Canadian Jury System Analysis

Improved Essays
The jury system came to Canada by the British settlers in the mid-1700s and is composed of 12 representatives of the community to provide judgment by peers (v+n). “The purpose of a trial is to answer the question of who did what to whom and whether such conduct is legal” (v+n). The jury acts as adjudicators and are called triers of facts that serve the purpose of listening to evidence and facts presented in court in order to decide who did what to whom and if such conduct was legal, out of the competing interpretations of events presented in court by the defendants and plaintiffs (v+n). The jury is presented with differing versions of one event and has the duty of taking into account all aspects of the case in order to make a final verdict

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Canadian Justice System

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When it comes to the Canadian Criminal Justice System, we ask many questions such as, “what is justice?”and “are equity and the rights of the accused being compromised in the name of efficiency?” Justice is when a person receives fairness and their moral rightness from the legal system which is decided by attorney 's, judges, legislatures, and by society. Based on this definition of justice, we wonder if equity and the rights of the accused is being compromised by the legal system. Many people may think that the Canadian Criminal Justice System may be unfair and not seek justice for those who deserve it, others may argue against that and believe that the Canadian Criminal Justice System shows equity and the rights of the accused. Sometimes…

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analysis: The Jury System

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Jury System by Kenneth Jost Are major changes needed? Should peremptory challenges be abolished? 1. What is at issue? What is the claim behind this issue?…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main concept of a voir dire is to determine whether a jury can be “fair, impartial arbiters of fact”. Potential jurors usually are selected from voter registration records for what is commonly referred to as jury duty. In the U.S., they must be from the same jurisdiction as the defendant. After a pool of potential jurors is selected, attorneys for both sides either suggest questions for the judge to ask, or they ask questions themselves of the jurors. The attorneys for both sides have a limited amount of “peremptory challenges,” with which they can bypass the judge and dismiss possible jurors for any reason.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The key topic that is under debate throughout this paper is jury nullification and how its procedures work within the justice system, as well as some of its strengths and weaknesses. There is quite a bit of controversy surrounding jury nullification being used as a primary rectification in the justice system as it tends to make equal outcomes become unequal outcomes. Jury nullification is a process in which a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty despite the fact that the defendant is actually guilty of the actions he or she is being charged for. The jury nullifies a law that is believed to be immorally wrong or wrongfully applied to the defendant.…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dual Court System

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The type of court structure we have in the United States is a dual court system. This means that every state has its own judicial system, that’s separate from the federal system, which is the same for every state. The state court includes trial courts of Limited Jurisdiction, Trial Court of General Jurisdiction, Intermediate Courts of Appeals, and the Appellate Court for a last resort. The Federal Court System includes District COurts, Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the Supreme COurt of the United States.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification To condemn a person for an act that he or she did that broke the law is hard to decide. The jury is there to assist so the decision of the case does not depend solely on the judge. A jury consists of usually twelve people. They are there to come up with a verdict based on the evidence presented to them at court.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Essay

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, this means that there may also be a prodigious amount of room for mistake in convictions. Therefore, the jury system is not as effective as a bench trial due to it not being judged by a professional on the subject of law, the manner in which the court selects jurors is unfair, and the way that the jury is forced to decide can cause some poor judgment. Judges are given the powers they have because they are professionals on their subject matter; however, a jury is not quite the same. A jury trial is a trial that has twelve randomly selected citizens coming to a verdict instead of a judge.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Court Cases

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On November 22, 2016, I sat in courtroom 507 of the Fresno County Superior Court, under the Honorable Judge Timothy Kams. Judge Kams was conducting a jury selection for a jury trial dealing with a felony DUI case. During the jury selection, I witnessed a Venire. A venire or jury pool, is a master list or jury list, from which a petit panel is selected, typically is based on names drawn from voter registration lists or lists of licensed drivers over eighteen years of age (Lippmann, 2014, p.518). I also witnessed a Voir Dire.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I only consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to its principles of its constitution.” Thomas Jefferson said this when talking about the jury system. He is saying that the jury process is one of the few ways that people can make sure that the government is following their own rules. People have been questioning the government system lately with everything that has been going on. For instance, Edward Snowden gave up his life to show the people of the United States what the government has been doing.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Main Juror Jury Functions

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What is the main function of a jury? Why is this duty imposed on the jury? Why do you believe some people do not want to perform their duty by sitting on a Jury? What are some of the potential issues or risks if they do? A juror, in this day and age, is needed in order for defendants to receive a fair and competent trial.…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For many Canadians, the media is their primary source of information related to events and occurrences that may be taking place within their community. As a primary source, the media holds significant weight in relation to the development of perceptions and understandings of both current and past events. These perceptions, while at times seemingly innocuous, can be uncritical or far-removed from the reality of the events as they exist outside of the framing of media depictions. Media depictions of crime, criminality and the criminal justice system, can, and often do, set the foundation for the development of understandings that are inconsistent with the experiences of those who are directly involved—in a professional capacity—with the Canadian criminal justice system. Consequently, these distorted, or perhaps more accurately, misinformed understandings, can lead to the development of myths that are perpetuated at the social and political level.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In today’s Canadian society, people are certain that the Criminal justice system with their almighty position and power has the responsibility to protect and serve the community. That being said, the fundamental purpose of the creation of criminal law is to maintain order within society and punish those who deviate beyond the social and legal norms (Robinson & Cahill, 2005). The idea of an innocent individual being wrongfully convicted of a criminal act committed by another person is astounding. The sole purpose of the system is to restrain those who are deemed deviant or mischiefs and are to be held accountable for their actions through the criminal justice system. Therefore, not to restrain the freedom of the individuals who are innocent.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You can, however, say that some of the jury would not be paying attention which could impact the trial but, a jury is made up of more than a couple of people. It is possible that a small portion of the jury would be listening to come up with a decision. This decision would either be the majority of the votes or the same decision would be chosen by people who were not paying attention to agree with the vast majority (Document D, Cartoon1). To continue, another reason for being in favor of jury systems is it prevents corruptions. In bench trials anyone can bribe the judge in order for them to win the case, but in jury trials you will not know who the people are until you show up in court.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The formation of the group is more in task orientation which all twelve jurors have common goal to be achieved. In the movie, the jurors are choice based on difference background and experience and the reason for the teams form is to fulfil his civic duty and social responsibility. The jurors have no relationships between each and other and they will not retain any relationship after the trial. It clearly show the negotiation process is a one off with served the short term purpose. The decision style is more analytical which…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays