Circuit Switched Data) technology. This tech was hardly stable let alone have any capacity to provide internet service, But you have to remember the time era and the internet at this time was only beginning to evolve into popular use, This is pretty much 1999, and this technology HSCSD was only able to provide 38.4 kbps and this speed is pretty much comparable …show more content…
Let's go back to the beginning of the twentieth century. A comparison of Rogers Communications and AT&T (Known as Bell) how they evolved. Just to clarify Bell Telephone Company has no relation to the current Canadian Bell Mobility, Ironically AT&T owned a significant share within Rogers. The difference between these two is where they began, They began in similar places but yet find themselves in industries opposite of each other. Sir Edward Rogers Sr founded his vacuum tube company in 1927 selling vacuum tubes for optical lines. Throughout the 20th century Rogers grew and invested as a cable company that continued to dominate the cable market buying out many of its competitors till the early eighties where it began to invest mobile technology. AT&T on the other began as the only telephony company in the United States till a US justice order disbanding the company into smaller entities. It would be known as the Southwestern Bell Company till the early nineties where officially became known as AT&T by then the first mobile phone was invented, car phones were available and the …show more content…
The difference is in the markets and the style of regulation between the US and Canada, You see in the markets of Canada there is a major difference between those and the US. The Big three in Canada work together rather then compete with their ties to CRTC, In economics this is called a "Cartel". However in the US market The big companies compete to sell the most data,air time and SMS as much as much as possible whether to it's own subscribers or other businesses, even more or so local providers using their network.This is because of a better regulation on law of how ISPs including mobile companies should regulate their net neutrality, Fiercely debated and yet emotionally fought for, What we broadcast and how should we broadcast it has been a fierce debate. The problem with the Canadian market and what makes it unappealing to foreign investors is the large land mass of the country and small population, The Canadian market continues to be locked out to foreign investors. The ability of no other option leaves Canadians with a oligarchy on the Canadian market, its a product of our