Argumentative Essay: Is The Death Penalty?

Improved Essays
Does the death penalty deter crime, especially murder? Is the death penalty just? Should the death penalty be reformed? The death penalty also known as capital punishment continues to be an issue of controversy for many years. It seems that public opinion on the death penalty has changed over the year and is still changing, but there are still other people who believe that the death penalty is a good punishment and will continue to believe. Most of the time in my life, I often hear “An eye for an eye.” Most of the people strongly believe that if a criminal took someone’s life, then their lives should be also taken away as well, but I don’t think that will deter anyone from committing crimes because I strongly believe that we should kill the crime not the criminal. The death penalty has been the highest form of criminal punishment since the ancient times for a variety of offenses. The system gives the death penalty in the form of Hanging, Lethal Injection, Gas Chamber, Firing Squad, and Electrocution. I don’t think …show more content…
A study of Los Angeles County trials has shown that the average trial in which prosecutors demand the death penalty costs $1,898,323, while a murder trial where the death penalty is not sought comes in at $627,322. Death penalty is the most expensive because the constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for any capital cases. The process is required to make sure that innocent men and women are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and also to protect the innocent person from getting executed. According to George Sjostrom, “The cost of the death penalty is too high, both in dollars and in emotional pain,” (192). If we replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, it will cost millions less and also ensures that the public is safe and protected and we will also eliminate the risk of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This year the state of Nebraska abolished the use of the death penalty as a punishment for murder. The Nebraska legislature voted 30-19 to override the veto of Governor Pete Ricketts according to Berman (2015). A total of 19 states currently do not have the death penalty for reasons ranging from cost, the quality of the defense, and whether or not it is cruel and unusual punishment. The Eighth Amendment of the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, punishment to include torture, barbarous punishments, degrading punishments not known to the common law, and punishments so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the general moral sense (U.S. Const. amend.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty does not deter crime. It is viewed as inhumane and barbaric. Some argue that all human life is sacred. Some argue that the death penalty goes against every organized…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life is sacred. The majority of people in the state of Nebraska would agree to this. For this reason, taking the life of another has always been considered the most deplorable of crimes, one worthy of the harshest available punishment. Thus raises the question of the death penalty. The underlying question on this issue is if any kind of killing, regardless of reason, can be accepted.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the vast globe, thousands of people are sentenced to death annually (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). Should the government execute people who commit heinous crimes? In 2014, in the United States alone, 35 people were ripped of their lives on the execution table (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). It is a common belief that the death penalty is a sufficient punishment for people who commit hostile and death-provoking crimes. Yet, what justice is served by the taking of another human life?…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am writing this letter to convey my thoughts over the issue of the death penalty. The death penalty continues to be a matter of dispute and will be argues in the States for many years. The death penalty is currently used by 27 states and is used by the federal government for punishing federal crimes. However, in Texas, the death penalty should be banned, and instead of executing these criminals, the state of Texas should sentence them to life in prison. By abolishing death penalty, and instead of executing criminals, simply sentencing them for life in prison can help the United States save a significant amount of money.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty continues to be a hot topic of debate around the United States. There are those who debate whether the death penalty should be abolished and there are those who affirm or agree with the death penalty. There are those who say it is morally wrong to have the death penalty imposed while others say “an eye for an eye.” While these may be two of the biggest arguments against the death penalty there are also ones that state that the death penalty does not deter criminals from committing the same crime while several other studies show that it is a suitable deterrence for crime. Several states have already abolished the death penalty.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the debate with the motion “Abolish the Death Penalty”, Diann Rust-Tierney argues that the death penalty is an insecure and hurtful policy that does not help advance public safety. Diann claims that the death penalty is not giving the public any safety nor does it decrease violence. Arguing that it is a waste of taxpayer money that could be used to improve law enforcement training. She later argues that the death penalty is an outdated system that is bias towards race and color, claiming that black men are less likely to be sentenced to death even though they are most likely to be victims of homicide. Diann ends her argument with a humanitarian statement that we as humans have the ability to change our way of life and we should not have to take…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For as long as humans have lived in groups, a concept of punishment by the group on the individual has existed. Overtime this concept has evolved into the forms of justice we see today. Across the world, ideas of what constitutes adequate punishment to crime vary hugely. This difference is due to different social ideas of what is a fair response to delinquency. However an undeniable trend has been the abolishment of capital punishment.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment, a cruel way to end another human’s life would you not say? That is the opinion of eighteen states in the United States. As of April 30, 2015, there have been a total of 1,407 executions since 1976 (www.deathpenaltyinfo.org). Capital punishment dates back to 1976 where the Supreme Court used death penalty as a way of maintaining the minorities after the Civil War (University of Richmond Law Review, Stephen Bright, www.deathpenaltyinfo.org). Essentially, capital punishment was very much tied to race.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Jennifer Sullivan, a crime reporter who won a 2010 Pulitzer Prize, the difference in trials involving the death penalty and not involving the death penalty, is $1.06 million, with cases with the death penalty being more expensive. That’s not even including years of retrials, appeals, and waiting. After all of those trials, sometimes the court finds a convict not guilty. One example of this is Ray Hinton, a man who was wrongly convicted in 1985 and proceeded to spend the next 3 decades on death row for murders he did not commit. In that particular case, the state spent close to $30 million to ruin an innocent man’s life.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Dieter explains, “The death penalty is much more expensive than it’s closest alternative – life imprisonment with no parole. Capital trials are longer and more expensive at every step than other murder trials. Pre-trial motions, expert eye witness investigations, jury selection, and the necessity for two trials – one on guilt and one on sentencing – make capital cases extremely costly, even before the appeals process begins. Guilty pleas are almost unheard of when the punishment is death. In addition, many of these trials result in life sentences rather than the death penalty, so the state pays the cost of life imprisonment on top of the expensive trial.”…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The financial cost of the death penalty is one that is far greater than the cost of any other sentence. There are many things that drive the cost of the death penalty up that are not present in cases that end in a different sentence. Source A points out a few of the largest components to…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty. (In)humane? (In)effective? Is the death penalty an effective punishment for deserving criminals? The death penalty being an effective and humane deterrent to criminals has been a widespread debate for many years and there are several different viewpoints on the topic.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As statistics, have shown, it does cost an obscene amount of money to execute a person, however it can help save innocent lives, and there isn’t a price that can be put on that. In closing, if someone has committed a heinous crime and is given the death penalty it should be required for them to see it through. As mentioned earlier, this will allow the family to have closure and potentially deter future offenders. Capital punishment very well could solve more problems than originally…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrianna Coffee Dr. Huck GSTR 110 Capital Punishment The death penalty should never be applied as a punishment to a person convicted of intentionally killing another person because the death penalty is a costly, unfair punishment that does not benefit society as a whole. What is the death penalty? The death penalty is defined as “the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime.” (Definition of Death Penalty in English) Since 1976 there have been over fourteen hundred executions in the United States.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays