Differences Between Canada And Us Constitution

Superior Essays
The U.S and Canada are very similar nations. They occupy the bulk of North America, share the same history of the British rule and rely on each other for trade and prosperity. These two sovereign states exhibit the same aspects and perceptions of the constitution and political culture. The constitution is defined as a government body that “lays down the ground rules for governance” (Larry, 2011). It also “constitutes the government” and “set up structures, offices and lawmaking procedures” (Larry, 2011). Understanding the constitution is vital in understanding Canada and the U.S citizens, their individual freedom, and fundamental principles that govern them.
United states constitution is one of the most important legal documents in the world. It is not only categorized as one of the oldest written constitutions but has also set precedent for so many other nations. The constitution was written by the founding fathers during the Philadelphia convention in 1776, passed by the Second Continental Congress in 1777, and ratified in 1781. The
…show more content…
Although not far off, these differences are apparent and manifest themselves in many ways. One of the most obvious differences between these two nations is their government structure. Canada has two executives, the Prime Minister and the Head of State, which is the Monarch of the United Kingdom. Whereas in America there is one executive –the President. The Prime Minister of Canada is a member of the legislature, unlike the American President. Also, Canadian legislature has sovereignty over the constitution, meaning that the judicial and legislative branches both exist inside of the legislature and thus there is no separation of powers as there is in the United States. Furthermore, Canada’s parliamentary system emphasizes more on efficiency while the United States of America’s presidential-congressional system emphasizes more on

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The federal government acts as a supreme authority of the land, which formed around the tri-parte system of checks and balances found in the presidency, judiciary, and the Congress. In contrast to the overriding authority of the British parliamentary system, the American government relies on the three branches to make critical decisions as an authority over the states. In comparison, however, Great Britain relies heavily on a legislative body in which decision are made through a federated system of governance. In the U.S., the Congress wields the same type of representational governing authority, which is not dissimilar from the methods used in the party system in British government. These are the territorial divisions of government, which makes Great Britain and the U.S. a type of federalized form of democracy: “Although some dispersal of power across territorial and/or functional units is characteristic of all democracies” (Schmitter and Karl 84).…

    • 1343 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Canadian Prime Minister

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Although it is promoted that candidates are over the age of 18, live within Canada and have citizenship. Eligibility is not nearly discussed to critiqued as much as in the states. The Prime Minister is expected to speak and or at least understand the two languages of Canada, French and English, a responsibility the President does not have to preform, seeing as there is no official language of the United States (1). The Canadian Prime Minister is given the title of Head of government, head of cabinet, leader of their political party (unless independent) and member of parliament. Unlike the states, Canada’s government works together to create and uphold law.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In responsible government model which is adopted by Canada, people vote only for the part of legislative branch which is a House of Commons. The other part of the Canadian legislative branch is the Senate which is appointed by the Prime-minister. Though, the Senate powers are limited, it is still worth mentioning that senators are appointed by life and can not be fired. Thus, if people are unhappy with the party and choose another one, the previous party might still have a majority seats in the Senate. Prime-minister who represents executive power is appointed by the Crown.…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the United States and Canada are bordering countries that share a continent their governments are quite different. The United States government runs on a presidential institutional system with a single member district. The United States has a federal government which allows power to be divided by the national government and local governments. However, Canada is fairly different. Canada operates on a parliamentary institutional system with a single member district.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Charter Of Rights Analysis

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Power is distributed between the federal and provincial government due to Canada being a federal state. Both levels of government shares the obligation and jurisdiction over particular sectors of law and divisions such as; health care, corrections and many more. The Queen of England is the head of the government and the Governor General acts as her representative in Canada and works alongside the Prime Minister, which leaves Canada as a constitutional monarchy. When Canada became a British colony, confederation, then came into play, forming a union between Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comparison of British and American political system The British and American political systems have both similarities and differences. Most notably, the British political system is a democratic constitutional monarchy, consisting of a monarch and a prime minister. The United States of America however, is a federal republic with a separation of power between three branches. Beyond these two key differences, the two countries have political similarities such as a dual-chamber, two dominating political parties as well as scheduled elections. Firstly, the United States of America has a political system based on federalism, whereas Britain is a constitutional monarchy.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many centuries, laws and rights have been society’s foundation for nations all around the world. Laws are rules that people are made to follow by the government; a right is something a person has that should not be taken away from them. Both play an important role in determining the order of society in a nation and over time, each country developed their own constitution. As early as the Magna Carta and as recent as the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, countries began developing written documents, in order to record and address the rights of individuals in their country. For Canada, this step was taken 34 years ago, with the introduction of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Despite their similarities in culture, Canada and the United States are run by vastly different political systems. Though both nations are federal states, Canada has a parliamentary system of government while the United States has a republic system (Wiseman 14-09-22). The American president and Canadian prime minister are both very influential figures, but this influence on their nations and governments manifests itself in different ways. There is great debate over which country’s system of government offers more power to its executive, and what exactly these powers entail. This essay will argue that Canadian prime ministers have far more and unrestrained powers than American presidents, but this comes at the cost of democracy.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the other hand, an essential aspect concerning the UK constitution is the concept of ministerial responsibility which asserts the fact that the head people in the executive should be members either of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. The UK Parliament is empowered to ‘enact primary legislation, to authorise secondary legislation and to scrutinise the actions of the government, acting as a checks and balances mechanisms’ on it, being the body providing legal power to the executive. Considering the strong relationship between them, the UK executive and legislative ‘are far from being separated’. A strong relevance in this sense has the fact that the Prime Minister could be leader of executive and of majority party in the legislative. In addition, the Parliament can also enforce the Government with the power to draft delegated…

    • 1815 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Federalism is a system of government which divides sovereignty between a central government and several constituent parts. This division is established constitutionally and lays out which powers of government are the sole jurisdiction of the national or provincial/state governments. However, this is merely the purest form of federalism, and one that does not necessarily exist. In Canada, powers are divided between the central and provincial governments in the constitution, and all those that are not explicitly divided, are under the domain of the central government, however, this has not prevented conflict over who should have jurisdiction over many areas. The tension between the Central governments and the Quebec government has often, in the…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays