Get A Knife, Get A Dog, But Get Rid Of Guns, By Molly Ivins

Improved Essays
Firearm debates have run rampant in the past few years, people are starting to feel safe in their place in society. Unknowingly devising their own downfall, allowing others to choose their gun rights without a say. In her op-ed piece, "Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns" Molly Ivins argues that guns are not protected by the second amendment; and that you 're well within your means to defend yourself without them. I whole heartily disagree with Ivins ' views on guns, and believe guns are a fundamental right and necessity for today 's society.

I believe everyone has a right to their opinion, and if it 's supported by factual information can 't be denied. However, miss Ivins misleads us. Providing biased information in an attempt to
…show more content…
She uses common sense, crime, and accidental death as a valid reason to restrict and ban guns. You can 't deny these are good reasons to restrict gun rights to competent individuals. Ivins uses another leading statement that actually supports restitution as a better option over a ban on firearms. She states,”The comparison most often used is that of the automobile, another lethal object that is regularly used to wreak great carnage.” Like me I don 't think you 've ever killed anyone with your car. I think this easily supports that when a competent person uses something deadly with care there isn 't any unattended cause and effect …show more content…
You don 't know what fear is, tell you 've heard coyotes fighting with one of your pets. Seconds to decide their fates, if love is worth risking your life. Grabbing your shotgun, rifle, or handgun and stepping through the front door into darkness. Pulling the trigger, hoping the sound of discharging powder is enough to avoid conflict. Fearing you 're too late and your loving dog is dead and gone the meal to a hungry predator. Ivins say there is no more frontier, she is dead wrong. The frontier never disappeared. As humans in our own hubris; we forget to remember that we moved into this frontier and share it with bears, coyotes, and any number of hungry predators. Those that live in the cities, you think you 're safe, but the predators are still there. There aren 't bears or coyotes, there are even more deadly animals; there your fellow man. People who want to take from you, all you 've worked hard for, and they don 't carry knives they carry

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ivins primary topic in her article was about the dangers of guns and why we should ban them. In no way during her article do you feel as though you have to guess what Ivins beliefs are geared towards. Ivins introductions alone shows her feelins as she states that guns are bad and knvies are better.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Every two years more Americans are killed by guns than during the entire fourteen years of the Vietnam War” according to Gregory Orfalea in “Self-Inflicted Carnage” (1). Gregory Orfalea, a credible American author, argues in his article “Self-Inflicted Carnage” that there is a desperate need for modern gun control measures in the United States due to the recent increase of gun violence. Robert A. Levy, chairman of the Cato Institute and co-counsel in District of Columbia v. Heller, on the other hand, states in “Our Core Second Amendment Rights” that gun control measures not only violate the rights protected by the Second Amendment, but would also be ineffective because the government cannot control people nor the firearms that have already been legally distributed to rightful owning citizens. In their articles, both Orfalea and Levy argue their drastically opposing positions on modern-day gun reform because where Orfalea demands immediate control based on recent tragedy, Levy argues that gun regulations will not solve anything because they do not fight the source of the problem--the people. These authors both represent their stances through their opinions on topics such as…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ´´ A gun is a tool, it's a weapon but also a right to own or hold or shoot a firearm. ´´Because it say’s in the Constitution of the United States of America right after the 1st Amendment, the 2nd Amendment says “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Without the 2nd Amendment, press like the New York times, New York Post, Daily News, and The Wall Street Journal, all…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Steve Nolan’s article “25 Reasons Why We Need To Preserve Our 2nd Amendment Right To Keep And Bear Arms,” he explains why we should bear arms, and why we should fight to keep our civil liberty to bear arms. This essay is intended to help the reader become more informed on the right to bear arms, how the media only covers gun related incidents, but not instances where guns have saved people, and how many politicians contort the 2nd amendment to aid them in elections. By uncovering some truths about gun owners, Nolan and many other pro-gun activist can shed some light on the truth behind the 2nd amendment. Nolan can affectively argue ones right to the 2nd amendment through studies, statistics, and personal experiences to produce evidence that supports the right to bear arms. The second amendement of the constitution expresses the right for American citizens to bear, or posess guns.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control in America is a significant issue, with an average of 91 gun related deaths per day, it is a matter that can no longer be ignored. Being controversial in its nature, author Phoebe Maltz Bovy doesn 't hesitate to shed light on her opinion on the affair. In her article “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.” Bovy is quick to state that all guns are bad regardless of their purpose or the respective owner, that they’re all nothing more than dangerous machines.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment, is a very controversial area under discussion in the media. Both advocates for and against gun ownership have been lobbying Congress to gain legislation in their favor for decades. Congress is at a standstill over gun issues and has voted down all proposals on gun control in the legislature. Although regulation is useless against criminals some harm can be avoided through tougher unified gun control, the American people have a Second Amendment right to bear arms, nevertheless regulators must decide who should be allowed ownership of what guns and if any training should be required among other issues, regulation must be clearly defined in order to protect society from needless harm. Proponents of gun control have debated that the Second Amendment only applies to members of militias and does not apply to individual…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thesis:The second amendment should not be taken away from the american citizens. The argument that guns kill people is stupid because someone has to exert a force on the weapon for it to even fire. he problem is not guns it’s the crazy people that do crazy things whether they have a gun or a knife or any object that can be used as a weapon so if you are gonna ban guns then you might as well ban kitchen knives and pencils. the people that want to ban guns never look at how many innocent lives are saved by guns in the hands of responsible civilians.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That is one of the most important questions in today's society. Just as there are the two political parties, there are two “parties” to gun control. The citizens in favor of gun ownership, and the freedom to obtain and use guns, are relying on the Constitution. However, the opposing side is relying on the statistics that come from the increasing number of shootings across the nation. Those in favor of gun ownership beleive that it is a fundamental right to own a gun, and it should not be taken away.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the course of recent years, Americans' support for rigid gun control laws has been declining even as the number of mass shootings is on the ascent. Gun control is a standout amongst the most forcefully divisive issues in the U.S. today. Envision appreciating a film at the theater or eating a dinner at Taco Bell while individuals surrounding you are conveying stacked arms. In spite of the fact that this may appear to be inconceivable, it is conceivable in light of the fact that the second amendment of the United States Constitution gives residents the privilege to have and convey weapons.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "When the law disarms good guys, bad guys rejoice." ~Ted Nugent. What do you thing about gun control? Guns should not be ban or taken away they should have certain requirements. Guns are our personal rights and they are our Second Amendment.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rodger D. McGrath is a well-known supporter of the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, the right to keep and bear arms. He wrote the article “A God-Given Natural Right.” McGrath’s article covers former disarmament, rise in crime, and history of the Second Amendment. His article has convincing reasoning for his intended audience. His targeted patrons are those who fiercely support the right to bear arms, proudly own multiple guns, believe gun restrictions mean complete disarmament, and those whom fear total government takeover.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to a study published in 2012, the number of gun-related murders committed is at its lowest rate since 1981, even with an increased amount of people owning firearms (Gun Rhetoric, 2012). On the opposite side of the spectrum, those that support stricter gun control policies argue that the Second Amendment does not provide an unlimited right to own guns (US Supreme Court). Proponents of more gun control laws state that the Second Amendment is as dated as The Constitution and that it was intended only for militia . Nowhere in the Second Amendment is it explicitly stated that it was created to protect an individual’s right to bear arms (Waldman,…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays